just realised this is not possible also (ref struct as generics, iirc this is why I included the very vague "unless the Silk.NET team deem it inappropriate or inapplicable" language)public static implicit operator PTRMUTPTR(Span<PTRMUT> span) => new(ref span.GetPinnableReference());
public static implicit operator PTRMUTPTR(Span<PTRMUT> span) => new(ref span.GetPinnableReference());
CC
P
K
MP
APCPstill implicitpublic static implicit operator void***(PTRMUTPTR<T> ptr) => (void***)Unsafe.AsPointer(ref Unsafe.AsRef(in ptr.Ref));
this doesn't feel correct, mainly because we're not using the value ofpublic static bool operator !=(object? lh, PTRMUTPTR<T> rh) => lh == null ? (void*)rh != null : true;
lh, we're just null checkingshould bepublic MUT(ref readonly T @Ref)
ref T PCPCPPCP
KMAKPAPPPPMP
objectMMK== operators in the prototype that take object? only check for nullPobject? operator, which fine i guess it wasn't part of the original proposal but i see no harmPnullnullptr existsMMMMPPif (ptr == (object?)null)if (ptr == nullptr)nullSilk.NET.Everything.RunGame("a twin stick shooter where the player shoots cuboids and they explode into smaller cuboids"); public static implicit operator void***(PTRMUTPTR<T> ptr) => (void***)Unsafe.AsPointer(ref Unsafe.AsRef(in ptr.Ref)); public static bool operator !=(object? lh, PTRMUTPTR<T> rh) => lh == null ? (void*)rh != null : true;lh public MUT(ref readonly T @Ref)ref Tobject==object?object?nullptrSilk.NET.Everything.RunGame();