can't sleep for a negative amount of time
can't sleep for a negative amount of time
Cpretty sure it's either infinite or zero time
Lnot with that attitude
Acomputers can't
i however can
i however can
Cwindows waitable timers i think interpret negative values as relative, and positive as a specific date, and I'm pretty sure (at least i hope so) that breakneck timer uses the relative by default
Llook at ze code
C
Ci wish i could
Mfgvdfjghf
Lhave you heard of a Web Browser
Mther3e's a github app
Ayes
Lyes
Ait is terrible
Csounds like a lot of work
Mi wouldn't know i don't use phones
Cit's about average
Lthe share button literally lets you forward it to a web browser
Ci was too lazy
Lskill issue
Mforward it to your mother
Mshe loves coding
Cyikes
Lso real
Canyways
Acan't forward it if you don't have one smh
Mtrue
KHmm... would I get an accurate reading of how much time is spent on my messy code if I used a stopwatch to measure around
window.DoUpdate and window.DoRender()?KOr is that a terrible idea for accuracy?
Myeah it's alright
Mstopwatch is HPT it'll work
L(not on all platforms)
Kcan also use the static methods on stopwatch but an instance is fine too
Mit's HPT on windows and linux users can FIGURE IT OUT THEMSELVES
Mit's open source CODE SOME DAMN TIMERS
Lthey did
Mi don't know what happens if you disable HPET
Lon (modern) linux its high accuracy too
K
Mthat should be more
KNot as much as I thought honestly, with how many string.format and stuff I shoved in there
Lcomputers are a lot faster than you think
Myeah
Mstring format takes nanoseconds
KYeah my brain is definitely still stuck in the 90s
Ldont worry it also kinda took nanoseconds in the 90s, computers were also really fast back then
Mthe thing that kills games nowadays is file i/o and GPU bottlenecks
Kthats why ssds are such a big deal
Mi mean, let's see, on a 386, it's maybe a few memcpy operations
Kor were when they first arrived anyway
Kfile io is a big deal as it turns out
