Li sure hope not
Lthis has to be something small and silly
Lthe new one should be more correct since im following the original functions behaviour a lot closer (you give back a pointer to the memory inside of the passed in header, no memcpy/malloc takes place, before i gave back the pointer of a string literal)
MNo that's why it's called a view
Lexactly, so the memory should still be valid when i pass it back to the game, as im passing it back a pointer to its own memory
MIs it not length prefixed
MA string view
MNo wait I'm dumb ignite me
MIgnore
L
MFftffff
Lheres the code so anyone can take a closer look, yes that return value is correct (it needs to return the offset from
headerAddr to the newline after the returned value)code.cpp2.41KB
Li feel like im just missing something obvious
LWOW thats a fucking red herring and a half
Lso LBP has this thing called the digest key which it uses to verify the data is both not corrupted and not tampered with
LLBP PSP verifies this digest
Lif the digest is wrong, it refuses to connect
LHOWEVER, there seems to be a bug in the implementation
Lif the digest is invalid eg. its not in the right format, or missing altogether
Lthe check is bypassed entirely on the client
Lso
Lmy original hack code
Lwhich faked
X-exe-v and X-data-vLhad a bug
Lstrcasecmp returns 0 if equalNOT 0 if different, like i thought
Lso what was happening
Lwas when it checked the HTTP headers for the digest
Lit was getting returned
205Lfor the digest
Lwhich is clearly wrong
Land it failed to parse
Land the digest check was skipped
LHOWEVER
Lmy replacement proper code
Lwas ACTUALLY returning the digest when it asked for it
Land the digest check is seemingly failing for some reason
Lso the solution to the problem was for the server to not send the digest on PSP
Lmy client code was perfectly working
Lthe digest is mostly a server side check anyway so its fine
L(eg. to help prevent forged requests on the server)
Lbut the days of that being effective are long over
J@Perksey i sent an email to you, let me know if you've got it
unclear because the issue is sending mail to microsoft servers and your domain uses outlook protection
unclear because the issue is sending mail to microsoft servers and your domain uses outlook protection
Pjust forward me the undeliverable sender
Pit's the details included in that message i need
Pi.e. the bounce reason
Jyeah, i should've sent it
ill just send it from my gmail
ill just send it from my gmail
A
hmmmm should I write my own UI library or use GTK directlyadvantages of gtk:
* it already exists
* it already is proven to work
* it already does not involve needing to write my own stupid UI that will probably break
* it can handle resizing and different DPI automatically
* a rust library already exists for it
advantages of a custom library
* my program revolves around a custom and complex table structure which would not be easy to replicate in GTK
* GTK is sorta iffy on platforms that ain't linux, meanwhile SDL can run on basically anything
* i can add funny custom snowfall effects which you bet i am doing
* i can customize the look and feel of my program more which i also want to do
hmmmmmmm, choices choices
Tjust don't use QT kthx bye
Afortunately rust does not have any QT bindings
Awell it does