I got this error, anywhere I can find the filesize limits? { "stack": "AiError: 3006: Request

MMartijn I got this error, anywhere I can find the filesize limits? { "stack": "Ai...

F

fry69•10/30/24, 10:10 AM

Sadly this limit is not mentioned here -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers-ai/platform/limits/

F

fry69•10/30/24, 10:12 AM

I doubt the 100MB (and greater) request size limit applies to AI workers- -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/platform/limits/#request-limits

M

MartijnOP•10/30/24, 10:14 AM

The image is like 3,5mb so

Ffry69 Sadly this limit is not mentioned here -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/work...

M

MartijnOP•10/30/24, 10:16 AM

And yeah there's no limit so

MMartijn The image is like 3,5mb so

F

fry69•10/30/24, 10:19 AM

If the raw image size is 3,5mb this might blow up ~30% with base64 encoding, some AI APIs I know have a 4MB hard limit for image size (in base64).

F

fry69•10/30/24, 10:19 AM

Dunno if this applies to Cloudflare AI though.

M

MartijnOP•10/30/24, 10:20 AM

Hmmm, is there a way to easily compress the image in a worker?

MMartijn Hmmm, is there a way to easily compress the image in a worker?

F

fry69•10/30/24, 10:20 AM

Cloudflare has a separate service for this -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/images/

M

MartijnOP•10/30/24, 10:21 AM

Yeah, not really what's needed here I think. I want to use AI to classify some images but might not work if there's such a small limit

F

fry69•10/30/24, 10:21 AM

You can of course do this manually inside the worker, but you have to code this yourself (you'll kind of pay for the conversion in both ways, either via the image service or via CPU milliseconds for your worker).

M

MartijnOP•10/30/24, 10:22 AM

Thanks for the help anyway

Original message was deleted

F

fry69•10/30/24, 11:33 AM

?crossposting -> https://discord.com/channels/595317990191398933/909458221419356210/1301143712788774963

F

Flare•10/30/24, 11:33 AM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at ⁠#

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

MMartijn I got this error, anywhere I can find the filesize limits? { "stack": "Ai...

M

MartijnOP•10/30/24, 12:31 PM

Anyone from cloudflare who could officially answer this?

MMartijn Anyone from cloudflare who could officially answer this?

C

Cyb3r-Jak3•10/30/24, 12:37 PM

I’d recommend asking in #workers-ai

M

MartijnOP•10/30/24, 12:37 PM

Good one

0

0xwei_hup•10/30/24, 1:56 PM

is the pulumi/terraform provider don't support workers static assets yet is it?

SS0ns0fAnarchy https://www.npmjs.com/package/isomorphic-git/v/0.0.21 I am trying to use this w...

F

fry69•10/30/24, 2:36 PM

Git heavily relies on a working filesystem (as git effectively uses the filesystem as its database), I don't know if a VFS shim around R2/S3 will ever make git happy. It may be easier to write/modify a git implementation to use R2/S3 operations directly and skip the VFS layer (like Microsoft did with ditching VFSForGit and moving everything in their git fork)

D

DiamondDragon•10/30/24, 2:54 PM

Quick maybe dumb question. Can you define a worker entry point in a worker and access and call the class and it’s methods in the same worker? I understand with RPC you can export the class in the same file as the module default export and it can be used in other workers. But wondering if it can be used in the source worker and other workers

DDiamondDragon Quick maybe dumb question. Can you define a worker entry point in a worker and a...

I

ixixix•10/30/24, 3:05 PM

I think you can bind it directly within that same worker and access it via

env

env

, here’s a demo: https://github.com/cloudflare/js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo/tree/main/public-admin-api-interfaces/db-service. I haven’t tried it myself though

Iixixix I think you can bind it directly within that same worker and access it via `env`...

D

DiamondDragon•10/30/24, 3:15 PM

Thanks I’ll try that out

Iixixix I think you can bind it directly within that same worker and access it via `env`...

D

DiamondDragon•10/30/24, 3:22 PM

I’m also gonna try calling a rpc in a workflow. Wondering if that will work

G

Grifed•10/30/24, 4:54 PM

Hello everyone, have any of you tried to deploy nextjs on workers?

GGrifed Hello everyone, have any of you tried to deploy nextjs on workers?

F

fry69•10/30/24, 4:57 PM

See here -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/frameworks/framework-guides/nextjs/

Ffry69 See here -> https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/frameworks/framework-guide...

G

Grifed•10/30/24, 5:08 PM

Thanks ! Which is better cloudflare pages or workers for nextjs

GGrifed Thanks ! Which is better cloudflare pages or workers for nextjs

F

fry69•10/30/24, 5:12 PM

No clue. Workers are more up-to-date and powerful though.

Iixixix I think you can bind it directly within that same worker and access it via `env`...

D

DiamondDragon•10/30/24, 5:42 PM

Working through this example... Is this bug described here still outstanding? https://github.com/cloudflare/js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo/blob/12f7f2e10a4543c229554bcec4cba139e16594ce/public-admin-api-interfaces/db-service/wrangler.init.toml

✔ script to run › worker:dev-local
$ wrangler dev

 ⛅️ wrangler 3.84.0
-------------------

Using vars defined in .dev.vars
Your worker has access to the following bindings:
- Workflows:
  - SEARCH_WORKFLOW: SearchWorkflow
  - TEST_WORKFLOW: TestWorkflow
- Services:
  - TEST_SERVICE: 🔴 test-service#TestService
- Vars:
  - TURSO_TOKEN: "(hidden)"
  - TURSO_URL: "(hidden)"
  - WEBSHARE_PROXY_URL: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCESS_KEY_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY: "(hidden)"
▲ [WARNING] This worker is bound to live services: TEST_SERVICE (test-service#TestService)


[wrangler:inf] Ready on http://localhost:8787
⎔ Starting local server...

✘ [ERROR] The Workers runtime failed to start. There is likely additional logging output above.


If you think this is a bug then please create an issue at https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/new/choose

✔ script to run › worker:dev-local
$ wrangler dev

 ⛅️ wrangler 3.84.0
-------------------

Using vars defined in .dev.vars
Your worker has access to the following bindings:
- Workflows:
  - SEARCH_WORKFLOW: SearchWorkflow
  - TEST_WORKFLOW: TestWorkflow
- Services:
  - TEST_SERVICE: 🔴 test-service#TestService
- Vars:
  - TURSO_TOKEN: "(hidden)"
  - TURSO_URL: "(hidden)"
  - WEBSHARE_PROXY_URL: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCESS_KEY_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY: "(hidden)"
▲ [WARNING] This worker is bound to live services: TEST_SERVICE (test-service#TestService)


[wrangler:inf] Ready on http://localhost:8787
⎔ Starting local server...

✘ [ERROR] The Workers runtime failed to start. There is likely additional logging output above.


If you think this is a bug then please create an issue at https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/new/choose

✔ script to run › worker:dev-local
$ wrangler dev

 ⛅️ wrangler 3.84.0
-------------------

Using vars defined in .dev.vars
Your worker has access to the following bindings:
- Workflows:
  - SEARCH_WORKFLOW: SearchWorkflow
  - TEST_WORKFLOW: TestWorkflow
- Services:
  - TEST_SERVICE: 🔴 test-service#TestService
- Vars:
  - TURSO_TOKEN: "(hidden)"
  - TURSO_URL: "(hidden)"
  - WEBSHARE_PROXY_URL: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCESS_KEY_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY: "(hidden)"
▲ [WARNING] This worker is bound to live services: TEST_SERVICE (test-service#TestService)


[wrangler:inf] Ready on http://localhost:8787
⎔ Starting local server...

✘ [ERROR] The Workers runtime failed to start. There is likely additional logging output above.


If you think this is a bug then please create an issue at https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/new/choose

✔ script to run › worker:dev-local
$ wrangler dev

 ⛅️ wrangler 3.84.0
-------------------

Using vars defined in .dev.vars
Your worker has access to the following bindings:
- Workflows:
  - SEARCH_WORKFLOW: SearchWorkflow
  - TEST_WORKFLOW: TestWorkflow
- Services:
  - TEST_SERVICE: 🔴 test-service#TestService
- Vars:
  - TURSO_TOKEN: "(hidden)"
  - TURSO_URL: "(hidden)"
  - WEBSHARE_PROXY_URL: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_ACCESS_KEY_ID: "(hidden)"
  - CLOUDFLARE_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY: "(hidden)"
▲ [WARNING] This worker is bound to live services: TEST_SERVICE (test-service#TestService)


[wrangler:inf] Ready on http://localhost:8787
⎔ Starting local server...

✘ [ERROR] The Workers runtime failed to start. There is likely additional logging output above.


If you think this is a bug then please create an issue at https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/new/choose

GitHub

js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo/public-admin-api-interfaces/db-service/...

Contribute to cloudflare/js-rpc-and-entrypoints-demo development by creating an account on GitHub.

A

Avi•10/30/24, 6:34 PM

is there a way to have a subrequest outlive the parent request in a worker?

A

Avi•10/30/24, 6:35 PM

e.g. POST /foo -> worker kicks off an internal fetch() to /someapi, meanwhile responds to the POST /foo with (202)

A

Avi•10/30/24, 6:35 PM

in my testing the subrequest is getting killed when the 202 response is sent

AAvi e.g. POST /foo -> worker kicks off an internal fetch() to /someapi, meanwhile re...

C

Chaika•10/30/24, 6:40 PM

ctx.waitUntil

C

Chaika•10/30/24, 6:40 PM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/context/#waituntil

Cloudflare Docs

Context (ctx) | Cloudflare Workers docs

The Context API in Cloudflare Workers, including waitUntil and passThroughOnException.

C

Chaika•10/30/24, 6:41 PM

you only get 30s of real time though for it to finish, or it'll get cancelled anyway

A

Avi•10/30/24, 7:42 PM

got it!

