which did not conflict, but adding to /usr/etc is undefined behavior according to Colins
which did not conflict, but adding to /usr/etc is undefined behavior according to Colins
Kso now our signing rpm fails to install w/ that error
RAnd (knowing nothing about RPMs) we can't add a PREINSTALL step to the signing RPM which deletes the original file if present?
Kyes that would work
Kas would the force replace param
Aaccording to me, i dont think colin ever considered it
Atbh
Arpm-ostree just mashes the directories together
Kwhar that's not what you said, well regardless we are here
RI think 1 and 2 aren't a great option. 1 due to the unnecessary duplication and 2 due to needing to keep a core dependency up-to-date
As for the force replace param, that's a parameter needing to be defined at RPM install time?
As for the force replace param, that's a parameter needing to be defined at RPM install time?
Athe code path mashes the directories together
Kyou got it
RI hate to say it... But I like my idea 
Kyeah, let me try it then
Ai dont think colin has realized you have been putting files in both /etc and /usr/etc yet
Aor thought people would do that
Ayou can see it here though in the docs
Abut why does this conflict though? Shouldnt the file in /etc get replaced?
ROh, that's not really what I meant, but it works.
I thought there could be a way to bundle that instruction as part of the RPM
I thought there could be a way to bundle that instruction as part of the RPM
Knot if another package owns it
Ksadly no
Aisnt /etc an exception?
Knope
Ai know rpm-ostree hates it for every file
Awe have another issue with that because wine-core causes the same issue
K
K
Kand removing doesn't fix it
Kcool
Awhy is the file provided as a package though?
Kso, force allow replace
Kreplace in-image and not via rpm
Kor uhh
Kpackage containers-common w/ our changes
Ayou also have 2 yafti configs
Aif i recall the errors i got
RWe could keep providing the container policy in /usr (maybe not /usr/etc) and symlink it, rather than removing the file?
But I also don't mind the force replace option
But I also don't mind the force replace option
FAre there more details about "copying to /usr/etc/" is undefined behavior>
In my image, I fail to copy file to
Error is
In my image, I fail to copy file to
/etc/hosts but copying to /usr/etc/hosts worksError is
Read-only filesystem
KI'll let @antheas explain
Awhere? in the container?
Fyes
Ais etc read only?
Fno, as other files are copied successfully
Auh maybe ill have to redo the warning
Alet me pull bluefin
Kgot a link to this copy?
Kseems odd
Ai put it on the releases as a warning
Aof rechunk
