I'm confused as to what you're talking about regarding 'your options are API or Worker Proxy' - do y

CChaika Your python project would either use the CF API directly, or you use a CF Worker...

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:14 PM

Again, the CF Workers require a build to webassembly - some of the packages I'm using cannot compile to webassembly

Ppippin_mole I'm confused as to what you're talking about regarding 'your options are API or ...

C

Chaika•4/29/24, 2:14 PM

I mean as a way to access Cloudflare KV

C

Chaika•4/29/24, 2:14 PM

you host your python project wherever, and either you call the CF API to use KV, or you call a worker you make to access KV, both have different benefits/downsides

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:15 PM

Am I not able to just use something like cfkv

PyPI

cfkv

A Python wrapper for the Cloudflare KV Store API

C

Chaika•4/29/24, 2:15 PM

That's using the CF API, so you have those downsides as noted above

global rate limit 1200 requests per 5 minutes, shared with your account including dashboard, and all request have to go back to core/no edge caching

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:15 PM

I dont care so much about edge compatibility - it's only ever going to run on a single instance

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:16 PM

The python project is only ever going to run once per 10-15minutes

C

Chaika•4/29/24, 2:16 PM

then sounds like that could work for you

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:16 PM

I dont really see how workers can ever be used for anything more than returning 'hello world'

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:16 PM

Literally every package I've tried to use requires me to 'request availability from cloudflare team'

Ppippin_mole Literally every package I've tried to use requires me to 'request availability f...

C

Chaika•4/29/24, 2:17 PM

talking about python workers? Yea they're still very much in beta, JS workers are recommended and probably will always be the most supported

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:17 PM

Well yeah I tried using Rust workers, which tbh is in even more of a beta

P

pippin_moleOP•4/29/24, 2:18 PM

Both Rust + Python gave me a bad experience

C

Chaika•4/29/24, 2:18 PM

Yea, JS/TS is just best for workers. I mean it all runs on V8 JS Engine - same as Chrome, Both Rust and Python are just running as WASM and binding back to javascript methods/it's all still JS at the start and finish

BBeny It means your script can use 30s of CPU time for each request to the worker, whi...

R

rootalien•4/29/24, 4:33 PM

I have max 10mb files but what is the bad usage?

Original message was deleted

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/29/24, 4:38 PM

?channel-crossposting

F

Flare•4/29/24, 4:38 PM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

Original message was deleted

R

rootalien•4/29/24, 4:38 PM

#stream-and-calls

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/29/24, 4:38 PM

You probably want to move to #stream-and-calls yeah.

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/29/24, 4:38 PM

I'll delete your message here.

E

EvanPiro•4/29/24, 4:39 PM

Is sending multi part form data with files supported in workers? I can't seem to get a trivial example working:

      const fileContent = "This is a simple text file.";
      const file = new File([fileContent], "simple_text_file.txt", {
        type: "text/plain",
      });

      formData.set("file", file);
      formData.append("purpose", "fine-tune")
      const fetchOptions: RequestInit = {
        method: "POST",
        headers: {
          Authorization: `Bearer ${apiKey}`,
        },
        body: formData,
      };

      // Make the POST request to OpenAI
      const response = await fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/files", fetchOptions);

      const fileContent = "This is a simple text file.";
      const file = new File([fileContent], "simple_text_file.txt", {
        type: "text/plain",
      });

      formData.set("file", file);
      formData.append("purpose", "fine-tune")
      const fetchOptions: RequestInit = {
        method: "POST",
        headers: {
          Authorization: `Bearer ${apiKey}`,
        },
        body: formData,
      };

      // Make the POST request to OpenAI
      const response = await fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/files", fetchOptions);

      const fileContent = "This is a simple text file.";
      const file = new File([fileContent], "simple_text_file.txt", {
        type: "text/plain",
      });

      formData.set("file", file);
      formData.append("purpose", "fine-tune")
      const fetchOptions: RequestInit = {
        method: "POST",
        headers: {
          Authorization: `Bearer ${apiKey}`,
        },
        body: formData,
      };

      // Make the POST request to OpenAI
      const response = await fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/files", fetchOptions);

      const fileContent = "This is a simple text file.";
      const file = new File([fileContent], "simple_text_file.txt", {
        type: "text/plain",
      });

      formData.set("file", file);
      formData.append("purpose", "fine-tune")
      const fetchOptions: RequestInit = {
        method: "POST",
        headers: {
          Authorization: `Bearer ${apiKey}`,
        },
        body: formData,
      };

      // Make the POST request to OpenAI
      const response = await fetch("https://api.openai.com/v1/files", fetchOptions);

L

Louis•4/29/24, 4:46 PM

I'm working on a project where I need to upload videos to Cloudflare using JavaScript. I found a code that works fine for normal-sized videos, but I've run into an issue when trying to upload videos larger than 200 MB.

I've tried several solutions, but I haven't yet found an effective way to handle the uploading of large videos. Does anyone have an example or can you guide me on what I might be missing or how I can approach this issue?

ERROR CONNECTION

R

rootalien•4/29/24, 4:53 PM

#r2

A

an•4/29/24, 5:47 PM

Is there any way to measure cpu time? Since Date.now() doesn't work as it mentioned in this wiki https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/performance
My worker is run heavily on cpu with wasm like processing image , measure only database fetches or api fetches is not enough for request tracing, didn't give me enough info to visual the request timeline

Cloudflare Docs

Performance and timers · Cloudflare Workers docs

Measure timing, performance, and timing of subrequests and other operations.

H

hob8yte•4/29/24, 10:50 PM

Anyone know of resources/projects running ffmpeg.wasm on workers? I want to transcribe some pretty short videos (i think under the 10MB limit around workers size) using workers ai and know very little about both ffmpeg and wasm

Rrootalien I have max 10mb files but what is the bad usage?

B

Beny•4/30/24, 12:57 AM

For example loading the entire file into memory just to send it somewhere else, using streams is better for that

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 1:56 AM

I have a worker that I want to call an external api on, but I want to return a response without awaiting the the external api call. (the external api call is to just save time writing to the db on another service).

        const promise = fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        });
        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(promise.then())

        flow.params = { campaignId: campaignId }
        return flow;

        const promise = fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        });
        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(promise.then())

        flow.params = { campaignId: campaignId }
        return flow;

        const promise = fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        });
        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(promise.then())

        flow.params = { campaignId: campaignId }
        return flow;

        const promise = fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        });
        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(promise.then())

        flow.params = { campaignId: campaignId }
        return flow;

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 1:57 AM

however when I am testing it local and it is not hitting the service

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 1:58 AM

I am using hono https://hono.dev/api/context#executionctx

Context - Hono

Ultrafast web framework for Cloudflare Workers, Fastly Compute, Deno, Bun, Vercel, Node.js, and others. Fast, but not only fast.

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 2:00 AM

the worker is on localhost:8787 and the write service for the impression is on localhost:3000 I am able to create the impression successully calling it directly but the waitUntil is not hitting it when calling the localhost:8787 endpoint

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 12:15 PM

If not waitUntil what method would I use? I believe I still have to await a durable object call correct?

I

ItsWendell•4/30/24, 12:20 PM

@tony Since this is quite a general question about waitUntil I think it's actually fine do to this in here. Do you see any other logs in your console? Are both endpoints ran through the workers sdk / wrangler?

Give this a try:

        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        }).catch((e) => console.error("Error doing impressions", e))
);

        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        }).catch((e) => console.error("Error doing impressions", e))
);

        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        }).catch((e) => console.error("Error doing impressions", e))
);

        c.executionCtx.waitUntil(fetch('http://localhost:3000/impression', {
            method: "POST",
            body: JSON.stringify(data),
            headers: {
                "content-type": "application/json",
            }
        }).catch((e) => console.error("Error doing impressions", e))
);

D

Danny Zhao•4/30/24, 12:22 PM

If I have a worker like the official example

export default {
  async fetch(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
    /**
     * Replace `remote` with the host you wish to send requests to
     */
    const remote = "https://example.com";

    return await fetch(remote, request);
  },
};

export default {
  async fetch(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
    /**
     * Replace `remote` with the host you wish to send requests to
     */
    const remote = "https://example.com";

    return await fetch(remote, request);
  },
};

export default {
  async fetch(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
    /**
     * Replace `remote` with the host you wish to send requests to
     */
    const remote = "https://example.com";

    return await fetch(remote, request);
  },
};

export default {
  async fetch(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
    /**
     * Replace `remote` with the host you wish to send requests to
     */
    const remote = "https://example.com";

    return await fetch(remote, request);
  },
};

And the response is about 100MB which takes a user 1 minute to download. How much money may I be charged for each request according to the pricing model?

DDanny Zhao If I have a worker like the official example ```typescript export default { a...

I

ItsWendell•4/30/24, 12:28 PM

You'll be charged for CPU time and amount of requests, not waiting for IO, since this is IO and you're not doing/awaiting for any CPU actions it shouldn't be too much. This will incur probably at most <10ms (probably less) of CPU time per request. I don't think you pay for the data transferred at all, but not 100% sure about that in terms of ingress.

IItsWendell You'll be charged for CPU time and amount of requests, not waiting for IO, since...

D

Danny Zhao•4/30/24, 12:39 PM

Thanks for responding!

I

ItsWendell•4/30/24, 12:47 PM

Also good to monitor this as you go in the dashboard!

IItsWendell @tony Since this is quite a general question about waitUntil I think it's actual...

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 12:55 PM

one is a worker the other is a node docker image. Does waitUntil only work on when calling other workers?

IItsWendell @tony Since this is quite a general question about waitUntil I think it's actual...

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 12:58 PM

The entire function is wrapped in a try catch so any error would be logged and thrown.

T

tonytheonly•4/30/24, 12:59 PM

That being said I get now errors, and when looking at the logs of the localhost:3000 i see no console log of the request. However when I post the same information in postman to localhost:3000 I get a console log

G

George Boot•4/30/24, 1:10 PM

I am getting

Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'writeDataPoint')

Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'writeDataPoint')

Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'writeDataPoint')

Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'writeDataPoint') when trying analytics engine. I've added the binding to my toml and deployed. Is there anything else I need to to to start using analytics engine?

G

George Boot•4/30/24, 1:11 PM

It seems like my analytics_engine_datasets isnt actually bound to the worker. A console.log of the env doesn't show the binding

M

matiasjMusante•4/30/24, 1:15 PM

Does someone know something about function usage on static page rendering in next on pages, as disccused above:

https://community.cloudflare.com/t/loading-static-page-counts-towards-function-request/535651

Is this really like this? Is this situation shared among all other frameworks/ssgenerators? I mean, do they all incur in function usage when rendering static pages? I was reading about Astro, and it seems nice but I dont know if may be it´s the same with all frameworks.

MmatiasjMusante Does someone know something about function usage on static page rendering in nex...

I

Isaac McFadyen•4/30/24, 1:20 PM

?channel-crossposting

I'm confused as to what you're talking about regarding 'your options are API or Worker Proxy' - do y

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads