Example from their tests: https://github.com/thx/resvg-js/blob/97944eb0117f3d2135abe4d18be6c467103e2
Example from their tests: https://github.com/thx/resvg-js/blob/97944eb0117f3d2135abe4d18be6c467103e2caa/__test__/wasm.spec.ts#L229
J(you won't be able to use
fs
Eu can store it as blobs
Jyeah it worked. Stored the font in the cloudflare storage and fetched it from there and converted to ArrayBuffer and used it.
SHow do you handle multiple workers running on localhost when you want to make requests from the front end using a single URL (localhost:8787)? Once deployed, it’s possible to set up a route for each worker, but how do you manage this setup locally?
JThe resvg package is big And now I have issue with deployment
JI am on free plan
Mhi, is it a performance problem if I use a "Cloudflare Snippet" to route requests to my worker instead of directly using worker routes? The problem I have is that I'd need so many different worker routes to get it to match everything it needs to match on /mypath because /mypath has to support various cultures in front: /(en|fr|de)/mypath <--- and this regex isn't allowed in worker routes
Jwhat's the recommended way to run a one off script locally?
Jtsx chokes on this import
import { DurableObject } from "cloudflare:workers";Error [ERR_UNSUPPORTED_ESM_URL_SCHEME]: Only URLs with a scheme in: file, data, and node are supported by the default ESM loader. Received protocol 'cloudflare:'
SMy image-transforming worker just stopped working. Returnig response ignoring cf: image: {width: 300, height: 300, fit: 'cover', draw: null}.
Is anyone familiar with changes? I had it before with billing issues but all looks normal.
Is anyone familiar with changes? I had it before with billing issues but all looks normal.
FOpen a ticket?
F?support
FTo contact Cloudflare Support about an issue, please visit the Support Portal and fill in the form on the portal. After submission, you will receive confirmation over email.
Some issues, such as Account or Billing related issues, cannot be solved by the community.
Any plan level (including Free plans) can open tickets for Account, Billing or Registrar ticket categories. Make sure to select the correct category to ensure it goes to the right place.
For more information on the methods by which you can contact Support for your plan level, see Contacting Cloudflare Support - Cloudflare Docs
Some issues, such as Account or Billing related issues, cannot be solved by the community.
Any plan level (including Free plans) can open tickets for Account, Billing or Registrar ticket categories. Make sure to select the correct category to ensure it goes to the right place.
For more information on the methods by which you can contact Support for your plan level, see Contacting Cloudflare Support - Cloudflare Docs
SAre you aware is support ticket login would be the same as account login?
.Does
@cloudflare/workers
Chey there, do you have any snappy suggestion for generating pdfs with a worker?
Coh, found the lazyinvoice one
森I think I might have found a bug with miniflare, can someone also confirm this is also a issue?
Reproduction step:
Passing a ReadableStream through a service binding RPC call
Reproduction step:
Passing a ReadableStream through a service binding RPC call
森this is what it throws
森and if you attempt to pass a Request with a body as a RPC call, you will get:
森i feel like RPC with miniflare is exteremely buggy and I hope I'm not the one feeling about this
森i think i figured out what might be happening, i'm trying to upload a file via rpc binding by passing readable stream; while the document says it supports passing readable stream / writable stream, the source code of miniflare seems to only support the case where we pass in readable stream and the rpc code expects a writable stream (or the other way around) to be returned by the code
森i'm not sure if this is a bug, or a documentation error
森can anyone confirm this?
森(i'm leaning towards as a bug as it's an assertion error and not a explicit error being thrown)
DI recommend checking if there's a github issue for this, and if not, opening one - I also don't see a reason why it shouldn't work, and even if that is the case, the team can confirm
森closest thing i could find is:
https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/6047
which is never really fixed (this really hurts the dev experience btw)
but this is related to the second issue with RPC calls and not the first
https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/6047
which is never really fixed (this really hurts the dev experience btw)
but this is related to the second issue with RPC calls and not the first
GitHub
Which Cloudflare product(s) does this pertain to? R2, Miniflare What version(s) of the tool(s) are you using? 3.60.3 [wrangler], 3.20240610.0 [miniflare] What version of Node are you using? 18.18.2...
LHow do you call the bolt thing kind of communication?
LThat's not true RPC right? Because RPC would generally involve a network boundary. A request going from microservice X to microservice Y through a service mesh. But in this case the two services are colocated in the same workspace so there's no actual network request.
森just service binding, you can also invoke it the HTTP way (and not RPC)
森the rest i guess is implementation details, i don't think there's a guarantee that the two services would be in the same workspace or even server at all; and in reality, most cross application boundary communications uses some form of RPC anyways, where they are on the same machine or not
Dmy worker sends requests to a specific server on the cloudflare network. it's been working for months and it was working this morning but i just started receiving this error out of nowhere (no deployed code changes in the last few weeks on my worker).
can an employee confirm whether a change was made recently to block access to certain cloudflare ips from workers?
can an employee confirm whether a change was made recently to block access to certain cloudflare ips from workers?
Lbut that's just a fake HTTP, it's still using same magic under the hood
I^ RPC is invariant of transport
IYou can RPC over a unix socket, over IPC boundaries, or over a network connection
IOr even RPC in shared memory as is the case with some apps (see Tauri for example)
森... sorry can i vent for a bit?
森or if someone could let me know is there a better solution
森how exactly do you detect if the worker is in dev mode or in production mode?
森it looks like the official solution is to add [env.dev] and add something like ENVIRONMENT = "dev"
森if that's the case....
森then why is the majority of keys "NOT INHERITABLE"
森why?
if it works both in staging / prod and dev, why should i have to copy every single vars under env.dev ?
if it works both in staging / prod and dev, why should i have to copy every single vars under env.dev ?
森i have like an array of vars that define a certain default output
森does that mean i have to copy the whole thing under [env.dev]?
森ok, if that's the case, and I decided that I would change the non-dev vars just because i want a different set of output, does that mean i need to remember to also change env.dev too? I already can see myself debugging only to realize i forgot to change the [env.dev] too because the non dev vars were changed...
森....omg
森now running
wrangler dev --env devCannot access '{functionName}' as we couldn't find a 'wrangler dev' session for service "{service}" to proxy to.I found the solution
