ok so 130*39=5070, which is close to 5200 which is the number of regularization images. Is that numb
ok so 130*39=5070, which is close to 5200 which is the number of regularization images. Is that number similarity a coincidence or is that what I'm aiming for, for the number of repeats multiplied by the number of images to be about equal to the number of reg images?



