Robert Graff Comments - Answer Overflow

Robert Graff

Posts Comments

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by aidalgol on 5/4/2025 in #support

Rendering AshPaperTrails

@allenwyma I don't know of any good public examples, but if you find one let me know.

11 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 7/20/2023 in #support

How do relationships with composite keys work?

That's correct

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/18/2023 in #support

Duplicate input types for GraphQL

I am working on ash_graphql main. I can not figure out how to reproduce this in the test lib, but I have it working in app now using graphql_type() 🤷‍♂️

11 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/18/2023 in #support

Duplicate input types for GraphQL

I did not define a graphql_type and so it was assuming one for me. Setting my own graphql_type fixes it.

def graphql_type(_), do: :option

def graphql_type(_), do: :option

So to recap: when I use a nested union as a singular argument and array attribute in two mutations while not defining a graphql_type, absinthe throws an after compile error:

## Locations
/workspace/app/deps/ash_graphql/lib/resource/resource.ex:1385
/workspace/app/deps/ash_graphql/lib/resource/resource.ex:1385

Absinthe type identifier :feature_variant is not unique.

References to types must be unique.

> All types within a GraphQL schema must have unique names. No two provided
> types may have the same name. No provided type may have a name which
> conflicts with any built in types (including Scalar and Introspection
> types).

Reference: https://github.com/facebook/graphql/blob/master/spec/Section%203%20--%20Type%20System.md#type-system


    (absinthe 1.7.5) lib/absinthe/schema.ex:392: Absinthe.Schema.__after_compile__/2
    (stdlib 4.3) lists.erl:1350: :lists.foldl/3

## Locations
/workspace/app/deps/ash_graphql/lib/resource/resource.ex:1385
/workspace/app/deps/ash_graphql/lib/resource/resource.ex:1385

Absinthe type identifier :feature_variant is not unique.

References to types must be unique.

> All types within a GraphQL schema must have unique names. No two provided
> types may have the same name. No provided type may have a name which
> conflicts with any built in types (including Scalar and Introspection
> types).

Reference: https://github.com/facebook/graphql/blob/master/spec/Section%203%20--%20Type%20System.md#type-system


    (absinthe 1.7.5) lib/absinthe/schema.ex:392: Absinthe.Schema.__after_compile__/2
    (stdlib 4.3) lists.erl:1350: :lists.foldl/3

In my repo, I can replicate it reliably. And I'm unable to replicate it in the ash_graphql test suite.

11 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/18/2023 in #support

Duplicate input types for GraphQL

Spent some time unsuccessfully trying to write a test for ash_graphql, and while doing so figured out a work around.

11 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/18/2023 in #support

Duplicate input types for GraphQL

will do.

11 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/11/2023 in #support

Applying constraints to embedded union types

The union raises the struct error, but adding the form for one of the variants leads to other errors

22 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/11/2023 in #support

Applying constraints to embedded union types

I'm trying to get it working with just one type to start.

    create_feature_form =
      AshPhoenix.Form.for_create(Package, :create,
        api: MyApi,
        forms: [
          variants: [
            type: :list,
            resource: PackageOption.Boolean, # or is it PackageOption Union?
            create_action: :create
          ]
        ]
      )
      |> to_form()

    create_feature_form =
      AshPhoenix.Form.for_create(Package, :create,
        api: MyApi,
        forms: [
          variants: [
            type: :list,
            resource: PackageOption.Boolean, # or is it PackageOption Union?
            create_action: :create
          ]
        ]
      )
      |> to_form()

[error] GenServer #PID<0.1349.0> terminating
** (UndefinedFunctionError) function Kickplan.Environments.FeatureVariant.__struct__/0 is undefined or private
    (kickplan 0.1.0) Kickplan.Environments.FeatureVariant.__struct__()

[error] GenServer #PID<0.1349.0> terminating
** (UndefinedFunctionError) function Kickplan.Environments.FeatureVariant.__struct__/0 is undefined or private
    (kickplan 0.1.0) Kickplan.Environments.FeatureVariant.__struct__()

22 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/11/2023 in #support

Applying constraints to embedded union types

I can switch the behaviour for the union type pretty easily, but I'm not sure I'm adding forms correctly.

22 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/11/2023 in #support

Applying constraints to embedded union types

Got it. That makes sense now. For other reasons, I've not been able to get forms working and I haven't tested the apis

22 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/11/2023 in #support

Applying constraints to embedded union types

Are the validations supposed to be skipped if there's no casting?

