ENo problem
J4,002,014 pulls!
EWasn't it 2 like a month ago?
C@EyeCantCU
C9 days, 450k
EWowza
C50k per day, many people have more than one machine, some don't auto update, etc... I'd guess roughly 30-40,000 people
JIs there a graph we could use to track numbers and correlate with press coverage?
JJall our historical data is there, just need to graph it
J@αchilleaς Putting this convo on your radar! https://universal-blue.discourse.group/t/what-is-universal-blue-doing-that-you-would-like-the-fedora-project-to-do-instead/218/5
Universal Blue
Thanks for these notes! Good to have a clear view on where Fedora can help. That sounds like a great idea! I think the closest conversation so this idea has been the topic of removing Firefox from the atomic spins because so many people end up wanting the Flathub Firefox anyway. If folks are willing to drop the browser, I think there may be lo...
E@KyleGospo I feel like this is almost right. I've got to get off my computer for the night unfortunately
I had considered building it from source but their CI already does that. Plus releases would have to be pinned regardless. So I took the source tarball and tried to package it that way. The problem being auto setup tries to enter a directory that doesn't exist.
Spec is here:
https://github.com/EyeCantCU/devpod/blob/main/devpod.spec
Feel free to use it or completely repackage it in a way that makes more sense. I figured I'd try it since I said I would. Completely spaced on it until I saw it mentioned
Copr here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eyecantcu/DevPod/
I had considered building it from source but their CI already does that. Plus releases would have to be pinned regardless. So I took the source tarball and tried to package it that way. The problem being auto setup tries to enter a directory that doesn't exist.
Spec is here:
https://github.com/EyeCantCU/devpod/blob/main/devpod.spec
Feel free to use it or completely repackage it in a way that makes more sense. I figured I'd try it since I said I would. Completely spaced on it until I saw it mentioned
Copr here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eyecantcu/DevPod/
AYou can pass some arguments to customize what %auto setup does
ΑThanks. Things have gotten a bit hectic recently and priorities are shifting, but there's cool stuff coming.
EYeah. Read up on them last night. None of them tell it to remain in the current directory. Will tackle it this morning
AYou could try something wild like
%autosetup -n .AOr maybe
%autosetup -c mmEI'll give it a go. Thank you!
EThat worked! But ack:
error: Checkout devpod-v0.4.2-1.fc39.x86_64: Hardlinking 15/10c2874e5e606e06544cf0cf70d0645b4e51226bb78e4649b9a59243adc189.file to xdg-open: File existsEExtracted the last RPM built for DevPod and it excludes the xdg-open binary as well as the glib-2.0 schemes... Will exclude those in the spec
EOkay, building again. I think this is it!
Erpm-ostree install https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eyecantcu/DevPod/fedora-39-x86_64/06741455-devpod/devpod-v0.4.2-1.fc39.x86_64.rpmEWorks perfectly. Again, unsure if this is how we should package it though
AI can review your spec
AMaybe we should file an issue to ask why glib and xdg-open are in the release tarball
AThat doesn’t seem right at all
EThat would be great
EI'll look around first then file just to be sure. I extracted the last RPM published (one of the 0.4.0 alphas) and they weren't there. Seems off
ATry extracting the tarball manually
AMaybe it’s just tarball being messed up
EI have - they're in the tarball :/
ASounds like a bug
AGitHub
Codespaces but open-source, client-only and unopinionated: Works with any IDE and lets you use any cloud, kubernetes or just localhost docker. - loft-sh/devpod
EI'll open a PR that adds them as excludes
AGreat work 
EI appreciate the help with this. Thank you so much. I wouldn't have thought to do that otherwise
EPR opened
AGlad to help 
Kgreat work you guys, this is excellent
EThank you! PR was just merged too
J
Jyou made the prerelease notes!
J
Jhuh, check this out
LThis might be what I need! 
Jyeah I think @EyeCantCU would wanna see it too
APutting the flatpak installation inside the image means that those applications cannot be removed nor updated
LThat's OK, it's a purpose built image.
I'd use a general image otherwise
I'd use a general image otherwise
EThat's awesome!
