Migration workflow with orm is work(messy). Because you generate the sql file and apply it using the
Migration workflow with orm is work(messy). Because you generate the sql file and apply it using the command line. Am I missing something?
MI am using drizzle orm
VIf I remember correctly:
- use drizzle-kit to generate .SQL
- run
wrangler d1 migrations list --localor--remoteto check if it's up
2b. if it's not, you might want to change migrations folder in wrangler.toml or drizzle config - run
wrangler d1 migrations apply
MThanks for detailed steps, I will give it a try!
Vmy drizzle config
Vand
drizzle-kit generate:sqlite script command for drizzle, instead of wrangler d1 migrations createMThis is much better!!!! Thank you
MAlso, studio is available??
MI can’t find any documentation for that too
HHi, I'm about to port my port my application to Cloudflare Workers, but when testing, I noticed that my page load times increased quite a lot in comparison to the current deployment using node on a VPS. I traced it down to D1 having quite a bit of query latency -
In this blog post https://blog.cloudflare.com/d1-turning-it-up-to-11#turning-it-up-to-11 I read something about 1.8ms which would be much better
Thanks in advance!
statement.run takes about 30 - 32ms for very simple queries (like adding or deleting a row to a table with 5 columns). Is that expected?In this blog post https://blog.cloudflare.com/d1-turning-it-up-to-11#turning-it-up-to-11 I read something about 1.8ms which would be much better
Thanks in advance!
The Cloudflare Blog
We've been heads down iterating on D1, and we've just shipped a major new version that's substantially faster, more reliable, and introduces Time Travel: the ability to restore a D1 database to any point in time.
HMakes sense - but would you expect 30ms round trip?
HThe 30ms is not from my local pc at home, but from the cloudflare worker to D1...
HI've set the location hint to EU, that's where I am, too. I just find it hard to believe that 30ms, because if your app is doing 10 round trips requests to the db, that would already sum up to 300ms...
CEU west or EU East?
HEU West
Chttps://where.durableobjects.live/region/weur so it could be in any one of those
Where Durable Objects Live
Tracking where Durable Objects are created, wherever you are in the world.
CIf you go to
/cdn-cgi/trace, ex: https://yourwebsite.com/cdn-cgi/trace, colo= the airport code of the location you hitCalthough I suppose that wouldn't be too helpful because we still have no clue where your DB ended up lol
CYou could be in Germany and the DB could be in Spain
Ceitherway there's going to be some network latency. You could enable Smart Placement on your worker bound to the database so that it tries to get placed "close" but the 1.92ms mentioned in the blog is purely just sqlite query procesing time
HOK, thanks for the info!
Mour perf isn't worth measuring before read replicas go live tbh
Ckind of a funny thing to say about a GA product
Cstill writes will have to go back to the main one anyway
Cand Smart Placement can help a great deal if you need to make more then one query
Mis it though? depends what GA means to you, i guess
CEven replication/performance aside, if we compare it to other offerings and typical use cases, the low storage limit becomes an issue. We're told D1 is different and wants a different approach (not unlike Turso), but then we're not given the tools to use that different approach on GA.
CKind of like ordering a cake, getting one of the slices and being told it's ready, and the rest will come later.. that's what beta is for, not GA
Cit's just kinda meh, I can forsee a lot of issues people using this "GA" product and being forced to use beta/alpha read-replicas or dynamic bindings to use it for a very typical use case, misaligned expectations
Kthere’s a d1 export command in Wrangler
Bwhat does it mean migrations are not run in production ?
Byou can migrate your prod db by providing
--remote flag
JThis is why marketing is so important to be explicit. Some people still believe to this day that D1 is (actually) globally distributed:
Reddit
Explore this conversation and more from the CloudFlare community
Jsadly, yes, same misleading marketing problem
JThen what does "Globally distributed" means here?
JYeah. It's globally distrubuted in the sense that I can create a DB in EU, US, etc. but individual DBs are not "distributed", or "replicated"
Jlol
JRead replication is coming, and was talked about briefly in https://blog.cloudflare.com/making-full-stack-easier-d1-ga-hyperdrive-queues, but it's not here yet
JIn the case of D1 i understand its upcoming
JBut for R2 thats a bad look
JNot the kind of thing i usually expect from Cloudflare, to be honest
Owhats the eta on d1 read replicas?
HYes, definitely. I enabled that and it solved my issue completely. Now the whole page load time is faster than on my VPS with a local mysql db.
BThe concept is that you should be giving each of your users (or system components) their own database for only their data, rather than having one huge database everyone's combined data is stored in. It's about changing the way you think about the data storage in your application.
Understandably the 10GB limit sounds small, but in reality it is a lot of space for a database. You can fit millions of records into it while remaining under the limit. My biggest db for example has 15 million records across 200 tables, and is just over 2.5 GB.
Understandably the 10GB limit sounds small, but in reality it is a lot of space for a database. You can fit millions of records into it while remaining under the limit. My biggest db for example has 15 million records across 200 tables, and is just over 2.5 GB.
Bjoins work in sqlite
BNo, it's not possible at the moment. There is an ATTACH command in sqlite which can load in more databases but D1 hasn't implemented it, and I doubt they'll add it
