20 Replies
@Gyro Gearloose
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.Since ac=0 , a=0 as well??
its correct
and the acc of a and b would simply be mgsinq/mass of (a+b)
but that would imply whatever be the mass ratio acc of wedge would be zero
the vid i picked this up from said otherwise
Vinay Uppal
YouTube
ONE SHOT: Crash Course Lec 3. Laws of Motion. Friction. Real JEE Ad...
Watch FREE Gamechanger course Lecture here about the GREATEST SHORTCUT in ROTATION : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqGrCFKcTM8
Register for free Crash Course and FREE Gamechanger lectures at vinayuppal.com along with FREE DPP and Pathfinder Book Homework with full video solutions!
Register now for free at vinayuppal.com.
00:00 Intro to New...
oneshot - jee advanced...
Something is wrong with ur eqns what he said is correct
lol just need to revise
The acc of a and c is not just a
thats why i posted lol
Usme wo wedge ka bhi add subtract kro
wrt wedge they are
wedge ka accn i considered ac
a_c
I think using virtual work method in wedge frame
Is making some plm
tension ka work zero hoga 🤔?
it should be
Why?”
i encountered this in my "constraint relations" doubt too
pure system pe net external force zero hai so net work done bhi zero hua na
I think so
But fir isme gadbad kaha h
Like acc of wedge
Shouldn’t be independent of mass
Idts virtual work method gives u the ans here as it leads to 0=0 condition so u shid use other method as he used in the vid
Btw conaider work of normal here too as theres a comp of accel along normal too