I personally feel it is better that way, as the header "`From:`" is technically a "personalization"

I personally feel it is better that way, as the header "

From:

From:

From:

From:" is technically a "personalization" just like other headers such as e.g. "

To:

To:

To:

To:", "

Subject:

Subject:

Subject:

Subject:", and so forth.

I'm actually starting to wonder if the outer

from:

from:

from:

from:/

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom: are technically synonyms of each other, e.g. both being the

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom:, as that would somehow make better sense.

Interesting fact is also no matter if it is

from:

from:

from:

from:/

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom: in the outer area, or the

from:

from:

from:

from: under

personalizations:

personalizations:

personalizations:

personalizations:, they all seem to indicate the optional friendly

name:

name:

string, which the actual SMTP MAIL FROM (

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom:

mailfrom:) / Envelope From / Bounce address doesn't have.

That friendly

name:

name:

only makes sense for the

bcc:

bcc:

bcc:

bcc:/

cc:

cc:

cc:

cc:/

from:

from:

from:

from:/

reply_to:

reply_to:

reply_to:

reply_to:/

to:

to:

to:

to: within

personalizations:

personalizations:

personalizations:

personalizations:, if you ask me.

And with

bcc:

bcc:

bcc:

bcc:, it depends quite much on how their system is handling the

bcc:

bcc:

bcc:

bcc: though.

DarkDeviLOP•2/27/24, 3:55 AM

I would also say that having headers:headers:,

reply_to:

reply_to:

and subject:subject: both in the outer area, as well as the inner

personalizations:

personalizations:

area makes absolutely no sense either.

DDarkDeviL I personally feel it is better that way, as the header "`From:`" is technically ...

addison•2/27/24, 3:56 AM

I did actually test and the outer from isn't an alias of mailfrom, it just does the same thing as the inner from

addison•2/27/24, 3:56 AM

there's definitely a lot of weird decisions made

DarkDeviLOP•2/27/24, 4:05 AM

Thanks for also testing that!

DarkDeviLOP•2/27/24, 4:06 AM

And

to that weird decision part.

Mongy•2/27/24, 5:50 AM

is there a way i can run a worker only once after being deployed?

Mongy•2/27/24, 5:50 AM

i was thinking i could use cron expression to be run on the same date being deployed but i was curious if there might be other methods

MMongy is there a way i can run a worker only once after being deployed?

Hello, I’m Allie!•2/27/24, 6:28 AM

Put a WAF rule on the route that checks for a certain header, then hit that URL?

Hello, I’m Allie!•2/27/24, 6:39 AM

Or validate it in the Worker, then undeploy it afterward

net2income•2/27/24, 7:56 AM

Hi Bosses, anyone knows if i can run python FastApi code on a worker? thanks

Nnet2income Hi Bosses, anyone knows if i can run python FastApi code on a worker? thanks

Hello, I’m Allie!•2/27/24, 7:57 AM

Not at the moment

HHello, I’m Allie!Not at the moment

net2income•2/27/24, 7:57 AM

thanks boss

HHello, I’m Allie!Or validate it in the Worker, then undeploy it afterward

Mongy•2/27/24, 8:03 AM

So Im looking to use github actions to deploy the worker. The worker repo will also contain files to be put into a D1. Was looking to see if I can configure the worker so it just runs one time and i guess in some way shut off. For every new merge to main, it will contain new files to be stored into a D1 which github actions will take over again and fill the database through the worker.

MMongy So Im looking to use github actions to deploy the worker. The worker repo will a...

Hello, I’m Allie!•2/27/24, 8:04 AM

For a one-off like that, would it maybe be easier to just call the D1 API directly?

Mongy•2/27/24, 8:04 AM

using wrangler locally

Mongy•2/27/24, 8:04 AM

MMongy using wrangler locally

Hello, I’m Allie!•2/27/24, 8:05 AM

No, in the Action

Hello, I’m Allie!•2/27/24, 8:05 AM

You don't even have to use

wrangler

wrangler

. You can make the API calls with your HTTP-client of choice

Mongy•2/27/24, 8:09 AM

Ah, I can do that

Mongy•2/27/24, 8:10 AM

Appreciate it

luhuhukas•2/27/24, 9:54 AM

Has anyone tried to develop gRPC services with workers? Is this possible?

Kuuba_•2/27/24, 11:23 AM

Hello.
Any idea how to fix #No such module "node:buffer". imported from "worker.js" ?

impairedFelon•2/27/24, 12:26 PM

Worker JS Runtime doesn't supports node crypto completely, whats gonna happen if i use Python? Will worker support Python's Crypto libraries?
Also i can't use Firebase Admin SDK with Js Runtime, can i use that in Python?

Talaat•2/27/24, 2:29 PM

Hello
is anyone able to use "workers"
seems down as well as the Dashboard.

Talaat•2/27/24, 2:29 PM

TTalaat Hello is anyone able to use "workers" seems down as well as the Dashboard.

Cyb3r-Jak3•2/27/24, 2:30 PM

Team is aware and they are working on a status page

Talaat•2/27/24, 2:30 PM

thank you

Walshy•2/27/24, 2:36 PM

#cloudflare-status

HHello, I’m Allie!You don't even have to use `wrangler`. You can make the API calls with your HTTP...

Mongy•2/27/24, 4:27 PM

hey, after looking through github actions and wrangler actions, I think i may of gotten more confused with this comment hahahaha. The idea im having is to create a worker that will parse a folder within itself containing mdx files to store into a D1. The workflow goal is to push to the main branch of the worker repo with new mdx files where in turn the worker will re-deploy and add them to D1. The mdx files will be pulled from D1 by a client application to display them.

Electric•2/27/24, 4:37 PM

how do I connect my my workers with a github repo?

EElectric how do I connect my my workers with a github repo?

Chaika•2/27/24, 4:38 PM

There's no special integration for it, no CI/CD like Pages has if that's what you're looking for

CChaika There's no special integration for it, no CI/CD like Pages has if that's what y...

Electric•2/27/24, 4:39 PM

so I can't use deploy or git on workers?

EElectric so I can't use deploy or git on workers?

Chaika•2/27/24, 4:40 PM

That statement is a bit too vague
If you mean literally having Workers run git, no
If you mean having automated deployments for Workers from Github, there's a github action you can use: https://github.com/cloudflare/wrangler-action

GitHub

GitHub - cloudflare/wrangler-action: 🧙‍♀️ easily deploy cloudflare ...

easily deploy cloudflare workers applications using wrangler and github actions - cloudflare/wrangler-action

GitHub - cloudflare/wrangler-action: 🧙‍♀️ easily deploy cloudflare ...

Santosh•2/27/24, 4:54 PM

Which discussion board do I ask for DNS related questions? I am trying to get naked domain(apex) to point to www. and for the heck of me I dont understand how to make this work even with a redirect rule. And followed several articles on google

SSantosh Which discussion board do I ask for DNS related questions? I am trying to get n...

Chaika•2/27/24, 4:55 PM

#general-help or #general-discussions

CChaika That statement is a bit too vague If you mean literally having Workers run git, ...

Electric•2/27/24, 4:57 PM

so I deployed doing wrangler but the code didn't change on the quick edit?