cloudflared tunnels might work for @andrewmurphy.io, _assuming_ he controls where the server stuff i
cloudflared tunnels might work for @andrewmurphy.io, assuming he controls where the server stuff is run.
AIt doesn't use an IP or custom port.
https://courses.techleaderslaunchpad.com/graphql
Awhy should I need to tunnel to a publicly accessible URL?
Dif you were running on a custom port or IP
Aah okay, i am not 
Aoh, it also works fine on the build. the same API endpoint is called on the cloudflare build
Aso cloudflare can access that API fine on its build servers, just not from a worker
KThe build runs outside of Cloudflare’s infrastructure and from different IPs.
KIt’s possible that the website blocks Workers
KGiven that it’s only talking to Cloudflare, probably not.
Ait's just a wordpress instance that i host, so I doubt it
KFetch it without a client and see what
await response.text() says.Awhat do you mean "without a client" ?
Aoh, you mean without apollo, just a fetch request
Agood idea, now i need to learn how to use fetch to make a graphql call 
K
KPersonally, it just tries to take me to a captcha - which a Worker can't do.
Aohhh, it'll be my hosting provider doing "smart" stuff. let me see if i can turn it off
Ajust confirmed you're right
<html><head><link rel="icon" href="data:;"><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0;/.well-known/sgcaptcha/?r=%2Fgraphql&y=ipr:2a06:98c0:3600::103:1703826118.917"></meta></head></html> bny doing the raw fetch thing. now to work out how to get my hosting provider to turn that offAas a rubbish work around I could at build time generate a static file with data from the endpoint and use that from the worker, but that's a bad solution
Dwoot woot, I see it working!
All the requests I just did in IAD (Google Cloud Run), are returning cached responses (just like they did for me in MIA).
All the requests I just did in IAD (Google Cloud Run), are returning cached responses (just like they did for me in MIA).
Dnoice
SSiteground blocks all Workers and you can only work around it by going through a proxy. They will not whitelist it for you
SBtw save yourself the headache of trying to get them to unblock it for you, they are absolutely worthless
Kctx.waitUntil, ctx being the third arg to the fetch handler
Kit’s non-blocking (pass it a promise, no await) and will extend the lifetime of the Worker by 30s after the response is returned
Kdo it before
Kit’s basically fire and forget
Kdon’t await waitUntil and don’t await anything you pass to it
DIs 24ms the time it took for the cancel to be issued, or for my waitUntil to be finished?
-does deploying workers cost you anything?
Ehi there! I'm coming from Vercel, where I can set
I deployed the same API on CloudfarePages/Workers and it didn't take effect.. my quota is on 90%
I also tried to setup a Cache Rule at domain level, but don't take effect.. I'm using Hono.. can someone share an example of Functions Cache?
thanks in advance!
s-max-age: {seconds} and my functions are cached, so my quota is not fully used..I deployed the same API on CloudfarePages/Workers and it didn't take effect.. my quota is on 90%
I also tried to setup a Cache Rule at domain level, but don't take effect.. I'm using Hono.. can someone share an example of Functions Cache?
thanks in advance!
Ethanks! so i'd like to setup on Worker's side.. I'm using Hono.. should I use
s-max-age? or maxage?E(on Vercel it was
s-max-age)Eups sorry now I understand
Eso there is no option like Funcions Caching on Vercel?
Eyeah, I want to prevent that.. ok thanks so much!
POn the quick edit page, does anyone know how to stop it from automatically running every time you make a change?
Splease someone help me
Splease
Sanyone
Si have a problem with warp
SCF_DNS_PROXY_FAILURE
Pone more question, I am trying to make a worker that redirects to my site while setting a header. Here is what I have:
return Response.redirect("https://example.com/", 303).headers.append("testHeader", "test");
when that runs, it says in the logs "Can't modify immutable headers." Is there any way to do this?
edit: nvm, I figured it out
return Response.redirect("https://example.com/", 303).headers.append("testHeader", "test");
when that runs, it says in the logs "Can't modify immutable headers." Is there any way to do this?
edit: nvm, I figured it out
PWhat happens if I try to upload a non-image file to Cloudflare Images? I'm wondering what kind of validation i need to do once the form is submitted to make sure users aren't trying to upload arbitrary file types.
Phow long can I have a client connect to a websocket on a worker?
POk, yeah I have a project already that uses #durable-objects with the hibernate API, works great. I was just trying to test the limits of the worker by itself, if I do not need multiplayer sync then might not need the Durable Object setup. I rant a test and was connected to the WS for over 20 min. the 30 CPU seconds might be tough to track...
UFwiw you still have to pay for all the bandwidth used even when things are cached on vercel. Even for fairly small responses cloudflare can still be cheaper especially depending on the cache hit ratio. (Cloudflare pages also allows you to serve static content completely free with no usage limits)
as an example tho vercel charges $0.40/GB of bandwidth
If you have a response that is 3KB served 1 million times that would add up to 3GB of bandwidth which costs $1.20 on vercel.
That same 3KB response 1 million times on cloudflare workers (lets say with 5ms CPU time to serve) would cost $0.40 on cloudflare ($0.30 for the requests + $0.10 for the CPU time).
as an example tho vercel charges $0.40/GB of bandwidth
If you have a response that is 3KB served 1 million times that would add up to 3GB of bandwidth which costs $1.20 on vercel.
That same 3KB response 1 million times on cloudflare workers (lets say with 5ms CPU time to serve) would cost $0.40 on cloudflare ($0.30 for the requests + $0.10 for the CPU time).
AIs there any way to add a WAF rate limiting rule via code (is there any API)? I may want to block some API keys if they miss a payment
