for worker deployments probably bindings specific. I see plain worker deployments going through fine

for worker deployments probably bindings specific. I see plain worker deployments going through fine, but If you have a KV binding for example might fail since that API is dead dead

CChaika for worker deployments probably bindings specific. I see plain worker deployment...

Coalission•4/9/24, 2:45 AM

ah I see, yeah its giving the no healthy upstream error on the /storage/kv/namespaces API

i.wont.tell•4/9/24, 3:28 AM

dashboard is down now

avsaase•4/9/24, 9:24 AM

How do I use my production bindings when doing local development? When I run

npx wrangler dev --remote

npx wrangler dev --remote

I get this error

✘ [ERROR] In development, you should use a separate kv namespace than the one you'd use in production. Please create a new kv namespace with "wrangler kv:namespace create <name> --preview" and add its id as preview_id to the kv_namespace "KV_BINDING_NAME" in your wrangler.toml

✘ [ERROR] In development, you should use a separate kv namespace than the one you'd use in production. Please create a new kv namespace with "wrangler kv:namespace create <name> --preview" and add its id as preview_id to the kv_namespace "KV_BINDING_NAME" in your wrangler.toml

I appreciate that it's trying to protect me but I know what I'm doing and I need access to my prod kv.

avsaase•4/9/24, 9:38 AM

Alternatively, is there a way to create a local kv namespace that I can fill with the data that I need?

Aavsaase How do I use my production bindings when doing local development? When I run `np...

arch•4/9/24, 9:46 AM

Can't say for certain whether it would work, and this isn't an official recommendation, but could you just put the production ID as the preview ID in the wrangler.toml?

Aarch Can't say for certain whether it would work, and this isn't an official recommen...

avsaase•4/9/24, 9:47 AM

I found the same solution in the docs so I guess it is an official recommendation

johtso•4/9/24, 4:01 PM

Any reasons why I'd be getting "Error: internal error" when doing a fetch from my worker?

johtso•4/9/24, 4:25 PM

whenever I fetch a domain that doesn't exist I get an internal error

johtso•4/9/24, 4:25 PM

that doesn't seem right..

johtso•4/9/24, 4:32 PM

will see if it happens when deployed too

johtso•4/9/24, 4:35 PM

does not happen when deployed, only when running locally

johtso•4/9/24, 4:38 PM

miniflare issue?

Ichson•4/9/24, 5:00 PM

Hey anyone know the reason for not being able to connect to a websocket through a global scope?

Ichson•4/9/24, 5:01 PM

Just seems a little resource intensive to connect to websocket each request

IIchson Hey anyone know the reason for not being able to connect to a websocket through ...

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/9/24, 5:05 PM

Workers are started up, then snapshotted. If you were able to initialize a WebSocket in the global scope, it would be invalid, since the connection itself would no longer exist

HHello, I’m Allie!Workers are started up, then snapshotted. If you were able to initialize a WebSo...

Ichson•4/9/24, 5:06 PM

oh i see thank you

Ichson•4/9/24, 5:06 PM

i just realize i can implement a caching mechanism too

Ichson•4/9/24, 5:06 PM

so i can retrieve data faster

Jjohtso Any reasons why I'd be getting "Error: internal error" when doing a fetch from m...

Walshy•4/9/24, 5:11 PM

what's your account ID?

Walshy•4/9/24, 5:11 PM

oh local only

johtso•4/9/24, 5:11 PM

yeah

Walshy•4/9/24, 5:11 PM

Yeah report that on github

WWalshy Yeah report that on github

johtso•4/9/24, 5:13 PM

which repo would you suggest?

Walshy•4/9/24, 5:16 PM

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk and they can move if it needs to go elsewhere

JJames I'm not sure about packages, but you might be interested in the new rate limiter...

Kevin•4/9/24, 5:30 PM

How is the limiter controlled, or is it just total requests from all sources/origins against the entire worker/namespace?

James•4/9/24, 5:30 PM

reqs by namespace as far as I know, yes

WWalshy <https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk> and they can move if it needs to go ...

johtso•4/9/24, 5:37 PM

done: https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/5571

GitHub

🐛 BUG: Fetching a URL that doesn't exist triggers an "internal erro...

Which Cloudflare product(s) does this pertain to? Workers Runtime What version(s) of the tool(s) are you using? 3.48.0 [wrangler] What version of Node are you using? 21.7.1 What operating system an...

Piero512•4/9/24, 7:21 PM

Hey

Piero512•4/9/24, 7:21 PM

What do you guys suggest I should do?

Piero512•4/9/24, 7:22 PM

Today I noticed that I got a timeout on my webhook in my repo

Piero512•4/9/24, 7:22 PM

Most probably because the issuing server that does the request to my worker was slow

Piero512•4/9/24, 7:23 PM

and I consume the API of that same server

Piero512•4/9/24, 7:23 PM

I was thinking moving to queues but it's not free

Jjohtso It includes a serverless compatible copy of pdfjs

thanhle•4/9/24, 7:40 PM

it works but it keeps saying Worker exceeded CPU time limit.

Tthanhle it works but it keeps saying Worker exceeded CPU time limit.

johtso•4/9/24, 8:08 PM

When doing what?

Jjohtso When doing what?

thanhle•4/9/24, 8:11 PM

when I use the Unpdf package to extract the text from the pdf. maybe the CPU time for worker take long time to parse the whole pdf and extract the text

johtso•4/9/24, 8:11 PM

Right.. if you're doing a lot of work you might exceed the limits

johtso•4/9/24, 8:11 PM

Try splitting it up into tasks

Leon338•4/9/24, 9:10 PM

Will Worker to Worker communication (especially RPC Calls), be cheaper then normal Requests in the Future? I mean it's much less then a normal HTTP Request and should therefore be cheaper or not?

LLeon338 Will Worker to Worker communication (especially RPC Calls), be cheaper then norm...

Bulbasaur•4/9/24, 9:11 PM

It will, they've said they're making it free I think

Bulbasaur•4/9/24, 9:11 PM

for the request

LLeon338 Will Worker to Worker communication (especially RPC Calls), be cheaper then norm...

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/9/24, 9:11 PM

Under the hood, Worker-to-Worker coms are via Capn'Proto messages, so it can't get much cheaper

Bulbasaur•4/9/24, 9:11 PM

compute still costs, of course

Bulbasaur•4/9/24, 9:12 PM

(I could be wrong, please correct me)

Bulbasaur•4/9/24, 9:12 PM

I think I saw this in a tweet

Leon338•4/9/24, 9:13 PM

Thanks for the quick answers. @HardlyWorkin' but it's still less then a Request from Outside of the Cloudflare Network.

Leon338•4/9/24, 9:13 PM

The Request should be cheaper and compute time should still be charged ofc

LLeon338 Thanks for the quick answers. @HardlyWorkin' but it's still less then a Request ...

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/9/24, 9:14 PM

Oh, like that. Thought you were talking about something else sorry

BBulbasaur It will, they've said they're making it free I think

Leon338•4/9/24, 9:15 PM

I think it'll be cheaper otherwise no one would use the maybe announced Plugin Store ^^ bcs that would be hella expensive if i have like 10+ Plugins enabled

neoney•4/9/24, 9:16 PM

Which one is it?

✘ [ERROR] In development, you should use a separate kv namespace than the one you'd use in production. Please create a new kv namespace with "wrangler kv:namespace create <name> --preview" and add its id as preview_id to the kv_namespace "KV_BINDING_NAME" in your wrangler.toml

for worker deployments probably bindings specific. I see plain worker deployments going through fine

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads