or https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-script-upload-worker-module

Rrob or https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-script-uplo...

B

Beny•5/10/24, 8:51 AM

The first API link you sent is for updating the code only
The second is the one you should use for the initial deployment and if you are changing any bindings

R

robOP•5/10/24, 1:22 PM

ah i see.. and whats platform_module then ?

KKai If i create a user script and delete it after 5 minutes does that incur the full...

R

robOP•5/11/24, 5:07 AM

We ever get an answer for this?

Rrob ah i see.. and whats platform_module then ?

B

Beny•5/11/24, 7:50 PM

That's the name of the file for the example, such as index.js, but theirs is platform_module.mjs

B

Beny•5/11/24, 7:56 PM

It lets a user script import another file uploaded by the platform instead of the user

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

import { platformThing } from "./platform_module.mjs";

R

robOP•5/11/24, 8:13 PM

ohh ok,. got it situated. thank you

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:17 PM

As in the shape of the object for the bindings property in your metadata JSON?

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:20 PM

[[dispatch_namespaces]]

[[dispatch_namespaces]]

in TOML maps to an array of these objects in JSON:

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

{
  type: "dispatch_namespace";
  name: string;
  namespace: string;
  outbound?: {
    worker: {
      service: string;
      environment?: string;
    };
    params?: { name: string }[];
  };
};

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:20 PM

Creating a dispatch namespace is https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-create

Kkian `[[dispatch_namespaces]]` in TOML maps to an array of these objects in JSON: ``...

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:32 PM

A Dynamic Dispatch Worker is just a Worker with one of these bindings

K

kian•5/15/24, 3:32 PM

in the bindings property of the metadata when you're doing the upload, i.e https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-for-platforms/workers-for-platforms/reference/metadata/

V

vmg•5/16/24, 3:23 PM

I'm trying to work with local development mode and get the following error:

[wrangler:err] SyntaxError: "undefined" is not valid JSON

[wrangler:err] SyntaxError: "undefined" is not valid JSON

I think it might be missing this bug fix?

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/5658

GitHub

🐛 BUG: requests from workers to DOs (in miniflare) broken in wrangl...

Which Cloudflare product(s) does this pertain to? Wrangler core, Miniflare What version(s) of the tool(s) are you using? 3.51.2 [wrangler] What version of Node are you using? v18.19.0 What operatin...

R

robOP•5/20/24, 4:18 PM

on WfP can you use native RPC to talk to other workers on the same namespace? do they have to be service bindings/workers? Just trying to clarify that aspect

Rrob on WfP can you use native RPC to talk to other workers on the same namespace? ...

B

Beny•5/20/24, 8:58 PM

Yeah RPC works to the workers in the namespace

R

robOP•5/20/24, 8:58 PM

ty

R

robOP•5/21/24, 4:37 AM

also is it best practises to do 1 R2 bucker per customer? I Assume yes

Rrob also is it best practises to do 1 R2 bucker per customer? I Assume yes

S

Sam•5/21/24, 7:06 AM

Only if you have less than 1000 customers.
Take a look at https://developers.cloudflare.com/r2/reference/limits/

R

robOP•5/21/24, 10:45 AM

Interesting , I'm sure they mentioned here they could raise limits

R

robOP•5/21/24, 10:45 AM

I'm just trying to follow best flow

Rrob Interesting , I'm sure they mentioned here they could raise limits

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 10:47 AM

They should be able to

Rrob I'm just trying to follow best flow

B

Beny•5/21/24, 3:40 PM

I think they'd prefer you used 1 bucket and give each customer a folder, but there are no technical limitations if you wanted 1 per customer.
See Sid's post here: r2

R

robOP•5/21/24, 3:40 PM

Yeah I don't mind doing one drive and partitioning g with "folder" prefixes per customer either

R

robOP•5/21/24, 3:40 PM

Yeah looking for confirm on which makes more sense .

R

robOP•5/21/24, 8:07 PM

My next question is, I see serving static from workers is discontinued? So if my users wanted to deploy frontend static htmk or something what would i do?

Rrob My next question is, I see serving static from workers is discontinued? So if m...

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 8:30 PM

Did Sites ever work with Workers for Platforms? The big thing with Sites was just that it had a package/upload tool(Wrangler) that was supported by the team. Everything it can do, you can build yourself

R

robOP•5/21/24, 8:44 PM

yeah it esbuild or something bundles ur frontend into like static assets? thne id do a dist or static folder and like app.servestatic on hono or something, but i saw in thier docs they said it's been dscontinued

R

robOP•5/21/24, 8:45 PM

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

WARNING

This "Serve static files" feature for Cloudflare Workers has been deprecated. If you want to create an application that serves static assets files, use Cloudflare Pages instead of Cloudflare Workers.

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 8:45 PM

Sites was deprecated many years ago

R

robOP•5/21/24, 9:28 PM

yah not sites I was talking about serve static files aspect

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 9:34 PM

That's Sites :p

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 9:35 PM

Pages is the recommended way for now

With convergence static assets will come to Workers officially (Sites was always quite a hack) but that's still a way off

R

robOP•5/21/24, 9:39 PM

welp. lol . alright so for WFp if someone wants to deploy static frontend jsut use pages API or something liek that? it won't be able to be served from the same worker ?

