ok so 130*39=5070, which is close to 5200 which is the number of regularization images. Is that numb

ok so 130*39=5070, which is close to 5200 which is the number of regularization images. Is that number similarity a coincidence or is that what I'm aiming for, for the number of repeats multiplied by the number of images to be about equal to the number of reg images?
Was this page helpful?