❔ Difference between public property with protected setters and getters and protected property?

T

Thinker•10/6/23, 8:51 PM

Iirc it's not possible for a property getter to have an accessibility equal to or less than the setter (besides public)

M

MODiX•10/6/23, 8:51 PM

REPL Result: Failure

class C
{
    public int X { protected get; protected set; }
}

class C
{
    public int X { protected get; protected set; }
}

class C
{
    public int X { protected get; protected set; }
}

class C
{
    public int X { protected get; protected set; }
}

Exception: CompilationErrorException

- Cannot specify accessibility modifiers for both accessors of the property or indexer 'C.X'

- Cannot specify accessibility modifiers for both accessors of the property or indexer 'C.X'

- Cannot specify accessibility modifiers for both accessors of the property or indexer 'C.X'

- Cannot specify accessibility modifiers for both accessors of the property or indexer 'C.X'

Compile: 441.349ms | Execution: 0.000ms | React with ❌ to remove this embed.

D

DecoherenceOP•10/6/23, 8:54 PM

it can be protected if the setter isnt

T

Thinker•10/6/23, 8:55 PM

In which case you'll have a property which anyone can set but only derived classes can read

D

DecoherenceOP•10/6/23, 9:17 PM

if the property itself is protected, does it extend to both get and set?

T

Thinker•10/6/23, 9:18 PM

Yeah, then both the getter and setter with be protected

A

Accord•10/7/23, 9:29 PM

Was this issue resolved? If so, run

/close

/close

otherwise I will mark this as stale and this post will be archived until there is new activity.