Cloudflare Developers•2y ago

Ah okay! Thanks. Still getting used to using SQLite.

MMatt Ah okay! Thanks. Still getting used to using SQLite.

SteffTek•6/21/24, 9:15 PM

SQLite on the edge was one of the dumbest, but best things to happen to the CF ecosystem

SSoftbear Hello has anyone tested the d1 driver for datagrip ? I can't manage to make pa...

vrballer•6/23/24, 12:27 AM

were you able to get this working (or possibly find some working alternative)

Gerbuuun•6/23/24, 6:43 PM

How would one access a DB specific to a user with the same pages project? Isn't there a limit on bindings per worker/pages project? I've read the messages around this: d1-database (or this d1-database ) Is this multi-tenancy support already available? I can't find anything about it in the documentation

GGerbuuun How would one access a DB specific to a user with the same pages project? Isn't ...

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/23/24, 6:44 PM

:soontm:

Gerbuuun•6/23/24, 6:44 PM

Ah the classic.. Looking forward to it!

Disciple of Caoximeihao•6/24/24, 8:40 AM

hello

Disciple of Caoximeihao•6/24/24, 8:40 AM

i from hono and D1

Disciple of Caoximeihao•6/24/24, 8:41 AM

const insertedOptionValues = await c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues (optionId, valueName) VALUES (?, ?), (?, ?), (? ,? )`)
      .bind(optionId, valueName[0], optionId, valueName[1], optionId, valueName[2])
      .run();

const insertedOptionValues = await c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues (optionId, valueName) VALUES (?, ?), (?, ?), (? ,? )`)
      .bind(optionId, valueName[0], optionId, valueName[1], optionId, valueName[2])
      .run();

Disciple of Caoximeihao•6/24/24, 8:41 AM

how to insert multi in d1

DDisciple of Caoximeihao ```const insertedOptionValues = await c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues...

Hard@Work•6/24/24, 8:50 AM

I would probably do

const ps = c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues (optionId, valueName) VALUES (?, ?)`);
const queries = [];
for(const row of rows) {
  queries.push(ps.bind(...row));
}
await c.env.DB.batch(queries);

const ps = c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues (optionId, valueName) VALUES (?, ?)`);
const queries = [];
for(const row of rows) {
  queries.push(ps.bind(...row));
}
await c.env.DB.batch(queries);

HHard@Work I would probably do ```js const ps = c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues ...

Disciple of Caoximeihao•6/24/24, 9:05 AM

working, but sql create 3 query, how to 1 query done

DDisciple of Caoximeihao working, but sql create 3 query, how to 1 query done

Hard@Work•6/24/24, 9:05 AM

I'm not sure I understand the question?

HHello, I’m Allie!:soontm:

Miloš•6/24/24, 5:10 PM

next to Dynamic Bindings, are there plans for sharding as well perhaps?

Miloš•6/24/24, 5:15 PM

Asking because my app requires a lot of queries across users which I believe wouldn't be that easy with per user db setup

DDisciple of Caoximeihao ```const insertedOptionValues = await c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues...

Vinodh•6/25/24, 4:55 AM

Use Drizzle ORM -> https://orm.drizzle.team/docs/insert#insert-multiple-rows

MMiloš next to Dynamic Bindings, are there plans for sharding as well perhaps?

Hard@Work•6/25/24, 10:53 AM

That one I'm not sure about, might be good to ask for an update in #community-call-questions if there isn't one already

Pavlo•6/25/24, 10:56 AM

Hello, what does this error mean and how to solve it? D1_ERROR: D1 exceeded its CPU time limit and was reset

PPavlo Hello, what does this error mean and how to solve it? D1_ERROR: D1 exceeded its ...

SteffTek•6/25/24, 11:39 AM

your D1 Query was so big, that your worker shut itself off

SteffTek•6/25/24, 11:40 AM

you have limited time to answer a worker request

Vvrballer were you able to get this working (or possibly find some working alternative)

Softbear•6/25/24, 2:49 PM

I'm using TablePlus

dqwqwdldowqqw•6/25/24, 4:42 PM

@Hard@Work

dqwqwdldowqqw•6/25/24, 4:42 PM

Can you help sorry for ping

dqwqwdldowqqw•6/25/24, 4:42 PM

Check #general-help latest.

Ddqwqwdldowqqw Check #general-help latest.

Hard@Work•6/25/24, 4:46 PM

?pings

Flare•6/25/24, 4:46 PM

Please do not ping community members for non-moderation reasons. Doing so will not solve your issue faster and will make people less likely to want to help you.

Hard@Work•6/25/24, 4:46 PM

Also, not sure what this has to do with D1

SteffTek•6/25/24, 5:14 PM

i've got this error multiple times while migrating my database. someone knows why this keeps showing up? i always killed the last migration but this time i have follow migrations and it's not that easy

SteffTek•6/25/24, 5:31 PM

i removed so many comments after finding a github issue, this is dumb lol

EEisenbergEffect Looking at limits to D1, I see that a single DB is limted to 10GB and that an ac...