22 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/11/2023 in #support

Applying constraints to embedded union types

Wow, ok. Using a map instead of a struct, the constraints and the validations are applied.

22 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/11/2023 in #support

Applying constraints to embedded union types

      Package.update(
        package,
        %{
          options: [
            %Ash.Union{
              type: :boolean,
              value: %PackageOption.Boolean{
                type: :boolean,
                value: false,
                key: "not a valid key",
                enabled: true
              }
            }
          ]
        }
      )

      {:ok, %MyApi.Package{
        ...
        options: [
          %Ash.Union{
            value: #PackageOption.Boolean<__lateral_join_source__: nil, __meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:built, "">, id: "e8668815-061c-4f86-bfa7-4d166fd1dba2", key: "true!", value: true, type: :boolean, enabled: true, aggregates: %{}, calculations: %{}, __order__: nil, ...>, 
            type: :boolean
            }
        ]
      }}

      Package.update(
        package,
        %{
          options: [
            %Ash.Union{
              type: :boolean,
              value: %PackageOption.Boolean{
                type: :boolean,
                value: false,
                key: "not a valid key",
                enabled: true
              }
            }
          ]
        }
      )

      {:ok, %MyApi.Package{
        ...
        options: [
          %Ash.Union{
            value: #PackageOption.Boolean<__lateral_join_source__: nil, __meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:built, "">, id: "e8668815-061c-4f86-bfa7-4d166fd1dba2", key: "true!", value: true, type: :boolean, enabled: true, aggregates: %{}, calculations: %{}, __order__: nil, ...>, 
            type: :boolean
            }
        ]
      }}

22 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gordoneliel on 8/4/2023 in #support

Testing: How to approach testing

and

      assert {:error, %Ash.Error.Forbidden{}} =
               User.update_password(
                 user,
                 %{
                   password: new_password,
                   password_confirmation: new_password,
                   current_password: current_password
                 },
                 actor: unauthorized_user
               )

      assert {:error, %Ash.Error.Forbidden{}} =
               User.update_password(
                 user,
                 %{
                   password: new_password,
                   password_confirmation: new_password,
                   current_password: current_password
                 },
                 actor: unauthorized_user
               )

Seeing better patterns would be useful

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gordoneliel on 8/4/2023 in #support

Testing: How to approach testing

This interests me. Right now we're doing:

      assert {:error, %Ash.Error.Invalid{}} =
               User.update_password(user, %{
                 password: new_password,
                 password_confirmation: new_password <> "oops",
                 current_password: wrong_password
               })

      assert {:error, %Ash.Error.Invalid{}} =
               User.update_password(user, %{
                 password: new_password,
                 password_confirmation: new_password <> "oops",
                 current_password: wrong_password
               })

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/3/2023 in #support

Why don't read actions filter by attributes?

I see. It's more about being more robust than a simple key/value filter. Thanks for helping me understand

13 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 8/3/2023 in #support

Why don't read actions filter by attributes?

This is a question more about the philosophy and intent, and less asking "how to?". Yes, we're currently using Ash.Query to filter. My question was "why?" because it seems like such a common use case. I think of using query as an escape hatch of sorts, because I really want my actions to define the intended usecases.
It's similar to how the GraphQL interface creates the input automatically from what's filterable. You don't have to define a read action with arguments for the filterable attributes.

13 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 7/28/2023 in #support

Key :editing_tenant not found

Would be nice to be able to configure tenant selection as a select input by setting providing tenant options in an assigns.

9 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 7/28/2023 in #support

Key :editing_tenant not found

Still can't select a tenant:

[error] GenServer #PID<0.4922.0> terminating
** (FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in AshAdmin.PageLive.handle_event/3
    (ash_admin 0.9.0) lib/ash_admin/pages/page_live.ex:284: AshAdmin.PageLive.handle_event("stop_editing_tenant", %{"value" => ""}, #Phoenix.LiveView.Socket<id: "phx-F3YupvdZ02N11DZB", endpoint: KickplanWeb.Endpoint, view: AshAdmin.PageLive, parent_pid: nil, root_pid: #PID<0.4922.0>, router: KickplanWeb.Router, assigns: %{__changed__: %{}, action: %Ash.Resource.Actions.Read{arguments: [], description: nil, filter: nil, get_by: nil, get?: false, manual: nil, metadata: [], modify_query: nil, name: :read, pagination: false, preparations: [], primary?: true, touches_resources: [], transaction?: false, type: :read}, action_type: :read, actor: nil, actor_api: nil, actor_paused: true, actor_resources: [], api: Kickplan.Environments, apis: [Kickplan.Organizations, Kickplan.Users, Kickplan.Environments], authorizing: false, flash: %{}, id: nil, live_action: :page, params: %{"action" => "read", "action_type" => "read", "api" => "Environments", "resource" => "Account", "route" => [], "table" => ""}, polymorphic_actions: nil, prefix: "/admin", primary_key: nil, record: nil, resource: Kickplan.Environments.Account, tab: nil, table: nil, tables: [], tenant: nil, url_path: "/admin"}, transport_pid: #PID<0.4910.0>, ...>)
    (phoenix_live_view 0.19.5) lib/phoenix_live_view/channel.ex:401: anonymous fn/3 in Phoenix.LiveView.Channel.view_handle_event/3
    (telemetry 1.2.1) /workspace/app/deps/telemetry/src/telemetry.erl:321: :telemetry.span/3
    (phoenix_live_view 0.19.5) lib/phoenix_live_view/channel.ex:221: Phoenix.LiveView.Channel.handle_info/2
    (stdlib 4.3) gen_server.erl:1123: :gen_server.try_dispatch/4
    (stdlib 4.3) gen_server.erl:1200: :gen_server.handle_msg/6
    (stdlib 4.3) proc_lib.erl:240: :proc_lib.init_p_do_apply/3
Last message: %Phoenix.Socket.Message{topic: "lv:phx-F3YupvdZ02N11DZB", event: "event", payload: %{"event" => "stop_editing_tenant", "type" => "click", "value" => %{"value" => ""}}, ref: "7", join_ref: "4"}

[error] GenServer #PID<0.4922.0> terminating
** (FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in AshAdmin.PageLive.handle_event/3
    (ash_admin 0.9.0) lib/ash_admin/pages/page_live.ex:284: AshAdmin.PageLive.handle_event("stop_editing_tenant", %{"value" => ""}, #Phoenix.LiveView.Socket<id: "phx-F3YupvdZ02N11DZB", endpoint: KickplanWeb.Endpoint, view: AshAdmin.PageLive, parent_pid: nil, root_pid: #PID<0.4922.0>, router: KickplanWeb.Router, assigns: %{__changed__: %{}, action: %Ash.Resource.Actions.Read{arguments: [], description: nil, filter: nil, get_by: nil, get?: false, manual: nil, metadata: [], modify_query: nil, name: :read, pagination: false, preparations: [], primary?: true, touches_resources: [], transaction?: false, type: :read}, action_type: :read, actor: nil, actor_api: nil, actor_paused: true, actor_resources: [], api: Kickplan.Environments, apis: [Kickplan.Organizations, Kickplan.Users, Kickplan.Environments], authorizing: false, flash: %{}, id: nil, live_action: :page, params: %{"action" => "read", "action_type" => "read", "api" => "Environments", "resource" => "Account", "route" => [], "table" => ""}, polymorphic_actions: nil, prefix: "/admin", primary_key: nil, record: nil, resource: Kickplan.Environments.Account, tab: nil, table: nil, tables: [], tenant: nil, url_path: "/admin"}, transport_pid: #PID<0.4910.0>, ...>)
    (phoenix_live_view 0.19.5) lib/phoenix_live_view/channel.ex:401: anonymous fn/3 in Phoenix.LiveView.Channel.view_handle_event/3
    (telemetry 1.2.1) /workspace/app/deps/telemetry/src/telemetry.erl:321: :telemetry.span/3
    (phoenix_live_view 0.19.5) lib/phoenix_live_view/channel.ex:221: Phoenix.LiveView.Channel.handle_info/2
    (stdlib 4.3) gen_server.erl:1123: :gen_server.try_dispatch/4
    (stdlib 4.3) gen_server.erl:1200: :gen_server.handle_msg/6
    (stdlib 4.3) proc_lib.erl:240: :proc_lib.init_p_do_apply/3
Last message: %Phoenix.Socket.Message{topic: "lv:phx-F3YupvdZ02N11DZB", event: "event", payload: %{"event" => "stop_editing_tenant", "type" => "click", "value" => %{"value" => ""}}, ref: "7", join_ref: "4"}

9 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by Robert Graff on 7/28/2023 in #support

Key :editing_tenant not found

Fixed most my issues with content-security-policy changes.

9 replies

Gaming

Programming