1.6.0 testing

Community Testing Requests:

For those of you interested in helping to QA this branch, I'll put together a list of stuff I think we're most concerned about in a thread.

New Stuff to Test:
Advancements
- Double check that editing advancements works on Class and Subclass Items
- Verify that advancement forwards and backwards works as expected on Character Actors


---
Older Stuff I consider a Critical Flow for smoke testing:
Item Usage
- Rolling an Item
- Rolling Attacks
- Rolling Damage

In particular verify that any scale values referenced in such fields work as expected.

Actor Creation and Editing
- NPC, Character, and Vehicle
- Sheets should all still open and modify fields as expected

Item Creation and Editing
- Verify that Class Items and Subclass Items can be created (as well as the other kinds of items from before)
- Double check that existing items are still editable

Token
- Verify that token attributes can be edited correctly, damage applied, effects, etc.

How are you deleting/leveling down? Via the core sheet or via macro?

try something for me:
1. Close and re-open the sheet after adding an advancement
2. (if that doesn't make the confirm thing work), refresh after adding the advancement

curious. ticket time

thanks @MaxPat 😉
lmk when ticket made and I'll put milestones and stuff on it

@Calego (ElfFriend) gave LeaguePoints™ to @MaxPat (#221 • 2)

That is why the scale value doesn’t include a dice count by default

I agree that we should include a unarmed strike attack

Huh, they should be able to

🎟️

The benefits of 🎵 tEsTiNg 🎵

❤️ you guys for pulling this down and giving it a run through

The active effect for bonus rage damage and monk's unarmored movement cannot reference the scale values because active effects in core don't allow @ formulas in the value fields of scale value

Not sure how useful scale value for a fighter's extra attack is given that that particular number wouldn't actually be used anywhere

Are you using DAE?

Hmm, oh, I know why

It's cause it is just adding the @ formula directly into the roll formula, and then resolving it there

So many plusses

Gotta make sure you add + before the active effect in rage 🙂

Just glad someone is testing it, been working on this release since October, nice to have fresh eyes 😵‍💫

@MaxPat gave LeaguePoints™ to @arbron (#61 • 32)

can anyone confirm this?
https://gitlab.com/foundrynet/dnd5e/-/issues/1490

smells like a race condition

Also, have you always been able to add items to actors in locked compendia via drag and drop?

testing in a non dev env

yep, that works. kk not a regression

well you can't edit anything else on an actor in a locked compendium, so I didn't expect to be able to drop new items on them

Ooook, now I can't reproduce the level up dropdown bug.

Is this something developermode is causing???

Should open a ticket for this

Not really, I think maybe there's a vague hope for a more dedicated "spell list" mechanism. Haven't heard anything specific but that's my vague hope at least :)

I don't think we should add spell lists until we have proper support for it, like the ability to ensure the spellcasting ability is appropriate for multi-classing, preparation mode is properly set, players have the ability to easily skip adding spells without having to unclick each one individually, and modules have a way to add spells to the spell list in a proper standardized way