yes I am saying if that peak never cross the 500 gb then it means I have to pay for 500GB-month or b
yes I am saying if that peak never cross the 500 gb then it means I have to pay for 500GB-month or below then this right?
JOk thanks for the help, I have one more issue that is not related to R2 but related to Cloudflare ips , cause recently in my many Indian users reported that in their country cloudflare protected sites are taking too much time to load and sometimes not working.
what you think about it?
what you think about it?
UI think India sometimes bans cloudflare ips not really anything anyone but the government can fix
Jyea it can be possible
Tis it normal for it to take 1.6 seconds to upload a 1.2mb file to r2 this is my code:?
i posted this before in coding-help but got no response so im asking here too
https://github.com/ascellahost/ascellav3/blob/master/src/api.ts#L126-L252
i posted this before in coding-help but got no response so im asking here too
https://github.com/ascellahost/ascellav3/blob/master/src/api.ts#L126-L252
KHave you benchmarked just the R2 code?
KIt looks like there's a DB and KV involved here which will definitely add overhead
Tyeah small files are still 700ms
Tthe 2 db queries are prob 200ms each not sure about the kv one tho
K700ms doesn't sound unrealistic depending where your R2 bucket is and where your Worker is being invoked - you can hit the
?locationI think it might now appear in the dashboard? Not too sure
Tits in europe but someone from the us had similar results
Thello all! i have a n object (html file) in my bucket, and when i visit the link it downloads the html file isntead of showing it, any way to get it to show the file instead of downloading it?
JYou'll need to set the
Content-Typetext/htmlDepending on how you uploaded this, it can be set in the metadata at
httpMetadata.contentTypeah thank you, i got it working, your a star
RHey all, we've been using R2 to store podcast assets for a few months using r2.dev and it's been working well except recently it stopped syncing. We contacted apple support and apparently they can't reach the XML feed stored on r2.dev. They get a "This site can't be reached" error. Has anyone run into that before?
Kr2.dev has heavy rate limits and poor caching, you need to set up a custom R2 domain name. r2.dev isn't for production
RGot it, thanks!
KThere is no way to have the server do it, but you can list all objects and then sort locally, which may or may not be feasible
KAlternatively, if you have references to your objects stored in a database or something, use the database to track that information
KYou could also technically sort by ""date"" if your objects have their date in their key prefix or something
KI would say the truly best idea is to track uploaded files in a database
KYou could attach literally any other data to them that way
KBut if the date is part of the key prefix, you can list objects after a certain date directly on the API, you would not need to keep syncing
KBecause you could use
start-afterJust use PutObject if your file is too small for multipart
KIf you must do parts then it also must be big enough for multipart
UIt is on here in a code comment: https://developers.cloudflare.com/r2/api/workers/workers-multipart-usage/
But I assume this 5MB minimum size is pretty universal across all S3 compatible providers given that is the limit S3 sets.
5MB is the minimum part size, except for the last part
But I assume this 5MB minimum size is pretty universal across all S3 compatible providers given that is the limit S3 sets.
AIs there any plans to decrease the scope of what R2 API tokens have access to? Currently:
- There are two access levels, read, or write, any consideration to make this more granular? What if my token only needs to Put items, but does not need to Delete anything? (protecting from mass deletion attacks)
- Allowing us to scope what buckets each token has access to, I host a few R2 buckets, and a lot of them have to write to their relevant R2 bucket, it would be neat if I could scope them to be able to only write to the buckets they actually need.
UBucket scoped is coming soon I believe there was a tweet saying Q3 this year. As far as the first point not sure if that is currently planned.
AGreat to hear about bucket scoping! Sounds good, is this the best place to leave product feedback for the first point?
UYes it is the team actively monitors this channel
SFor the first point, a presigned URL might work as well (although you’ll have to deal with expiry etc.)
AMy concern isn’t with reading, my concern is with what each token can do.
AIf my api process only needs to upload and never delete, I’d like that R2 token to be scoped down, to only do that (ie. Least privilege), it doesn’t need to read the bucket directly, thus I don’t think a pre signed URL would apply here
SBucket-scoped permissions are coming pretty soon, but IAM-compatible permissions aren't planned for now
Janyone know how to get your bucket to have public access, as even on the r2.dev domain it is not viewable publicly and I have no idea what I am doing wrong
HJ
HNo, I mean, if you replace account.r2.dev with your R2.Dev domain, and
hey.htmlso on my custom domain for it I get this which is the same thing that I get when I had it use the r2.dev url as well, do you want me to remove my custom domain while testing?
HWhat is the path you are using?