What do you mean by tenant in this case? Do you mean per-user worker?

U

Unsmart•3/7/24, 6:25 PM

My assumption was he wants users to be able to create their own DOs in a workers for platform script. Thats really the only thing you cant do with them per tenant. Would be pretty neat to be able to do

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•3/7/24, 6:29 PM

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fxuUbZLFlkrDyfM2VTTFZFwDaBtodjCAR1neM3UL714/edit?usp=sharing

Google Docs

[EXTERNAL] Durable Objects in namespaced scripts

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•3/7/24, 6:30 PM

D

DaniFoldi•3/7/24, 6:30 PM

oh wow that's now a thing

U

Unsmart•3/7/24, 6:54 PM

:PauseChamp:

U

Unsmart•3/7/24, 6:55 PM

This is huge

Ttanushree │ Workers PM What do you mean by tenant in this case? Do you mean per-user worker?

M

Matt Linkous•3/7/24, 7:50 PM

Yeah exactly. Each of our "tenants" will have exactly one user worker that is a durable object and it doesn't seem possible to calculate their individually used storage

MMatt Linkous Yeah exactly. Each of our "tenants" will have exactly one user worker that is a ...

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•3/7/24, 8:34 PM

Ideally you're able to use script name or assign unique class names and then filer by that in our GraphQL analytics. Doesn't look like we expose anything more granular than total account storage right now though.

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•3/7/24, 8:34 PM

Passing this feedback on to the DO PM

Ttanushree │ Workers PM Passing this feedback on to the DO PM

M

Matt Linkous•3/7/24, 8:37 PM

Thanks! That would be helpful. We do have a unique class name per DO but as far as I can tell that still doesn't allow us to calculate storage per DO

MMatt Linkous Thanks! That would be helpful. We do have a unique class name per DO but as far ...

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•3/7/24, 8:55 PM

I hear that this is coming in Q2. It's been highly requested

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•3/7/24, 8:57 PM

Question for this group — would you be interesting in sharing you’ve built or are building with WFP

We’re gearing up to release WFP down plan. So far it’s been restricted to enterprise customers + special access to our discord community. You all are so creative and I was hoping to highlight ways our community is using WFP!

Putting a feeler out there for how many of you would be interested. Can you react to this messaging if its something you would be up for

A

Abdallah Abis•3/13/24, 9:09 PM

Hey Folks,
Can a user worker be a consumer of a queue? if so how can I configure it?
using this configures the user worker as a producer, but not a consumer.

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

{
  "type": "queue",
  "name": "<TEST_QUEUE>",
  "queue_name": "<TEST_QUEUE_NAME>"
}

AAbdallah Abis Hey Folks, Can a user worker be a consumer of a queue? if so how can I configure...

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•3/14/24, 8:21 PM

Asking internally. Wil follow up!

AAbdallah Abis Hey Folks, Can a user worker be a consumer of a queue? if so how can I configure...

A

Acе•3/15/24, 9:35 AM

It is not possible. Queue consumers are actually setup by wrangler during deploy. You can only use a regular worker. Maybe tanushree has some other options for you though

R

rook•3/17/24, 4:25 PM

hi, with WFP is it possible to place a worker in a fixed location? outside of using smart placement.

R

rook•3/17/24, 6:26 PM

i know you can pick the location for vercel edge functions and iirc they are built on workers.

U

Unsmart•3/17/24, 6:27 PM

You cannot, vercel doesnt route to cloudflare first they route to their AWS servers so they will just route to the region they want on AWS then call cloudflare

R

rook•3/17/24, 6:44 PM

are there plans to enable this? workers would be so good if picking a location was possible. right now it's so slow to call a db or api, if you aren't close to them already. smart placement does not fix this.

Rrook are there plans to enable this? workers would be so good if picking a location w...

C

Chaika•3/17/24, 6:48 PM

why doesn't smart placement fix that?
Probably should move to #workers-discussions
You can create a D1 db in a specific region and bind your worker to it, enable smart placement, and it'll always run close

CChaika why doesn't smart placement fix that? Probably should move to #workers-discussio...

R

rook•3/17/24, 6:59 PM

moved it there

Ttanushree │ Workers PM Asking internally. Wil follow up!

A

Abdallah Abis•3/19/24, 4:49 PM

Thanks @tanushree │ Workers PM !
Any updates?

L

Luke•3/20/24, 11:20 AM

Hi everyone, working on an app and would love to get access to WFP to be able to publish workers for different users of the app. Is it possible to request access here, I'm more than happy to provide feedback to product team.

C

cosbgn•3/21/24, 2:49 PM

Hey does anyone knows how to upload a script via API?

I'm trying:

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

const main = `
export default {
    fetch(request) {
        return new Response('Hello World');
    }
} 
`
const metadata = JSON.stringify({ main_module: "main.js" })
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main.js', new Blob([main], { type: 'application/javascript+module' }))
formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))
return await $fetch(`${baseUrl}/namespaces/timo/scripts/hello`, { method:"PUT", body:formData, headers })

And I keep getting:

"could not read content for part metadata"

"could not read content for part metadata"

"could not read content for part metadata"

"could not read content for part metadata"

Ccosbgn Hey does anyone knows how to upload a script via API? I'm trying: ```js const...

C

Chaika•3/21/24, 2:58 PM

iirc

formData.append('metadata.json', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))

should be

formData.append('metadata', new Blob([metadata], { type: 'application/json' }))

C

cosbgn•3/21/24, 3:04 PM

Great, using file an metadata it now works:

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

const formData = new FormData();
formData.append('main', new File([main], 'main.js', { type: 'application/javascript+module' }));
    formData.append('metadata', new File([metadata], 'metadata.json', { type: 'application/json' }));

Thanks a lot

Ttanushree │ Workers PM ❓ Question for this group — would you be interesting in sharing you’ve built or...