WWalshy Pages is the recommended way for now With convergence static assets will come t...

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 10:45 PM

Is there a Pages For Platforms that you can call via a Dispatcher?

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/21/24, 10:45 PM

Or something similar

W

Walshy•5/21/24, 10:47 PM

no, you can spin up a site though and invoke it (we have customers doing similar just not through wfp)

Ttanushree │ Workers PM Second argument hasn't been implemented (publicly) yet. It's a way to pass bindi...

A

avogadro•5/22/24, 1:04 PM

I want to pass some custom args to the user worker without modifying the original request. Is this not possible right now? could be a good use case of the second parameter in dispatcher.get(..).

W

Walshy•5/22/24, 1:05 PM

jsrpc

W

Walshy•5/22/24, 1:05 PM

You could implement your own fetch handler and pass in whatever you want

W

Walshy•5/22/24, 1:06 PM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/rpc

Cloudflare Docs

Remote-procedure call (RPC) · Cloudflare Workers docs

The built-in, JavaScript-native RPC system built into Workers and Durable Objects.

A

avogadro•5/22/24, 1:09 PM

Gotcha, I guess I can do that. Would the

cf

cf

object still be stripped when passing the

Request

Request

through?

E

ehrenmann•5/22/24, 7:37 PM

hi guys, im new to all this so this may be a stupid question.
I want to make a worker that gets visitors data from headers (useragent...) and want to save this somewhere. i saw that there is hyperdrive and as far as i understand it, i can connect my db. are there any limits for reading/writing and also for this kind of worker should i get worker for platforms? are there any benefits?
thanks

A

Abdallah Abis•5/22/24, 9:58 PM

Hey Folks,
In docs here https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-for-platforms/workers-for-platforms/get-started/dynamic-dispatch/
I see that

await userWorker.fetch(request)

await userWorker.fetch(request)

will throw an error with message that starts with

Worker not found

Worker not found

if the worker is not found.
What if I'm using this with RPC, when the worker is not found I get

internal error.

internal error.

and not

Worker not found

Worker not found

how can I configure this, or how would I know that if the worker threw exception or not found

Cloudflare Docs

Create a dynamic dispatch Worker · Cloudflare for Platforms docs

After you have created a dispatch namespace, you can fetch any user Workers in the namespace using a dynamic dispatch Worker. The dynamic dispatch …

Eehrenmann hi guys, im new to all this so this may be a stupid question. I want to make a ...

O

Owl Reddy•5/25/24, 2:07 AM

I'm the newest one here but I guess you can use cloudflare analytics for that kind of data as it's easy to do time series queries with that besides normal queries. Hyperdrive needs Postgres which you gotta deploy urself or use hosted services and it's maily for read heavy workloads.

A

Abdallah Abis•5/28/24, 11:12 AM

Hey folks,
Doing a

PUT

PUT

request to

/secrets

/secrets

returns this:

{
    "result": {
        "name": "TEST",
        "type": "secret_text"
    },
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": {
        "name": "TEST",
        "type": "secret_text"
    },
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": {
        "name": "TEST",
        "type": "secret_text"
    },
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": {
        "name": "TEST",
        "type": "secret_text"
    },
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

But doing a

GET

GET

just after that to the same endpoint returns this:

{
    "result": [],
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": [],
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": [],
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

{
    "result": [],
    "success": true,
    "errors": [],
    "messages": []
}

Any idea why secrets aren't being set?

AAbdallah Abis Hey folks, Doing a `PUT` request to `/secrets` returns this: ```JSON { "resu...

A

Abdallah Abis•5/28/24, 4:50 PM

I found the issue, but have no idea how to fix it.
So assuming

x-script-name

x-script-name

is deployed to both

namespace-dev

namespace-dev

and

namespace-prod

namespace-prod

(namespace-dev first)

If I do a

PUT

PUT

to

/workers/dispatch/namespaces/namespace-prod/scripts/x-script-name/secrets

/workers/dispatch/namespaces/namespace-prod/scripts/x-script-name/secrets

The API hits

/namespaces/namespace-dev/scripts

/namespaces/namespace-dev/scripts

and not

namespace-prod

namespace-prod

for some reason.

I think it hits the namespace that it was deployed to first.

I did rename the worker and deploy it to

namespace-prod

namespace-prod

first and add a secret to it and it worked, but deploying the same renamed worker to

namespace-dev

namespace-dev

and trying to add a secret to the last deployed worker it actually ended up added to the

namespace-prod

namespace-prod

one.
In other words, the dispatch namespace in this API has no effect it just looks in all the user workers on the account and picks the first one deployed and not the one in that particular workspace.

A

avogadro•5/28/24, 8:15 PM

I am calling

return await userWorker.handleRequest(request)

return await userWorker.handleRequest(request)

. When i look in the logs, I see that it says "outcome": "cancelled". Any ideas?
the handleRequest implementation is just

return new Response('Hello World!');

return new Response('Hello World!');

or https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/namespace-worker-script-upload-worker-module

Similar Threads