How can I use the name of an adjustable container (as string) to gain the adjustable container's obj
How can I use the name of an adjustable container (as string) to gain the adjustable container's object?
LI want to put a title when it's minimized, and no title when maximized, and found the resize event would give me the container name to work with
AIs that short for Discworld? Using
discworld.starturtle.net port 4242
Dwhat's the IP it gets?
Dhmm, try putting in
82.68.167.69 instead of the hostnameDinteresting it would let you ping but wasn't establishing the telnet connection on ipv6
ASounds like it should work, or at least it is thought that it should.
Discworld also supports IPv6 - the address for this is the same but only port 4242 is supported. http://discworld.starturtle.net/lpc/playing/getting_started.htmlDI'm pretty sure Mudlet works on ipv6 in general
Dhappy to help
CThat actually further confuses the picture.
You might (or might not) have broken or misconfigured IPv6 connectivity. See https://test-ipv6.com/ for starters.
You might (or might not) have broken or misconfigured IPv6 connectivity. See https://test-ipv6.com/ for starters.
This will test your browser and connection for IPv6 readiness, as well as show you your current IPv4 and IPv6 address.
ENot able to test this but it should be Adjustable.Container.all["your containername"]
LThanks I will try momentarily
LJust one other doubt, do I get no events when an adjustable container is closed? Because I want to make sure it can be resurrected after
EYou mean when you click the x? Clicking on the x just hides the container. it is doing the same as using mycontainer:hide(). There is no event for it
EMeaning you can resurrect it by mycontainer:show()
LYes the x
LHmm okay then I need to design around that
CIs there a doc how I could add GA to my MUD server? The Telnet RFC keeps speaking about half-duplex comms and obsolete terminals and whatnot, it's not immediately obvious how that can be used to measure latency.
DMudlet uses the telnet GA/EOR signal to determine that the game is done sending lines for processing and has generated a prompt. So technically, it's the time between the last command you sent and the game sending you the next prompt, not pure latency like you'd get with ping
CHmmm, interesting. So it'll depend on whether I'm battling or just spamming 'score' and 'inventory'
DIt's also handy for detecting prompts in triggers without having to write a regex to match every prompt it might be customized to
DGenerically speaking the N is 'network lag' and the S is 'system lag'
DBut the network lag is effected by the server processing time and such, I think.
CDoes it mean I should just stick a byte 249 in the end of every prompt, and that's it? Or should I negotiate this?
DI don't think it's negotiated per se, I think you can just stick the byte at the end of every prompt, but I'm not 100% sure on that. I don't do much work on the server end of things.
COK, thanks.
DOne of the other game admins here might speak up and tell you better than I can. heh
SIf it is NOT a "secure" connection, It connects to the FIRST IP address that gets found
whether that is IPv4 or IPv6 is down to the OS/DE/phases of the moon/what colour underwear (if any) you are wearing.
In a perfect world we'd be trying all addresses found and use the "best" one (for whatever constitutes "best") not just the first - the so-called "Happy Eyeballs" approach.
Failing that, we'd offer a knob to give the end-user some choices: ("First found" {the current situation}|"IPv4 Only"|"IPv6 Only") - which is something I have mooted previously...
whether that is IPv4 or IPv6 is down to the OS/DE/phases of the moon/what colour underwear (if any) you are wearing.
In a perfect world we'd be trying all addresses found and use the "best" one (for whatever constitutes "best") not just the first - the so-called "Happy Eyeballs" approach.
Failing that, we'd offer a knob to give the end-user some choices: ("First found" {the current situation}|"IPv4 Only"|"IPv6 Only") - which is something I have mooted previously...
CThese days, with Google, Wikipedia and whatnot all available over IPv6, I'd expect it to mostly work, if present.
SYou really need your ISP to provide IPv6 though - some of them just don't get this new-fangled (20+ year old) version of the Internetworking Protocol. Like say Virgin Media in the UK - they may offer Gigabit connectivity - but only over IPv4, as this epic (over 10 years running) Community Forum thread shows:
https://community.virginmedia.com/t5/QuickStart-set-up-and/IPv6-support-on-Virgin-media/td-p/35748/page/138
https://community.virginmedia.com/t5/QuickStart-set-up-and/IPv6-support-on-Virgin-media/td-p/35748/page/138
Virgin Media Community
Does anyone know whether (and if so when) Virgin plan to implement IPv6 on its network?
S
CYeah, but if they don't offer IPv6, your OS or Mudlet won't even try to use it. Thus if it is attempted yet fails, then probably something's moldy there.
SFor a good few years I ran a SIXXS tunnel to get me some IPv6 connectivity - but they sunsetted that in 2017 (IIRC) on the basis that "Your ISP should be offering IPv6 connectvity by now" - as it happened the tunnel got blocked a couple of years prior to that because setting up a tunnelled connection using SIXXS's AYIAY (Anything-in-anything) protocol needed a valid EMail and VM's own built-in EMail filtering blocked the validation process... 
CGood times. Pings were lower over SixXS tunnel than native IPv4.
Dwithout seeing the line, I'm gonna guess something passed in a nil value where it's expecting a true/false one