C

cosbgn•3/22/24, 5:43 PM

Sent you a DM

N

Nick Randall•3/27/24, 8:21 PM

Hello! Anybody know if it's possible to CNAME a custom domain to the domain of a worker published to "workers for platforms"? Basically I want to CNAME "www.fancydomain.com" -> "fancyapp.dispatcher.domain.com" where the dispatch worker is tied to

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

*.dispatcher.domain.com/*

NNick Randall Hello! Anybody know if it's possible to CNAME a custom domain to the domain of a...

D

DaniFoldi•3/27/24, 8:39 PM

Hey! For something like that I think you'll need to use Custom Hostnames from Cloudflare for SaaS, and have your dispatcher worker respond to

*/*

*/*

*/*

*/* routes

R

rob•4/3/24, 9:00 PM

can you bind KV /d1 etc to a worker via API calls or do you need to use the toml file for that

Rrob can you bind KV /d1 etc to a worker via API calls or do you need to use the toml...

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/3/24, 11:13 PM

API calls, and in fact for Workers for Platforms (different from regular Workers) that's the only way to bind things to user workers.

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/3/24, 11:13 PM

For regular Workers you can also do it via API.

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/3/24, 11:14 PM

Keep in mind in both cases it will result in a redeploy of your Worker so it might take a few seconds to propagate globally/your worker will be reset.

IIsaac McFadyen API calls, and in fact for Workers for Platforms (different from regular Workers...

R

rob•4/3/24, 11:22 PM

yah its for WfP so i could deploy then bind , i cant deploy with things binded already

R

rob•4/3/24, 11:22 PM

ty

T

tanushree │ Workers PMOP•4/5/24, 2:26 PM

Big WFP announcement today

https://blog.cloudflare.com/browser-rendering-api-ga-rolling-out-cloudflare-snippets-swr-and-bringing-workers-for-platforms-to-our-paygo-plans

TLDR: WFP is coming down to our paid plan on April 16th!

The Cloudflare Blog

Browser Rendering API GA, rolling out Cloudflare Snippets, SWR, and...

Browser Rendering API is now available to all paid Workers customers with improved session management

S

schmime•4/5/24, 4:31 PM

Hi friends, new to workers for platforms! What is the story on letting users manage secrets for their workers they upload? Like if my user wants to access their own database from their worker what is best practice for managing that? Thank you for the help!

B

Bryan•4/5/24, 4:48 PM

Very happy to see Workers for Platforms will be available to everyone!

I want to build a multi-tenant service with Workers for Platforms, but I don't know what I should do with the database.

I have two options: One D1 database for all customers and One D1 database for each customer.

For the first option, I think there will be challenges for data security and I think the size will grow over 10GB quickly (since what I want to do is heavy on data).

For the second option, there are two problems. First, each account can only have 5000 D1 databases, and I think I will go over this limit since I will offer a free tier service. I also found it's not easy to dynamically create D1 database and attach it to my worker script. Second, If one day I need to do a database migration, I will have to do the migration for all databases, and it'll definitely not be easy.

Do you have any suggestions for what I should do?

BBryan Very happy to see Workers for Platforms will be available to everyone! I want t...

U

Unsmart•4/5/24, 5:52 PM

Currently durable objects are the best tenant based db you can use. D1 is still working on exposing easier tenant based structure.

U

Unsmart•4/5/24, 5:54 PM

and fwiw the database limit on d1 can easily be raised (its also 50k not 5k)

R

rob•4/5/24, 8:42 PM

How do you assign worker routes to a customer's domain, if they add their domain (we set it via Cloudflare for SaaS ) Can we then add Worker Routes to the custom domain they added

Rrob How do you assign worker routes to a customer's domain, if they add their domain...

U

Unsmart•4/5/24, 10:32 PM

If you want all customer domains to go to the same worker its pretty easy just gotta add these 3 worker routes (https://dash.cloudflare.com/?to=/:account/:zone/workers):

<zone-name>/*

<zone-name>/*

<zone-name>/*

<zone-name>/* Service:

None

None

*.<zone-name>/*

*.<zone-name>/*

*.<zone-name>/*

*.<zone-name>/* Service:

None

None

*/*

*/*

*/*

*/* Service:

<worker to route to>

<worker to route to>

<worker to route to>

<worker to route to>

Example:

U

Unsmart•4/5/24, 10:35 PM

If you only want to specify a specific customers domain then you would just enter their domain in the workers routes.

mycustomer.com/*

mycustomer.com/*

mycustomer.com/*

mycustomer.com/* Service:

my-worker-for-customer

my-worker-for-customer

my-worker-for-customer

my-worker-for-customer

Note that you can only have like 3,000 worker routes defined iirc

K

kian•4/6/24, 11:22 PM

The same as Wrangler, you bundle it (i.e with esbuild) before uploading it

K

Kai•4/7/24, 1:30 PM

Hello, about the pricing for individual scripts, my assumption is the pricing covers storage of the worker code. is this correct?

K

Kai•4/7/24, 1:32 PM

if that is the case, has the idea of more fine grained pricing for the storage that the workers take been brought up? I'm imagining a pricing model of
x per 1GB instead of x per script.

U

Unsmart•4/7/24, 4:40 PM

A static cost per script is easier to calculate which is why it’s that way

UUnsmart A static cost per script is easier to calculate which is why it’s that way

K

Kai•4/8/24, 3:34 AM

yeah makes sense, thanks

K

Kai•4/8/24, 4:57 AM

~~is the cost per script pro-rated?~~

If i create a user script and delete it after a week does that incur the whole 0.02 charge?

What do you mean by tenant in this case? Do you mean per-user worker?

Similar Threads