Fully agreed, it's just a stubborn lot who refuse to try anything they aren't accustomed too
Fully agreed, it's just a stubborn lot who refuse to try anything they aren't accustomed too
KReddit
Explore this post and more from the linux_gaming community
GPeople need to realise you can have your cake and eat it too with ublue lol. Though I'm inclined to agree with niche traditional distros
VI'm sorry but how do you think Fedora good but Nobara bad 
VNobara isn't created by some unknown guy either
VLiterally employed by the sponsor of fedora
Pit's just a crusty old gatekeeper
GYeah Nobara has a lot of credentials backing it up
Parent the main mint versions on an ancient kernel?
GThey are unless you use the Edge build
VMy issues with Nobara are just:
- Fedora Workstation
- New versions kinda take a while
- Fedora Workstation
- New versions kinda take a while
VBut like
VThat's not "Grrrr it's not made by a big company!"
PI'll bet a dollar the poster is also a wayland-hater who wants x to stay
BSome folks just WANT to be miserable
GI would've likely been either still on Arch or tried out Nobara if it wasn't for ublue, so yeah I'm definitely not opposed to it
Kwhat is wayland and x11, i've heard it thrown around but i don't get it
VOh this is the same guy
Ki've tried looking it up but im too baby
VThat uhhh... That checks out.
GYup lol
GDifferent display servers. Tl;dr is that Wayland is newer and fully supported while X11 is getting depreciated. Wayland is pretty much feature complete outside the flickering NVIDIA bugs
Kdisplay server is?
VCompositors, basically what renders your windows for you.
X11 is 40-ish years old and the codebase is a mess. It's been put into "maintainence" (Basically just gets fixes, no new updates)
This has led people into thinking X11 is way more stable than it really is, because it's codebase has basically been untouched for a decade.
Wayland is the replacement to X11, and is finally in it's primetime after over a decade of development. It's codebase is a lot sleeker, it is a LOT more secure and is what developers are targeting for new features (e.g. HDR).
Wayland is controversial because it still has a few issues and it's more secure approach has some usability trade-offs which are slowly being solved as time goes on, as well as the whole Nvidia issue.
X11 is 40-ish years old and the codebase is a mess. It's been put into "maintainence" (Basically just gets fixes, no new updates)
This has led people into thinking X11 is way more stable than it really is, because it's codebase has basically been untouched for a decade.
Wayland is the replacement to X11, and is finally in it's primetime after over a decade of development. It's codebase is a lot sleeker, it is a LOT more secure and is what developers are targeting for new features (e.g. HDR).
Wayland is controversial because it still has a few issues and it's more secure approach has some usability trade-offs which are slowly being solved as time goes on, as well as the whole Nvidia issue.
Koh i se
Ke
Kso it handles like
Kdisplay?
K
Vlmfao
Kis it just windows or is it all display as a whole
BIt didn't take much scrolling through his reddit post history to see the type of person he/she is
D>nixos
Kalso do you guys know good freeware disk management software for windows
Ksometimes the built in disk management doesn't work and i don't trst these search results
Pmanaging what about them?
Klike
Kreformatting partitions
Ki've used something called easeus before but
Kit's like
K"free trial"
PI always just used the built in tools windows has
VHe's actually a wayland guy apparently
VI kinda find it weird a NixOS user would hate on immutability
VFriendly fire
Voh wait I'm getting people confused
VWe're corporate shills
Kwhat is immutability
VNot being able to make changes to your system files. Many people consider Bazzite/Fedora Atomic "Immutable" because it limits changes that can be made to your system somewhat.
VIt's kind of a difficult thing to properly define
