waldo vision apparently will be able to detect its you even if youre on a different computer
waldo vision apparently will be able to detect its you even if youre on a different computer
Tidk a goddamn thing about it thats just a single sentence i read on reddit from over a year ago
ABattlefield 1 is just FairFight
Hthe what now
Aand it apparently uses Qt for the interface what the fu
Tai anti cheat in development
T
KWeirdddd
Premember how i said it was all just a big marketing grift!
CI remember watching a GDC talk about VAC one time and being really impressed, and then the reality of matters hit
HI THOUGHT YOU WERE JOKING??
LIt sure ain't "cooperative"
H
Pyou put more money into anticheat itself you just create more cheaters
ABFV also used FairFight until the EA anticheat thing
Pthe article i linked isn't for anticheat though it's a general networking solution
Pyou can apply this to any video game without having to shaft your customers
Pand the benefit is wallhacks just got 10x worse
Pthey are now awful to use and hard to justify the effort
Pso less people will go through the effort of doing so overall
ABattlefield 4 also uses Qt for the interface
Tinteresting take
Pthat tracks tbh
Aso it must just be something with the modern Battlefields
PQt is everywhere if you look close
Ti both like and dislike the idea of sharing proof youre you
Hpaywalling sounds great until you realize that a lot of games are paywalled anyway lol
Talso the part where not everyone has that kind of money in the first place
Pi know a guy who easily made five figures repackaging a basic exploit and selling it for a one-time purchase of $30 to script kiddies
Pthe money is insane
Tive never paid for a hack and i do not understand doing so if there are free ones that do what you need anyways
CAll in all, the main advantage of cheaters isn't that they have physical or kernel access, but the fact that they're not the developer - so they can think of things the developer couldn't and have never conceived.
In that sense, I think it should be seen as regular software security, something like CVEs, big bug bounties and things like that
In that sense, I think it should be seen as regular software security, something like CVEs, big bug bounties and things like that
Trunescape has manual live reviews
Pfree ones are just there to give you a taste for it, get you banned, and make you come back with better paid shit out of spite
CCurrent bug bounties as far as I'm aware are for malicious exploits of the system, not cheating in the game itself
H^^
Pthere is a whole market designed around this lol
Tyes involve the community more
Pand these companies in china making the cheats
Pthey aren't losing money when they get patched from one game, they're often repackaging the same shit for ten games at a time
Ptheir programmers aren't stupid
Pthey get paid just as well as anticheat developers
Pprobably more
Ti remember watching a video from piratesoftware explaining how he would figure out ways to stop cheaters
Panticheat doesn't have a lot of foot traffic compared to cheating
SHas the vrr been fixed yet on the ally?
Hjagex experimented with "ai" banning many years ago, there was a long period where pmods were not even allowed to mute spam bots and just let them reign free, it sucked
CHahahahaha, I just remembered - League of Legends had this community tribunal system where you got rewarded for punishing people. Not ruling correctly, specifically ruling guilty
Ti hate how spam bots are still there
Tyea and thats a good concept that can be improved upon a lot
