BThat PR should just merge, but only after the package is promoted in rpmfusion, thus providing a clean build
EGotcha. I had retriggered the builds but then looking over at RPM Fusion - I'm not seeing it there. I noticed your link points to F39. Did they withdraw it?
Bno, it's never been in F39 updates, only their release... the update will show up when the new version is promoted
EMy bad, thanks for clarifying
Bit's all good
Banother detail, this tag will switch from "f39-free-updates-testing" to just "f39-free-updates" when promote
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=28538
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=28538
Bif you are really looking for stuff to do, i have an inflight PR which needs to be done for at least akmods/main/hwe, current approach is broken, but i have an idea (and it ties to a bigger picture issue)
https://github.com/ublue-os/akmods/pull/167
https://github.com/ublue-os/akmods/pull/167
MI moved wallpapers and pictures around. Bluefin stuff is under silverblue, Xe's stuff is still in shared. Created symlinks to the Wallpaper directory for Aurora. Removed the dracut file (that was being deleted when it shouldn't) and put the faces directory into silverblue. Additionally, started adding some logos for bluefin/aurora into place
Cmorning. Is the fleek bling stuff now deprecated? I saw the repo is archived as of a couple weeks ago.
Jfleek/nix is gone, but it's still around for brew bling
CCool. Thanks j0rge
M@j0rge added a bunch more logos for Aurora/Bluefin.
Do you have an svg of the favicom?
Do you have an svg of the favicom?
JI don't think so
Jmight need to make a new one
MOkay. I have the chicken as a logo right now, but favicom could be good for logo menu
Jthe contrast on the gdm screen and the dark grey could probably use a touch up, it's gonna look pretty good!
DHey, I'm looking to complete this issue https://github.com/ublue-os/config/issues/251 . How would I go about testing the code I have with the ujust command? Also for PR which file would be best for this? Thanks
GitHub
Similarly to ujust devmode and ujust toggle-nvk, let's make one that shows the branches for whatever image you're on and let's the user select: ujust toggle-release Current release: blu...
DOk I figured out how to test a file with what I have -
just --justfile test.justYepp and make sure it passes format check
DMight want to update the URL in the description for Pull Requests. Should be https://universal-blue.org/contributing.html I think.
J@Kyle Gospo did that redirect ever get deployed for /CONTRIBUTING?
KBelieve so
Jdoesn't appear to be working, should I wait or want me to just PR this ^
KGimme a bit I'll check
JGitHub
According to: fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker#477 (comment) fedora-silverblue/silverblue-docs#175 https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA#OSTree_.28Silverblue.2FKinoite.2Fetc.29 we apparently need to se...
Bi think travier has it in the correct place, since he's specifically suggesting a change to the
but the change could also get pulled into the initramfs stuff that is being worked on here: 💾ublue-dev`initramfs` discussion
ujust configure-nvidiabut the change could also get pulled into the initramfs stuff that is being worked on here: 💾ublue-dev`initramfs` discussion
Jack.
BB@j0rge what we didn't do is update any docs/references on website/forusm
JI can do the forum docs
Jbut one of you should do the announcement so I can refer to it, use the right words, etc.
B@Noel you want to do some image template PR? 
I am happy to help or just review before we actually post if you want
I am happy to help or just review before we actually post if you want
NI don't have time at the moment or tomorrow. Have folks over currently. May have time late tonight.
Bif I get to it, will post something .... cool?
NSounds good!
J11.5 million pulls, 12 will be noproblemo!
JI wonder if we'll hit 13 before or after F40
MUnsure if we can blacklist that via modprobe. I've added it as a karg. The specified karg in the write up is an actual karg and not one that is passed to modprobe
BOMG are you implying that rpmfusion's docs may be incorrect? 
Mno
Mjust confused on why they specified it like this
Bi haven't checked the details yet.
Bbut if we actually want to do work on this ticket, i think it should be added to the project plan
MI added it as a karg check in bluefin/aurora. Personally, haven't seen this described issue on my nvidia box that runs luks
Jhey does anyone else find this weird: https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/543
- everyone else seems to be hitting this?
GitHub
Describe the bug Trying to rebase an existing SB39 to SB40 fails to boot showing vmlinuz-6.8.1-300.fc40.x86.x64 has invalid signature. you need to load the kernel first on an Thinkpad T495. I was n...
RColin's message makes it seem all that's needed is bootupd? Which has been in the images for months
travier and I had a chat, a few things here:
We can safely add bootupd to f39
I think we can also document a flow of rpm-ostree upgrade but without restarting, then
Run bootupd from the new root
Jsince september of last year, that's when we added it
Bi have a machine which i could use for testing, but i'm a bit in the weeds on several other issues, so as far as I'm concerned, this needs to get on the backlog, but that doesn't mean we need to action it yet
