i just wish gnome would implement the various wayland portals
i just wish gnome would implement the various wayland portals
Aeh, GNOME have their reasons for things
Vit's been a collaboration between kde, system76/cosmic, wlroots, weston, and gamescope/valve all deciding to play ball with each other and decide on universal standards together and gnome mostly not deciding to take part.
AI mean, as it stands GNOME do what GNOME do. I'm not one to ask too many questions because this shit is hard lmao. As long as my stuff works (and it do work)
KJust want HDR and DRM leasing
KAnd Xwayland scaling
KAfter that they can do whatever they want
KI'll be happy
VHDR is still waiting on screen tearing to be implimented first on the Gnome side I beleive
VI like KDE but I'm very much eying Cosmic
KOop add another to the list
AI mean their XWayland Scaling implementation is working so far, it's just gotta be merged into stable which GNOME tends to only do after A LOT of testing
KVgnome has a strong vision and is inflexible about it. you either like their vision or you don't. the nice thing is there's plenty of choice in the sea of linux.
KEven if you don't their extension system is pretty powerful
KHuge fan
AI LOVE their extensions system
Vi much prefer just having everything in settings than needing extensions myself, but each their own
Vit's not a value judgement
AI mean that replies on the thing you want to change being in the settings to begin with
Awhich it may not be
Vi saw that. SO MANY extensions
Aoh the window wobbles don't come through with the default screen capture
Vwhatever works for you 
AModularity is cool
Vcorrect me if i'm wrong, but wasn't there drama with gnome and drm leasing with gnome originally agreeing with valve's spec and then them changing their mind later? they're the only de that doesn't support it
AGitHub
xrandr for Gnome/wayland, on distros that don't support wlr-randr - maxwellainatchi/gnome-randr-rust
Htalking about that, does someone got an ideia of when will wine stop relying on xwayland? that might cause problems when fedora drops x11, right?
Abecause I don't think it's actually all that relevant atm?
Ait won't cause issues
Axwayland won't get poofed
Ait's independent of X11 itself afaik
Abut Wine is working on Wayland functionality in 9.0
Hyeah, but won't there be any performance losses?
AI wouldn't think so?
Hxwayland = x11 application compatibility support for wayland (think of it as a very slimmed down X11 server made from scratch)
Abut yeah @Kyle Gospo I was thinking if that github package I linked above might be related to those weird xwayland fractional scaling issues I was having (and maybe the ones you're having too?)
Vx11 app support isn't being dropped, just x11 os support
Vxwayland runs x11 apps
Mthe summary is pretty good for the gnome-randr-rust. Its like xrandr but insted for gnome-wayland.
wlr-randr is wl-roots randr. which doesn't work on gnome.
wlr-randr is wl-roots randr. which doesn't work on gnome.
HI'm asking because I saw some people saying that performance on xwayland is worse
Amm, just aware of how it might interact with xwayland patches or something (and also because it hasn't had a new stable in two years)
Abecause in stock fedora the patches work right and my cursor doesn't go all weird when moving between wayland and xwayland applications
Ain Bazzite the patch seems to go all loopy and my cursor shrinks when I move it into an XWayland application and grows back to normal when I move it out
K@Kyle Gospo I think I messed up 
Should I ignore this? :/
I was promted to type in my passwd for SSH ...
Should I ignore this? :/
I was promted to type in my passwd for SSH ...
AI'm still trying to figure out exactly WHY the patch does that in bazzite but not standard Fedora 40
Abecause it'd driving me a tad loopy lmao
Ait's the last thing I need to get going really
MHit return. It's a sudo prompt via askpass
Kthanks :