i want a linux os that uses .wads as installation files and whatnot
i want a linux os that uses .wads as installation files and whatnot
Ai just learned this recently because devcontainer
Aand my short term memory sucks
Asame
P.ogg is better
KDoomOS
ZPacman is a nice package manager too
KTo be fair half of these apply to Arch
Ainstalling a package sounds like dialup
Aplays the ogg
PMy problem with arch was the fact that it did NO hand holding at all
And it was my first distro so you can tell how bad it went
And it was my first distro so you can tell how bad it went
Aendeavour was quite a good onboarding experience
Aidk why arch wiki is like mdn lol, they document shit not even in their ecosystem
Pyeah my next hop was endeavour
KLmao yeah
Ayeah i didn't actually try true arch until way later
Ai started with majaro and moved to endeavour
ZGrateful for that tho
PmanjarNO
Aafter trying and hating ubuntu and later pop_os because ubuntu things
Alinus started in manjaro and somehow uninstalled his DE in less than few hour iirc lol
Ai mean
Alinus doesn't pay attention to what he's doing half the time
PNvidia support in linux is &$@! so
Abut also ive done that before; updating mesa and arch wwas like "yeah sure lemme just uninstall everything that depends on mesa and then remove mesa, and then install mesa again"
ZThat's only for consumer stuff
Aof course, it warns you about it first.. or more like, tells you exactly what its going to do
KPopOS
KIt was PopOS
Aoh i think i got it swapped, luke is the one with manjaro?
ZPretty sure they are pushing more for computational power stuff rather than being used for the desktop environment
KI think so
Pactually imagine if there was a wrapper for Linux package managers that played the binary as a sound and video file
like those "install MSDOS on your brain" videos
time to get to work
like those "install MSDOS on your brain" videos
time to get to work
Ahell yeah
Kaplay
Aenterprise tax is more $$$
Anvidia dropped their entire consumer division like
Aa couple years ago
Athe only thing they even remotely care about is the datacenter
Pwell look at them now
Awhy sell 4090 for $2000 when you can create a server rack for $200000
Pthey're in top 3
Aamd isn't looking much better lately, and intel's gpu division is actually kinda promising looking
ZThis means eventually ppl will swap to AMD. If Nvidia doesn't pull another frame generation thingy again
Amakes the most money but alienates their most numerous customer base
Anot that they care
Abut im still salty about it
PARC gpus are too gimmicky
Ais like those live service game, 99% of their customer are alienated, but only 1% pay for 99% of the bill anyway
Athey have very promising hardware (and prices), but yes, for the moment they're not great for consumers