Sam•6/25/24, 5:52 PM

The 10gb per database not, but I think the account limit can be increased by contacting support

Ppeshakoo I wonder how many users I can fit into 10GB without sharding

SteffTek•6/25/24, 5:59 PM

SSoftbear I'm using TablePlus

vrballer•6/25/24, 10:23 PM

Thanks!

puerh•6/26/24, 12:24 PM

Is there any way to restrict people from just using the UI to add a record to a d1 database directly (or even KV) - but still giving them worker write access? Feels like a really annoying permissions gap if not

I just want a db that we can only add to through known sources rather than anyone with enough permissions in cloudflare

Original message was deleted

puerh•6/26/24, 6:51 PM

I think that's what I'm trying to work out

Ideally the only way to deploy something that touches the DB will be through Github and atleast then it's reviewed.
But atm it feels a little impossible to store anything that's even remotely sensitive as it's a complete wild west. But I don't think Cloudflare offers the sort of permissions model I'm after.

I'm a Cloudflare admin, and I don't really want the permission to add records to the database directly through the UI

Unsmart•6/26/24, 6:58 PM

I mean realistically no platform offers that kind of permission model. But for all platforms you basically need to do the permission side of stuff in github actions where the github action can deploy the worker and not the user

Unsmart•6/26/24, 6:59 PM

I dont think cloudflare offers a read only view of workers resources though unless I am just missing it so they wont be able to use UI to view any D1/KV/etc stuff

rampatra•6/26/24, 8:16 PM

Can someone help me with this issue - https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-docs/issues/15343 ?

GitHub

Need instructions for existing workers · Issue #15343 · cloudflare/...

Existing documentation URL(s) Doc link - https://developers.cloudflare.com/d1/get-started/ This page lists nicely the steps when creating a worker from scratch but what if someone already has a wor...

rampatra•6/26/24, 8:18 PM

I am trying to follow the instructions and set up this DB environment variable in my nextjs app but I am stuck at the very first step.

rampatra•6/26/24, 8:25 PM

I think the doc is outdated. Let me try something.

surgery18•6/27/24, 12:18 AM

Hey, my project I am working on (uses pages, a few workers, R2, durable objects, and queue) currently uses Mongodb. I was thinking of converting my DB and my entire code base to use D1 instead. Before I do that, I want to know a couple of things.

1) Can D1 be used for a commerical project? Or is it more for hobby/personal projects? I am thinking for amount of requests hitting the db and what it can handle.
2) I think this is the big one, would I notice a big difference in speed from mongo to D1. If I convert to D1 then the whole architecture would be on Cloudflare and in my mind that means it would be quicker.

Thanks

Disciple of Caoximeihao•6/28/24, 9:55 AM


      SELECT DISTINCT *
      FROM variantValues vv
      JOIN options o ON o.optionId = vv.optionId
      JOIN optionValues ov ON ov.valueId = vv.valueId
      WHERE vv.variantId IN '(7, 8, 9, 10)'


      SELECT DISTINCT *
      FROM variantValues vv
      JOIN options o ON o.optionId = vv.optionId
      JOIN optionValues ov ON ov.valueId = vv.valueId
      WHERE vv.variantId IN '(7, 8, 9, 10)'

hello, how to not working?

Disciple of Caoximeihao•6/28/24, 9:55 AM

help

Muudka•6/28/24, 11:00 AM

Hello,

We have a SaaS application that utilizes a shared codebase. When onboarding a new user, we create a dedicated database for them, apply migration schemas, load default data, and insert the user's details into a metadata database. This metadata is then linked to the user.

We have a centralized logging system that directs users to the appropriate database by retrieving their connection details from the metadata database and passing them to Prisma. We are currently using PostgreSQL with Prisma.

We would like to know if this behavior can be replicated using workers. Specifically, do the worker and D1 need to be bound simultaneously? At present, we have over 1,000 users, and this system is functioning well for us. The application is not very complex, so migrating from PostgreSQL to SQLite would not be an issue.

Additionally, can the worker accept connections to a D1 database that it is not bound to?

const insertedOptionValues = await c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues (optionId, valueName) VALUES (?, ?), (?, ?), (? ,? )`) .bind(optionId, valueName[0], optionId, valueName[1], optionId, valueName[2]) .run();

const ps = c.env.DB.prepare(`INSERT INTO optionValues (optionId, valueName) VALUES (?, ?)`); const queries = []; for(const row of rows) { queries.push(ps.bind(...row)); } await c.env.DB.batch(queries);

SELECT DISTINCT * FROM variantValues vv JOIN options o ON o.optionId = vv.optionId JOIN optionValues ov ON ov.valueId = vv.valueId WHERE vv.variantId IN '(7, 8, 9, 10)'

Ah okay! Thanks. Still getting used to using SQLite.

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads