thanks, It doesn't require serialized data

�😈 Donkey 💫thanks, It doesn't require serialized data

H

The other thing too is that it might be faster because you aren't passing an entire

Request

Request

/

Response

Response

around

�

😈 Donkey 💫OP•10/23/24, 3:57 PM

since the last time I read docs, now It has pretty new things, like passing a stub/function, amazing

C

code.JayS•10/23/24, 8:11 PM

hey, just a quick one. is there an easy way to restrict access to my cf worker? it handles my emails (via resend) but everyone can access the provided url

C

Constantin•10/24/24, 12:56 AM

hey there, i'm getting

Cannot bundle Node.js built-in "events"

Cannot bundle Node.js built-in "events"

Cannot bundle Node.js built-in "events"

Cannot bundle Node.js built-in "events"

error when building a worker. Does events is missing from the CF workers runtime?

H

Henry Black•10/24/24, 1:49 AM

Is there an easy/quick way of checking the compatibility of a node package with the workerd runtime? Or perhaps a resource that lists Cloudflare compatible packages?

C

Constantin•10/24/24, 6:02 AM

@Henry Black there's this place https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/

Cloudflare Docs

Runtime APIs | Cloudflare Workers docs

The Workers runtime is designed to be JavaScript standards compliant

and web-interoperable. Wherever possible, it uses web platform APIs, so that code can be reused across client and server, as well as across WinterCG

JavaScript runtimes.

Ccode.JayS hey, just a quick one. is there an easy way to restrict access to my cf worker? ...

A

Ashley•10/24/24, 7:50 AM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/wrangler/configuration/#inheritable-keys set workers_dev = false in your wrangler.toml

Cloudflare Docs

Configuration | Cloudflare Workers docs

Use a

wrangler.toml

wrangler.toml

configuration file to customize the development and deployment setup for your Worker project and other Developer Platform products.

G

Ghost Skull Gamer 1221•10/24/24, 1:05 PM

Hi can anyone help with an issue I am getting with workers?

I am experiencing an issue with the workers while uploading logs to my Elasticsearch engine. I am encountering the following:

When using the URL
https://gcb-dynamic-seal.tech-119.workers.dev/cd05db77-5f07-4359-7f92-48f98da85b00 I am able to send logs successfully.

However, with the custom domain
https://seal.cgcb.info/cd05db77-5f07-4359-7f92-48f98da85b00 I receive the following error:

"message": [
    "Failed to send log to Elasticsearch:",
    "error code: 521"

"message": [
    "Failed to send log to Elasticsearch:",
    "error code: 521"

"message": [
    "Failed to send log to Elasticsearch:",
    "error code: 521"

"message": [
    "Failed to send log to Elasticsearch:",
    "error code: 521"

CConstantin @Henry Black there's this place https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtim...

H

Henry Black•10/24/24, 1:16 PM

Thanks @Constantin, although I think I worded my questions badly, apologies. I was wondering if anyone knew of a way of easily finding out if an NPM package is compatible with workerd. I.e. if the package is using any non-supported Node apis.

Currently I have been installing a package and finding out but it's a little tedious and I was wondering if someone had created a list of packages that are safe for use in workerd (or knew how to quickly check without installing / digging through code)

H

Hacker Factor•10/24/24, 1:58 PM

Probably an easy question, but I can't find the answer. What are the volume limits (number of requests) on Workers? (Free, Pro, Business, etc) And is it per worker or per account?

HHacker Factor Probably an easy question, but I can't find the answer. What are the volume limi...

F

fry69•10/24/24, 2:03 PM

Anything missing here? -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/platform/limits/

Ffry69 Anything missing here? -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/platform/lim...

H

Hacker Factor•10/24/24, 2:07 PM

Thank you. Wait... I see the limit of 100,000 requests per day for free. Am I reading this right: for $5/mo, I get unlimited requests? (Sounds great if that's correct.)

HHacker Factor Thank you. Wait... I see the limit of 100,000 requests per day for free. Am I re...

F

fry69•10/24/24, 2:16 PM

No, not unlimited, you get 30 Mio CPU milliseconds for $5 per month

F

fry69•10/24/24, 2:16 PM

(CPU time not wall time)

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•10/24/24, 2:20 PM

Note that if you go over, you pay more

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•10/24/24, 2:20 PM

Not that it stops you from going over

H

Hacker Factor•10/24/24, 2:51 PM

What are the limits for the Pro plan (compared to the $5 paid plan)?

HHacker Factor What are the limits for the Pro plan (compared to the $5 paid plan)?

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•10/24/24, 2:59 PM

Your Wallet, basically

HHello, I’m Allie!Your Wallet, basically

H

Hacker Factor•10/24/24, 3:06 PM

That's not helping. With $5, I get 30 million requests per month. That's good. What if I need 60 million? With the $5 plan, I pay something like $0.30 per million, so that's an additional $9 for that month. What is the request limit for the Pro plan before getting overages? (If one of my services is getting 60 million requests per month, then wait until I bring over the other three services...)

HHacker Factor That's not helping. With $5, I get 30 million requests per month. That's good. W...

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•10/24/24, 3:09 PM

Basically, with the paid plan, you get the 10 million request/30 million CPU milliseconds a month included, then pay $0.3 per additional million requests, and $0.02 per additional million CPU milliseconds. That's it.

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•10/24/24, 3:10 PM

You can scale to billions of requests with the exact same pricing

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•10/24/24, 3:10 PM

There isn't a cap for "number" of requests at that point

H

Hacker Factor•10/24/24, 3:19 PM

Got it. Thank you.

D

dave•10/24/24, 6:30 PM

yarn create v1.22.22
warning package.json: No license field
[1/4] 🔍  Resolving packages...
[2/4] 🚚  Fetching packages...
error @achrinza/node-ipc@9.2.6: The engine "node" is incompatible with this module. Expected version "8 || 9 || 10 || 11 || 12 || 13 || 14 || 15 || 16 || 17 || 18 || 19". Got "22.9.0"
error Found incompatible module.

yarn create v1.22.22
warning package.json: No license field
[1/4] 🔍  Resolving packages...
[2/4] 🚚  Fetching packages...
error @achrinza/node-ipc@9.2.6: The engine "node" is incompatible with this module. Expected version "8 || 9 || 10 || 11 || 12 || 13 || 14 || 15 || 16 || 17 || 18 || 19". Got "22.9.0"
error Found incompatible module.

yarn create v1.22.22
warning package.json: No license field
[1/4] 🔍  Resolving packages...
[2/4] 🚚  Fetching packages...
error @achrinza/node-ipc@9.2.6: The engine "node" is incompatible with this module. Expected version "8 || 9 || 10 || 11 || 12 || 13 || 14 || 15 || 16 || 17 || 18 || 19". Got "22.9.0"
error Found incompatible module.

yarn create v1.22.22
warning package.json: No license field
[1/4] 🔍  Resolving packages...
[2/4] 🚚  Fetching packages...
error @achrinza/node-ipc@9.2.6: The engine "node" is incompatible with this module. Expected version "8 || 9 || 10 || 11 || 12 || 13 || 14 || 15 || 16 || 17 || 18 || 19". Got "22.9.0"
error Found incompatible module.

What causes an old version of

@achrinza/node-ipc

@achrinza/node-ipc

@achrinza/node-ipc

@achrinza/node-ipc to be used when when I run

yarn create cloudflare@latest workflows-starter-hello-world-1 --template "cloudflare/workflows-starter"

yarn create cloudflare@latest workflows-starter-hello-world-1 --template "cloudflare/workflows-starter"

yarn create cloudflare@latest workflows-starter-hello-world-1 --template "cloudflare/workflows-starter"

yarn create cloudflare@latest workflows-starter-hello-world-1 --template "cloudflare/workflows-starter"? There is a newer version of

@achrinza/node-ipc

@achrinza/node-ipc

@achrinza/node-ipc

@achrinza/node-ipc that supports version 22 of node, so I don't get why it's insisting on trying an older version.

A

Avi•10/24/24, 7:18 PM

is anyone aware of ratelimiting or other limits that would cause

fetch()

fetch()

requests initiated by a DurableObject to sometimes take exactly 10 seconds longer than they otherwise would?

A

Avi•10/24/24, 7:19 PM

typically these requests take < 300ms. sometimes however, they take 10000+(<300)ms

A

Avi•10/24/24, 7:19 PM

i.e. we never see 2 seconds, 3 seconds, 9 seconds... just < 300ms and ~10.1 - 10.3 seconds

A

Avi•10/24/24, 7:20 PM

this happens for requests to multiple completely unrelated services

A

Avi•10/24/24, 7:20 PM

so i'm wondering if there's some sort of limit happening we're not aware of

A

Advany•10/24/24, 8:21 PM

deploying is giving me: ✘ [ERROR] response.errors is not iterable

A

Advany•10/24/24, 8:22 PM

AAdvany deploying is giving me: ✘ [ERROR] response.errors is not iterable

C

Chaika•10/24/24, 8:24 PM

try again?

C

Chaika•10/24/24, 8:24 PM

I just got one of those from a different api:

Non-Success with no errors, response body: { "code": 1003, "error": "auth.jwt_headers_invalid" }

but it succeeded on retry, hmmm

AAdvany Click to see attachment

F

Frank•10/24/24, 8:24 PM

same here

F

Frank•10/24/24, 8:32 PM

worked after 3 retries

CChaika I just got one of those from a different api: > Non-Success with no errors, resp...

A

Advany•10/24/24, 8:34 PM

jup, working again!

B

Brett Willis•10/25/24, 5:50 AM

Hi team. How exactly is the open source

workerd

workerd

related to the production runtime?
Is

workerd

workerd

running in prod with extras wrapped around it?
Or does prod apply closed source patches to

workerd

workerd

?
Or is

workerd

workerd

just a similar but separate codebase?
I ask because if I look at a particular implementation detail in

workerd

workerd

e.g. polyfills or how the event loop works is that how it is in prod?
Also if I were to contribute to

workerd

workerd

(if allowed) would that make it to prod?

W

Walshy•10/25/24, 5:54 AM

Yes, the Workers runtime is just an extension to workerd with the internal Cloudflare bits. Most functionality is within workerd, just things like limiting, internal routing etc are in the closed source runtime

and yes, if you contribute to workerd, it'll make it to prod. We update the workerd module frequently

C

Constantin•10/25/24, 7:41 AM

howdy, is it possible to use my own sass platform custom domain for dcv TXT record?

CConstantin howdy, is it possible to use my own sass platform custom domain for dcv TXT reco...

F

fry69•10/25/24, 7:58 AM

You

_acme

_acme

CNAME (from your sass domain/platform) needs to point to Cloudflare for them to be able to issue certificates.

F

fry69•10/25/24, 8:00 AM

This effectively disables any ACME challenge on your own behalf for this host, but apparently this is what you want?

F

fry69•10/25/24, 8:02 AM

S

syph•10/25/24, 2:10 PM

Hello , does anyone have a repo or a tutorial they can share on how to implement social login securely with cloudflare workers, or is it possible at all or do i have to have a server. thanks

Ssyph Hello , does anyone have a repo or a tutorial they can share on how to implement...

F

fry69•10/25/24, 2:15 PM

Seems possible with e.g. GitHub -> https://github.com/gr2m/cloudflare-worker-github-oauth-login

A

ac•10/25/24, 3:02 PM

I'm having an issue again with worker builds just getting stuck at "Queued" forever (first discussed workers-and-pages-discussions). Only pushed changes for the single worker, it immediately changed to "Queued" (no other workers in the account were triggered, which is correct). Just stuck on "Queued" forever....

A

ac•10/25/24, 3:05 PM

Nevermind I guess, it fixed itself after about 10 minutes..

Not really clear what it was waiting on since no builds were running in my account. Is there a global build queue?

Aac Nevermind I guess, it fixed itself after about 10 minutes.. 🤔 Not really clear ...

F

fry69•10/25/24, 3:08 PM

I assume there is a global distribution step inside the build process which can things slow down if the acknowledgements do not come back in time, but 10 minutes sounds excessive. Then again I have no real clue.

F

fry69•10/25/24, 3:10 PM

Also if those build processes happen in the CI or via pull from Cloudflare from GitHub 10 min (as an outlier) still seems fine. I know mandatory check pipelines which are measured in hours.

R

Raiyan•10/25/24, 3:16 PM

is there any way to increase worker size limit without upgrading to paid plan? I've a very small application, might get at most 100 req/day, most probably used by only me, but I couldn't compact it to 1MB limit, and getting paid plan just for the size limit doesn't seem feasible

thanks, It doesn't require serialized data

Similar Threads