Ythey are for me
Pthen you're doing it wrong anyway
KWinetricks
Pand you need to get windows install media and manually rip the font files
KOr Protontricks
Pif you don't do it this way you get 2003 fonts that look like shit
Yits for third party software, plz if you dont know a solution, dont think ppl can just adapt to your way of doing things
Ythx
KThere's no RPM for the core fonts anymore
P^
Yis there a way I can install them?
KOnly with winetricks or Protontricks
KWe ship both
KIf you need them system wide for Linux applications, the answer is no
Pno
KYou would have to manually extract those fonts and manually install them
Pif you want them for linux applications you need to do what i said
Potherwise they won't be correct anyway
YI see
Pthe fonts you are asking for are from 2003 and not built to render on modern displays
Pthey are 100% guaranteed to look like shit and there are FOSS replacements with modern styling
Yyou dont understand, I cant use other fonts, but thx anyway, I'll find a way
Ygood night
Pbro you don't know if he needs them for work or something, settle down
Peven work won't find this helpful
P"thank you for the document with broken fonts on anything above a 1024x768 monitor" - work
KYou can always use replacement fonts
PI'm sure no one finds you helpful honestly
Pi don't care
Pi don't act for you
Ygeez, friendly community you guys got here
Jhey
Jwhat's going on
YI was asking for help installing legacy fonts
Yms core fonts
Pi don't think i have to put sprinkles on every response when i'm talking about something like microsoft fonts
Pit's a very impersonal subject
KPez was very direct, but their answer is accurate. There is no RPM for you to install to use those fonts in Linux I'm afraid
Ywell, np
Ythx for the awnser
KFor wine you have our various tools, and I'm afraid that's really it
Peven the RPM you have is ineffectual
Pwe have 20 years of progress under our belt and that's one of the things that got blown away
P(was in a game round)
I don't disagree - not saying you do. But 2 requests came in, and the answer wasn't "not sprinkled" instead were just more on the side of "no you're wrong"
but like, sometimes people may have specific requirements you may not meet/understand
I don't disagree - not saying you do. But 2 requests came in, and the answer wasn't "not sprinkled" instead were just more on the side of "no you're wrong"
but like, sometimes people may have specific requirements you may not meet/understand
Pand then they have to accept no for an answer
Pbut - w/e just imo tho
Pthat's not a me problem
P¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Pdepends if you're here to be a helping member of the community or to be condescending to prove a point?
