so if i visiting xy.com and they trigger a cloudfalre challenge before showing me the data privacy rules and allow me to opt out they are violating the GDPR
the hoster of the website is allwoed to store the ip adress if: - the owner of the site has a "avv" (dont find the english term, data protection agreement)
but most privacy statements include a condition to allow free use of the ip adress. BUT if i want to do this i have to show the privacy statement BEFORE i collect the data. Same with 3-Party calls like challenges.cloudflare.com
Yeah, I'm just wondering how that works for a firewall for example. If I am not allowed to use your IP address(blocking via Firewall) before showing you a Privacy Statement, then all anyone would need to take down my website would be to DDoS my Privacy Statement
as far as i understand that is no problem because the processing of the ip trough the firewall is technicaly neccessary. If you use a blacklist on your firewall the content of the blacklist is not affected by the dpr because it is technically neccessary to save this ip adresses for a longer time. the ip adress of the visitor has to be deleted after a given limit (7 days i think, maybe 30) if there is no problem with it. (it is allowed to keep the address longer if the visitor seems to "attack" the page)
So if I were to build a service that used IP, along with other signals from the browser, to prevent more sophisticated kinds of attacks before showing the user a privacy agreement, would that be ok, assuming that the privacy agreement would be available after they pass those checks?
it is not only the availability of the privacy agreement to the visitor. if i am not asking the visitor for consent before transfering the data certain things must apply. if the 3party is outside the EU and not in a special "framework" (like the us privacy framework) it is not possible to transfer the data withouth the active and informed consent of the visitor. if the 3party is in such a framework (like cloudflare is in the us pricacy framework) the owner of the site has to sign a data processing agreement with the 3party. He also has to ensure and monitor if the 3party is following the "technical measures" to ensure the protetion of the data by the law. This is not possible for 90% of the website owners
at leo: cloudflare is allowed to process my data if i give a informed consent. opening xy.tld and beeing "redirected" to challenges.cloudflare.com i am not able to give (or deny) my consent. this could be legal if the owner of the site has an agreement with cloudflare and is monitoring the quality of the data protection at cloudflare. in my situation i am not able to rely on these agreements but have to block all 3d-party calls withouth consent (with the consent beeing managed by us).
i am running out of time, i ask the law-guys next week. i am not a lawyer myself so the preceding statements are my personal interpration thank you guys for your time.
Hi guys, I hope someone will answer this stupid question maybe :D. I use cloudflare for dns management for my domain. Everything works well except that I am not able to create a www redirect. Anything I tried will just not work when I do www.domain.com on my browser or anywhere else. Could some advise me what to do? I already tried to search the interent for my problem but without any luck.