A

Avi•10/30/24, 7:42 PM

that works like a charm, thanks very much

A

Aster•10/30/24, 9:50 PM

Hey

I am trying to call a DO from Worker B when DO is exported from worker A.
Worker A looks like this:

# wrangler.toml B
name = "worker-B"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do", script_name="worker-A" }
]

# wrangler.toml B
name = "worker-B"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do", script_name="worker-A" }
]

# wrangler.toml B
name = "worker-B"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do", script_name="worker-A" }
]

# wrangler.toml B
name = "worker-B"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do", script_name="worker-A" }
]

# wrangler.toml A
name = "worker-A"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do" }
]

[[migrations]]
tag = "v1"
new_sqlite_classes = ["Do"]

# wrangler.toml A
name = "worker-A"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do" }
]

[[migrations]]
tag = "v1"
new_sqlite_classes = ["Do"]

# wrangler.toml A
name = "worker-A"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do" }
]

[[migrations]]
tag = "v1"
new_sqlite_classes = ["Do"]

# wrangler.toml A
name = "worker-A"
# ...
[env.dev.durable_objects]
bindings = [
  { name = "DO", class_name = "Do" }
]

[[migrations]]
tag = "v1"
new_sqlite_classes = ["Do"]

And the index.ts in worker B is a fetch calling a DO stub (with RPC), and exporting the fetch.
On Worker A, it's a simple fetch + DO sqlite, both exported.

Worker A deploys fine and works fine with DO. I get this error on deploy for worker B (that should use the DO from worker A):

Cannot create binding for class in script 'worker-A' that does not exist [code: 10061]

Cannot create binding for class in script 'worker-A' that does not exist [code: 10061]

Cannot create binding for class in script 'worker-A' that does not exist [code: 10061]

Cannot create binding for class in script 'worker-A' that does not exist [code: 10061]

Any idea what I could be doing wrong?

A

Aster•10/30/24, 10:07 PM

Found it! the script name needs to be worker-A-dev

DDean as far as i can see - despite the API endpoint, it's impossible to use /settings...

D

Dean•10/30/24, 10:59 PM

guessing i'm out of luck? can't really use D1 if you can't bind anything on the fly.

DDean guessing i'm out of luck? can't really use D1 if you can't bind anything on the ...

H

Hello, I’m Allie!•10/30/24, 11:13 PM

Have you tried using SQLite DOs instead of D1?

HHello, I’m Allie!Have you tried using SQLite DOs instead of D1?

D

Dean•10/30/24, 11:22 PM

1G storage is prohibitive for us. I'm just not sure why the API just returns success = true but nothing happens

DDean guessing i'm out of luck? can't really use D1 if you can't bind anything on the ...

K

kian•10/30/24, 11:28 PM

How "on the fly" are you looking for? It wouldn't affect that Worker invocation that calls it.

Kkian How "on the fly" are you looking for? It wouldn't affect that Worker invocation ...

D

Dean•10/30/24, 11:40 PM

my plan is when someone clicks something from my CF pages site, it creates a D1 database and we need to bind that to 3 CF workers. It doesn't have to be instant but quick enough that it's not waiting 5 - 10 minutes

K

kian•10/30/24, 11:51 PM

How are you using the API? Wrangler itself uses it so it should be fine

Kkian How are you using the API? Wrangler itself uses it so it should be fine

D

Dean•10/31/24, 12:02 AM

cant use wrangler because its done by the client in pages

D

Dean•10/31/24, 12:05 AM

i'm using this endpoint: https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/worker-script-patch-settings but it just reutrns sucess = true and bindings are never updated

Cloudflare API Documentation

Interact with Cloudflare's products and services via the Cloudflare API

D

Dean•10/31/24, 12:05 AM

even though it does generate a new deployment

D

Dean•10/31/24, 12:05 AM

afaik - as long as it's formatted right, it'll always respond success no matter the input

K

kian•10/31/24, 12:06 AM

What's your payload?

D

Dean•10/31/24, 12:11 AM

Sending body: ---------------formdata45241039827298346
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="settings"

{"settings":{"bindings":[{"database_id":"821eb65a-ebdd-49ef-aa0b-878f65b57d57","name":"inbound-5772b3b2-6bca-42ed-938b-f3e17b2781ca","type":"d1","id":"821eb65a-ebdd-49ef-aa0b-878f65b57d57"}]}}
---------------formdata45241039827298346--
Worker binding response: {
"result": {
"placement": {},
"compatibility_date": "2024-09-08",
"compatibility_flags": [],
"usage_model": "standard",
"tags": [],
"tail_consumers": [],
"logpush": false,
"bindings": [
{
"database_id": "2206f7ed-1476-40a0-9758-f1bc3d47e5ad",
"id": "2206f7ed-1476-40a0-9758-f1bc3d47e5ad",
"name": "2206f7ed-1476-40a0-9758-f1bc3d47e5ad",
"type": "d1"
},

]
},
"success": true,
"errors": [],
"messages": []
}
Worker binding process completed

I got this error, anywhere I can find the filesize limits? { "stack": "AiError: 3006: Request

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads