gvanders Comments - Answer Overflow

gvanders

•Created by gvanders on 5/10/2023 in #support

Polymorphic Embedded Resources?

Grabbing the value of the union type returns an Ash.Resource struct. Are you thinking to then feed that in to an additional AshPhoenix.Form.for_update? My first thought was to implement it similar to multi-step forms where changing the tag value changed the nested form , but I haven't made one of those yet so thats all in theory

14 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 5/10/2023 in #support

Polymorphic Embedded Resources?

🫡

14 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by roberts.gulans on 5/4/2023 in #support

How to create organization after user creation.

This is way late but just in case, this may help https://discord.com/channels/711271361523351632/1097619151029289131/1097939364065062983

16 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

I'll take a look! Thanks for all the help 🙂

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

ahhh sorry that question was to a comment earlier in the thread

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

Is this something I'd implement on my side? Or that we'd add to AshPhoenix?

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

Then I'd have to know ahead of time which are nil. Which I guess is easy. If I have the data option set, I assume it shouldn't matter if the form is clobbered?

      |> AshPhoenix.Form.add_form(:background, type: :update, data: styles.background)

      |> AshPhoenix.Form.add_form(:background, type: :update, data: styles.background)

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

Mmm yeah probably simplest if I just keep the add_form

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

I'm parsing a tailwind string into resources, and then converting it back to string after form is submitted. So I just need to make sure theres an empty resource

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

Since that looks right, just checked something. In the actual data, I had one of the embedded resources set to nil (the second one). When it's not nil it appears. Sorry for that. I don't know if Ash should handle that case, but I'll make sure theres default empty structs

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/28/2023 in #support

Nested embedded Resource Form

Took out the Keyword.get(:forms before the map

28 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/19/2023 in #support

Reading Tenant ETS resources returns empty array

No problem! https://github.com/ash-project/ash/issues/567

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/19/2023 in #support

Reading Tenant ETS resources returns empty array

For ETS, it seems like the implementation details don't really matter like they do for postgres, so maybe it's enough to make sure the tenant field in the map isn't nil? Theres some add_tenant functions which only trigger for :context

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/19/2023 in #support

Reading Tenant ETS resources returns empty array

Yep attribute multi-tenancy

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/19/2023 in #support

Reading Tenant ETS resources returns empty array

As far as I can tell the tenant is nil on the read path, so it doesn't look in the right table. This is for attribute multitenancy, not sure about context.

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/19/2023 in #support

Reading Tenant ETS resources returns empty array

I can see the tenant table created and can get the data out with tab2list, so issue looks to be on the read path

10 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/18/2023 in #support

Patterns for Propagating Tenants to LiveComponents/LiveViews?

ahhh gotcha. Thanks 🙂

14 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/18/2023 in #support

Patterns for Propagating Tenants to LiveComponents/LiveViews?

Is the tenant always accessible via :_tenant in the DSLs??

14 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/18/2023 in #support

Patterns for Propagating Tenants to LiveComponents/LiveViews?

Not sure if I should make a new thread for this but I'm confused as to how to implement PubSub to work with tenants? If I have a pubsub notifier which says when something is added, and is added to the a list, I will get updates across tenant. Seems like I'll need to prefix a tenant_id somehow?

14 replies

AEAsh Elixir

•Created by gvanders on 4/17/2023 in #support

AshAuthenticationPhoenix Override Register Form

For completeness, the way I achieved this was by making a custom SignInLive, which was basically a copy of SignIn component in AshAuthentication.Phoenix, just with <:registry_extra> used in the strategy slot. I did not end up sticking with this, and instead created a default tenant on sign-in via

    create :register_with_tenant do
      accept([:email])
      argument(:password, :string, allow_nil?: false, sensitive?: true)
      argument(:password_confirmation, :string, allow_nil?: true, sensitive?: true)
      change({AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.HashPasswordChange, strategy_name: :password})
      change({AshAuthentication.GenerateTokenChange, strategy_name: :password})

      validate(AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.PasswordConfirmationValidation)

      change(fn changeset, _ ->
        Ash.Changeset.manage_relationship(changeset, :organization, %{}, type: :create)
      end)
    end

    create :register_with_tenant do
      accept([:email])
      argument(:password, :string, allow_nil?: false, sensitive?: true)
      argument(:password_confirmation, :string, allow_nil?: true, sensitive?: true)
      change({AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.HashPasswordChange, strategy_name: :password})
      change({AshAuthentication.GenerateTokenChange, strategy_name: :password})

      validate(AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.PasswordConfirmationValidation)

      change(fn changeset, _ ->
        Ash.Changeset.manage_relationship(changeset, :organization, %{}, type: :create)
      end)
    end

signed in with this action

    read :sign_in_with_tenant do
     # argument(:email, Ash.Type.CiString, allow_nil?: false)
      get? true
   #   argument(:password, :string, allow_nil?: false, sensitive?: true)

   #   prepare(AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.SignInPreparation)
      prepare(build(load: [:organization]))
    end

    read :sign_in_with_tenant do
     # argument(:email, Ash.Type.CiString, allow_nil?: false)
      get? true
   #   argument(:password, :string, allow_nil?: false, sensitive?: true)

   #   prepare(AshAuthentication.Strategy.Password.SignInPreparation)
      prepare(build(load: [:organization]))
    end

With these options

    get_by_subject_action_name :sign_in_with_tenant
    strategies do
      password :password do
        identity_field(:email)
        register_action_name(:register_with_tenant)
      end

    get_by_subject_action_name :sign_in_with_tenant
    strategies do
      password :password do
        identity_field(:email)
        register_action_name(:register_with_tenant)
      end

Really loved how the custom actions were validated! Was not expecting that and was able to just follow the error messages for what I was missing @jart

6 replies

Gaming

Programming