my understanding is that the spam channel stuff had been fixed after forcing the requirements of dom

my understanding is that the spam channel stuff had been fixed after forcing the requirements of domain lockdown records on your domain.

as for direct solution, I reached out to mailchannels directly as from some debugging it seems that it was an issue on their side

Aaddison my understanding is that the spam channel stuff had been fixed after forcing the...

James•4/7/24, 6:54 PM

it was "fixed", yeah, if you add that. Their approach to the situation though has still been very poor, and until recently, you were able to signup on their site for $80 and send verified emails from most of their customers like boston.govboston.gov, because mailchannels don't implement any sender verification

James•4/7/24, 6:54 PM

To this day, they haven't acknowledged the seriousness of the issue, nor alerted their customers afaik. I would heavily advise against using them for any purpose

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:22 PM

interesting

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:22 PM

would really prefer not moving to SES but ill have to look into it

James•4/7/24, 7:26 PM

Sendgrid is also a great option

James•4/7/24, 7:26 PM

Postmark too

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:27 PM

postmark and sendgrid are way out of budget for what im building unfortunately

James•4/7/24, 7:27 PM

Realistically anything other than MailChannels. I've not seen any other provider not do basic domain sender verification

xet7•4/7/24, 7:29 PM

Is there discussion channel for CloudFlare Calls ?

Xxet7 Is there discussion channel for CloudFlare Calls ?

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/7/24, 7:30 PM

Not at the moment

xet7•4/7/24, 7:31 PM

What secret I need to add here?

wrangler secret put CALLS_APP_SECRET

wrangler secret put CALLS_APP_SECRET

https://github.com/cloudflare/orange

GitHub

GitHub - cloudflare/orange

Contribute to cloudflare/orange development by creating an account on GitHub.

xet7•4/7/24, 7:32 PM

[ERROR] A request to the Cloudflare API failed[ERROR] A request to the Cloudflare API failed

Xxet7 `[ERROR] A request to the Cloudflare API failed`

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/7/24, 7:33 PM

You would paste the ID and Key you got from https://dash.cloudflare.com/?to=/:account/calls

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:37 PM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/calls/example-architecture/
looks like the example image and numbers dont match up

Cloudflare Docs

Example architecture · Cloudflare Calls docs

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:38 PM

and also i believe there is a typo on https://developers.cloudflare.com/calls/https-api/#lifecycle-of-a-simple-session

"Remote Client Joints" instead of "Remote Client Joins"

Cloudflare Docs

Connection API · Cloudflare Calls docs

Cloudflare Calls simplifies the management of peer connections and media tracks through HTTPS API endpoints. These endpoints allow developers to …

Aaddison https://developers.cloudflare.com/calls/example-architecture/ looks like the exa...

James•4/7/24, 7:38 PM

what doesn't match up? seems fine to me on a quick read

JJames what doesn't match up? seems fine to me on a quick read

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/7/24, 7:38 PM

The 6 bubble is in Admin, which is list item 4

Aaddison and also i believe there is a typo on https://developers.cloudflare.com/calls/ht...

James•4/7/24, 7:38 PM

good catch! You might want to open up a docs PR/issue: https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-docs/blob/production/content/calls/https-api.md

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:38 PM

5 in the image is 6 in the bottom area
admin bubble is 6 when it should be 4

James•4/7/24, 7:39 PM

ah yeah, also good catch

James•4/7/24, 7:39 PM

a docs issue would be best for that

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:40 PM

will do

HHello, I’m Allie!You would paste the ID and Key you got from https://dash.cloudflare.com/?to=/:ac...

xet7•4/7/24, 7:42 PM

In what text format? I tried only secret value, VALUE=SECRET, etc

xet7•4/7/24, 7:43 PM

Enter a secret value:

xet7•4/7/24, 7:43 PM

It does not accept

xet7•4/7/24, 7:43 PM

API calls fail

Xxet7 In what text format? I tried only secret value, VALUE=SECRET, etc

addisonOP•4/7/24, 7:46 PM

when you use

wrangler secret put CALLS_APP_SECRET

wrangler secret put CALLS_APP_SECRET

you dont need to specify the value in the command. you will write the value when it asks for the secret value

xet7•4/7/24, 7:57 PM

ok. I needed add correct app ID, account ID etc, then it did work.

.gwapes•4/7/24, 8:02 PM

Trying to understand something with workers, if I am gonna rate limit my api, would it not be better to do this in a worker so it doesn’t hit my origin server at all?

.gwapes•4/7/24, 8:11 PM

Is there any good rate limit packages that work with itty router ?

James•4/7/24, 8:14 PM

I'm not sure about packages, but you might be interested in the new rate limiter bindings announced during dev week: https://blog.cloudflare.com/workers-production-safety#new-rate-limiting-api-in-workers

Walshy•4/7/24, 8:57 PM

the type is based on the extension of the path

Walshy•4/7/24, 8:57 PM

Since it's at request time that it's categorised

Walshy•4/7/24, 9:01 PM

The network tab shows requests and their responses, the category it puts it in is based on the request path (e.g.

is marked as a document,

/abc.js

/abc.js

is marked as js)

Things don't show up after a response, it's on request so there's no content-type available to use

Silent•4/7/24, 10:47 PM

Does returning response with status code 500 automatically send this page?
I can not tthink of anything else that could do this, the docs say its from a javascript exception but locally it runs fine no exceptions

kian•4/7/24, 10:49 PM

Does returning response with status code 500 automatically send this page?

Nope

Walshy•4/7/24, 11:32 PM

no there's an exception happening, check the logs - https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/observability/logging/real-time-logs/

naourass•4/8/24, 2:32 AM

In my local wrangler project that is not deployed (yet), is it possible to add a binding to some Worker that is already deployed (so I can make RPC calls from the local project to the deployed worker)?

my understanding is that the spam channel stuff had been fixed after forcing the requirements of dom

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads