cuz bazzite doesn't have distrobox 1.7.1 which has a bug fix that i really need
cuz bazzite doesn't have distrobox 1.7.1 which has a bug fix that i really need
Vsilverblue nvidia does however
Vany info on when 1.7.1 could be expected
Vcuz the bug leads to the containers straight up crashing when installing software inside
Vgetting sigkilled to be more precise
V@Niklas 
Someone (I think) recommending Aurora in the wild 
Someone (I think) recommending Aurora in the wild 
KLol :D
I was also tempted to try the traditional ublue images
I was also tempted to try the traditional ublue images
VThe verdict is quite sweet, great video
VI love to see people with that same enthusiasm that the people in this discord do
KI also enjoyed it! And I'm happy to use bazzite ^^
But what I still don't get ... how does bazzite have a tiny bit less performance (on desktop PCs)
I also read about the various patches + steam is included in the base image, no flatpak and there is a little bit less performance.. even all the kernel patches and the system76 schedeuler
do you know why?
But what I still don't get ... how does bazzite have a tiny bit less performance (on desktop PCs)
I also read about the various patches + steam is included in the base image, no flatpak and there is a little bit less performance.. even all the kernel patches and the system76 schedeuler
do you know why?
K-
In my testing debian and bazzite perform the same
In my testing debian and bazzite perform the same
NYeah awesome to see it slowly getting bigger
NAlso enabled F40 today, aside from ptyxis not installing in the image building process everything works (as far as I have tested)
Vbazzite :stable images are the freshest there is right
NYes
Vokay thx
FManaged to preserve all of my games. I’ll look into migrating more later.
Edoes bazzite include goverlay 1.0 and if not is there anyway i could add it?
Honce fedora 40 releases i know it will be 1.0 from what i heard
currently it is 0.9-5 for bazzite
currently it is 0.9-5 for bazzite
Ewill it be a pretty seemless upgrade from bazzite 39 do you think?
Has seamless as just updating
Hsince the process is identical
Egotcha thanks, looking forward to fedora 40, lots of goodies for me, gnome 46, goverlay 1.0
Hhowever if you are rebased to lets say a timestamped image or
bazzite:39 you will have to manually rebase to bazzite:latest or bazzite:stable (both of these are the same but people kept trying to use "stable" instead of "latest")NIsn’t stable the one you’re supposed to use now?
Hthey are both the same
Hstable is an alias to latest
NI see
Heither way default isntalls will always be on the
bazzite:latest/bazzite:stable image so updates to fedora n+1 will be automaticEfedora 40 releases this month?
Hapril 16th unless they push it back (which did happen with fedora 39)
EWasn’t the beta pushed back? So I’m thinking we may see some delays but I hope not
Hhopefully not, but things change. it is to be expected
EDang, what’s the secure boot password for bazzite again?
Nublue-os
EThanks
EWhat did you guys do about that SSH malicious code injection?
Hnot affected
Honly affected fedora 40 and 41 builds
Hbazzite is *checks notes* 39
EAh ok cool I hope that gets resolved soon
Hit already was patched
Has in the affected distros (at least the known ones) have already patched it
AAlso only debian was ever affected as it specifically targeted debian
AWhy yes I did rock the exploit on my arch pcs for a solid month
AIn a classic turn of events, the attacker did not deal with endianness correctly
AHappens to the best of us
ASo he got busted on an arm something debian server? Need to verify that
AJust like plugging in usbs, you have to plug it in wrong at least twice
Ethanks for explaining, im not very versed in linux and it helps me to understand when critical things like this happen
RThere's a ujust command to use distrobox-git
