Non-gm users updating combat documents?

Hio. Working on an implementation of the Doomsong system, in which actors pre-plan their actions at the top of a combat round. My question is as follows: What is the intended method of allowing users to have ownership of combatants for tokens they have ownership of? I am attempting to store planned actions on the combatant itself (it seemed convenient) within the

.system

.system

, and though this works great for the GM, I discovered to my dismay during my first playtest that players do not own their own combatants. Updating

initiative

initiative

works but my system does not use initiative.

permission

permission

is returning

, this appears to be rejected in the backend.

Is there a workaround for this? Or a solution, rather. I'm well aware that the easiest workaround would just be to jam this data back into the actor's

system

system

data but isolating just felt so elegant at the time.

LoEFD

League of Extraordinary FoundryVTT Developers•7mo ago•

25 replies

WHITESPINE

Non-gm users updating combat documents?

.system

.system

, and though this works great for the GM, I discovered to my dismay during my first playtest that players do not own their own combatants. Updating

initiative

initiative

works but my system does not use initiative.

permission

permission

is returning

, this appears to be rejected in the backend.

Is there a workaround for this? Or a solution, rather. I'm well aware that the easiest workaround would just be to jam this data back into the actor's

system

system

data but isolating just felt so elegant at the time.

Non-gm users updating combat documents?

Similar Threads

Non-gm users updating combat documents?

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads