Electrical instruments

No description
37 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Gyro Gearloose
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
let the resistance of circled part be R
No description
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
effective circut is this
No description
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
clearly voltmeter is in parallel to R and the system above upon increasing resistance of rheostat voltage drop across the system remains same and ammeter reading decreased where am i going wrong
Sephrina
Sephrina3w ago
is the answer a?
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
nope
nori
nori3w ago
it's c? i dont think you can write it this way though
nori
nori3w ago
No description
nori
nori3w ago
@hardcoreisdead if c is the ans, then here's the soln i think taking a single resistor R and putting a voltmeter across it is wrong cuz the first two portions are in parallel you cant directly take it in series with the other resistor
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
Haan yaar baat toh shi hai
flower
flower3w ago
You can't do this Voltage on the upper horizontal line drops after every resistor By taking It while as R You are not taking theta drop into consideration
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
No description
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
how can we be sure i1>i2
nori
nori3w ago
like we can do it by applying kvl and seeing the drop on the first resistor but yeah i1>i2 because the total current as well the ratio decreases cuz i through ammeter will be total current times the other resistance/ total
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
No description
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
This is suffice ig @nori
nori
nori3w ago
hey could u clear up one thing why would total resistance reduce the rheostat wala resistance increased right.. toh parallel wale ka value will also increase totality me @hardcoreisdead
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
rheostat resistance inc its in parallel so kam hogi right? 1/2 1/3 = 5/6 ==> resistance = 6/5 1/2 1/2 = 1 ==> resistance = 1
nori
nori3w ago
yeah toh badh raha hai na, when denominator increases or am i just idk that's also what i did here
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
let initially be 1/3 and 1/2 so uski resistance 6/5 hui let it increase to 1/2 and 1/2 so uski 1 hui
nori
nori3w ago
is this wrong
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
either u r tripping or i am tripping
nori
nori3w ago
yeah idk some 3rd person needed
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
@integralofe^2v help brother is this correct
nori
nori3w ago
1/R1 + 1/Rv (rv is the rheostat wala variable).. so when Rv increases , 1/Rv decreases. so 1/Req decreases so Req increases
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
No description
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
ohhhhhhh ohhhh
nori
nori3w ago
u r addin them up
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
pura proof kharab ho gya infact nhi hua rheostat ki resistance badha ke overall resistance badh gyi so kam current jayega pure system mein so fs ammeter mein kam jayega baaki stuff still holds @nori right?
nori
nori3w ago
yeahh it's a lot easier this way
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
what way
nori
nori3w ago
nhi when it increases yeah like compared to the case u did before if like it were to decrease
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
yeahh sorted right?? close kardu?
nori
nori3w ago
yeah
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP3w ago
+solved @nori
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@741159941934415883> (741159941934415883)
Time
<t:1754658954:R>
Solved by
<@1239101937866248205> (1239101937866248205)

Did you find this page helpful?