spans also don't work well for double ptr cases, which can be either lists of lists or a ptr to plac
spans also don't work well for double ptr cases, which can be either lists of lists or a ptr to place a single object (DX has this a lot)
Kyeah
Ayou'll never please everyone - last time i checked opentk was completely safe and i've not seen too many complaints about that (i use opentk as an example as i used it for a good year or so before switching to silk)
personally i can't see a time when you'd want to mix and match - you either use unsafe or safe
so silk could be the safer alternative to terrafx for example
personally i can't see a time when you'd want to mix and match - you either use unsafe or safe
so silk could be the safer alternative to terrafx for example
Afair point
Myou'll never please everyonebut when both sides are really angry, it's annoying
Kyeah having this as a safe way to handle jagged arrays and ref to pointer situations is why I'm most interested
Kthat and the new implementation of silkmarshal since that rules for strings
Mi'm only here because i didn't know what terrafx was and perks is a friend
KI'm here for the overloads and the general offtopic channel tbh
Mi thought we settled on implicit casts for overloading and it worked reasonably well?
Kyeah that's this
Pwe didn't settle, this is just us pursuing a prototype
DI don't know why I'm here. 
Pnone of this has been formally agreed
Ai'm here because i enjoyed that silk offered a lot more options than opentk
i didn't care for unsafe initially
and i'm currently trying to play devil's advocate, that is all
and i'm trying to come at this objectively, subjectively my opinions are somewhat different to what i am saying
i didn't care for unsafe initially
and i'm currently trying to play devil's advocate, that is all
and i'm trying to come at this objectively, subjectively my opinions are somewhat different to what i am saying
Myeah but it's good enough
Poh yeah no it's appreciated
Mall bureaucracy aside, i don't see any way of doing this in practicality that isn't the cast system
Kunless we get ref struct as generics and as ref fields
Kin which case it becomes a lot easier
CNot to derail too much, but for the string conversions, going to strings is expected just to be explicit from a function right (need for array sizes), and then implicit from string arrays to our types?
Pimplicit from string/string array, explicit to string, to string array has to be a function
Pwith the ReadToString/ReadToStringArray functions as appropriate
Cokay, sounds good
Pperhaps because you want to gaslight people into thinking pineapple on pizza is okay 
yeah i saw your nickname change 
/s
yeah i saw your nickname change /sDIt's been like this for ages on another server. I decided to make it the same everywhere 
CSo this code block gives me the following error, but I do have a constructor (public MutMut(ref Mut @Ref)). Any ideas how to fix this?
Fody/InlineIL: Type Silk.NET.Core.MutMut has no constructor with signature (Silk.NET.Core.Mut) (in Silk.NET.Core.MutMut Silk.NET.Core.MutMut::op_Implicit(System.Byte*[]) at instruction IL_0053: call System.Void InlineIL.IL/Emit::Newobj(InlineIL.MethodRef))
Kneed to makebyreftype the mut in the constructor specification
Kref mut and mut are diff types
CMakes sense, seems to have worked. Thank you!
C@Perksey What do the ConstAny and Any types map to with the new types?
Pthey’re equivalent to the non-generic ones
Cokay that's what I thought. What are the generation steps, I need to regenerate GLFW.
Pshould just be a case of running SilkTouchX with the test.json path as an argument (oh and add “—skip Windows” or whatever it’s called in test.json, as that will take forever
Cokay got it running but it didn't generate anything
P-l debug?
P(you could also do trace but that may be excessive)
Cin either case it just looks like it is doing no work
C
Phmmm, do you have submodules initialised
Cyup
Pmaybe crank it up to trace?
Cthat is on trace
Poh
Pthis is so strange
PI mean it’s probably a case of ClangSharp not running
Pbut how it gets to that point is a mystery
Cokay I guess I'll go down the debug rabbit hole and see if I can figure out what's going wrong
Punless it’s to do with the working directory. I tried my best to make it read relative to the file but may have missed a few places
Cyeah so I'm definitely missing the clang response file
