NRight, but you brought up hosting ISOs and we decided not to support hosting main images right?
Jno
Awe're gonna be the first Cosmic ISO
Abruh, beat popos to it
JI was asking if someone was going to do cosmic ISOs
Ayou gotta do isos
RWe have the action to do so, right? Haven’t tested it out personally
GYeah, saw you put it in the queue
RYep 
Jlike, who is going to implement them and pay for them, like is someone going to help in and help ryan I guess is my question
RIt failed all builds the first time though, so keep an eye out for any issues
Aisnt it like 2 bucks per month or sth?
Ahell id pay 2 bucks for that headline
NI'm happy to help folks get ISOs up and going. My question is: is cosmic more of a main image or is it a downstream image like Bluefin or Bazzite?
GAre the builds succeeding now?
JI think we're conflating making builds
RIMO it's a main image people should extend, like Sway and Budgie.
Therefore I think we should be careful about making ISOs. We make ISOs, we will need to build Nvidia. We build Nvidia, people ask for ZFS etc
Therefore I think we should be careful about making ISOs. We make ISOs, we will need to build Nvidia. We build Nvidia, people ask for ZFS etc
Jand what people expect as a product
Jthough I guess it doesn't matter, when it becomes a fedora spin it'll just ingest into main anyway
GI'm all for a bluefin-esque cosmic image but idk about directly in the cosmic repo
Ai think its both
Aespecially if you do day 1
RFrom there we could consider making a customized cosmic experience i.e. a downstream image. I think there’s a lot of potential there
NThat's what I'm trying to get to the nuts and bolts of. We don't make ISOs for main images currently, I don't want to set a precedent that we will do it for other images.
Athink about it its gonna be the first Cosmic ISO
Afirst cosmic ISO like come on
NAlso this.
RI’m pretty sure serpentos or someone else might have cosmic isos already
RDon’t quote me on that though
Aif you'd like to not commit to it you can always say its an Alpha image
NPopOS would be that wouldn't it?
Jyeah but that's easy, it's the implications of giving people a product that I'm concerned about
Alink me the ISO
JI mean we could have made ISOs months ago if we wanted to lol
NRight.
GPop!OS gets the ISO on august 8th
RWe have ISOs right now. Just not being published anywhere. And no idea if they work
https://github.com/ublue-os/cosmic/actions/runs/9964950367
https://github.com/ublue-os/cosmic/actions/runs/9964950367
NImages vs Experiences as a wise man once said in a presentation 
Ayeah same day thats not bad
ROnce cosmic is upstreamed a bluefin-esque image would be really cool
JRight but also explicit "we are not bitnami" in the governance, that's there for a reason.
RDunno it still says queued to merge 
Ai fixed a small /usr/etc to /etc issue with rechunk today
Ayou might want to bump to it, may cause some other issues. I tested a bazzite deck image and it worked
Athe /etc/containers/policy file was not being overwritten before
NRight, I literally don't care if someone wants to host ISOs of any of the main images, I'm just bringing up what we have discussed and decided on in the past.
GI'll bump after the merge
Agreat
Abut I think making an exception for cosmic ISOs and saying people can rebase to say KDE might get some eyeballs
