rotation

i hve one conceptual doubt case-1 we hve a rod in a horinzontal plane and a bullet comes and strike it as some point...in these cases we apply momentum conservation the linear one,about the point of collision case2- we hve a rod which is not hinged and it is rotating with w about com and again one bullet strikes it at some point..Now here when we conserve linear momentum we conserve it about the com unlike in fixed axis rotation..why is this so?
10 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Gyro Gearloose
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Shreyaaa~
Shreyaaa~OP4d ago
one reason im able to think of is that in fixed axis rotation..there could be some force of the hinge due to the impulse from bullet so we cannot conserve momentum of whole sys
SirLancelotDuLac
In case 1, is the rod hinged?
Shreyaaa~
Shreyaaa~OP4d ago
sorry i forgot to mention yes it is
SirLancelotDuLac
Haan, then the hinge exerts some force on the rod Think of it this way: If the hinge was not there the rod would have some linear momentum right? But the hinge stop it from moving and "converts" some of this to rotational momentum
Shreyaaa~
Shreyaaa~OP4d ago
if the rod was initially at rest then some part of kinetic energy of bullet got converted into rotational kE? and ofc some energy would be lost in collision
Real potato
Real potato4d ago
Yes correct
Shreyaaa~
Shreyaaa~OP2d ago
Oky +solved @Real potato
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1403315966720479295> (1403315966720479295)
Time
<t:1755855964:R>
Solved by
<@1088352651567173632> (1088352651567173632)

Did you find this page helpful?