I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocation in September then

I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocation in September then October to compare, see if each instance is using roughly 10x or if theres some small amount of instances hogging time

11984 Ford Laser I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocatio...

MetaSky•12/2/24, 2:01 AM

ok, i will try it

11984 Ford Laser I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocatio...

MetaSky•12/2/24, 2:25 AM

My worker's script in September is deleted and I redeployed the worker scripts in October, so i can't compare with September and October. So the cpu time calculation issue I mentioned before is just a presentation issue and won't affect my bill amount, is that what you mean?

MetaSky•12/2/24, 3:21 AM

If I deploy workerd to the server by myself, can I do performance test for cpu time and request?

GitHub

GitHub - cloudflare/workerd: The JavaScript / Wasm runtime that pow...

The JavaScript / Wasm runtime that powers Cloudflare Workers - cloudflare/workerd

sodepr•12/2/24, 4:33 AM

Hi fork,

Does anyone test static assets with Worker?

The document said that:

Requests to static assets are free and unlimited.

Requests to static assets are free and unlimited.

However, when I accessed the static assets, it increased the

Requests today

Requests today

immediately.

Ssodepr Hi fork, Does anyone test static assets with Worker? The document said that: `...

Isaac McFadyen•12/2/24, 4:51 AM

?channel-crossposting

SuperHelpflare•12/2/24, 4:51 AM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

IIsaac McFadyen ?channel-crossposting

sodepr•12/2/24, 4:53 AM

No, I ask the question for this channel, and give a suggestion in the suggestion feature channel

Ssodepr No, I ask the question for this channel, and give a suggestion in the suggestion...

Isaac McFadyen•12/2/24, 4:55 AM

Does cloudflare support the cache to prevent call worker everytime?

You asked this in #workers-feature-suggestions. Please try and keep conversations to one channel to avoid confusion for people trying to help.

IIsaac McFadyen > Does cloudflare support the cache to prevent call worker everytime? You asked ...

sodepr•12/2/24, 4:56 AM

Ok, thank you ^^

MMetaSky If I deploy [workerd](https://github.com/cloudflare/workerd) to the server by my...

1984 Ford LaserOP•12/2/24, 5:31 AM

Im pretty sure the runtime is specifically built to not be able to accurately measure time for functions beyond when I/O occurs

thols•12/2/24, 8:14 AM

Hi guys , new to hono and cloudflare , while implementing rate limit to hono and deploying in cloudflare , i am facing an issue ! this is what i used : https://www.npmjs.com/package/@hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare , and i attached the issue , i am already created a KV and set the namespace id ! the ratelimiting works good in local but not in deployment why , what am i missing ? and also added the kv namespace binding in the CF dashboard

npm

@hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare

. Latest version: 0.2.1, last published: 3 months ago. Start using @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare in your project by running

npm i @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare

npm i @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare

. There is 1 other project in the npm registry using @hono-rate-limiter/cloudflare.

Original message was deleted

thols•12/2/24, 8:22 AM

yeah , i think i get it now , but can you pls clarrify this -> for this rate limiting i have to create a KV right , but when i create a KV , it gives the alhpa numeric value which i used in the wrangler.toml file

Original message was deleted

thols•12/2/24, 8:26 AM

oh sry for that , can use pls explain what to do next to implement ratelimiting ? what i done till now is , the local setup - which is working fine ! what to do to make this work in the deployment ?

akashra•12/2/24, 9:34 AM

What is the generally accepted mechanism for having sessions written and looked up when using cloudflare Workers? The solutions I've come across seem to suggest using either KV or D1, but at 1 million and 50m requests or writes/month, of which you would then need at least one for every single worker call, that seems like it could quickly eat in usage.

akashra•12/2/24, 9:44 AM

Ugh, I somehow left out a rather critical/important word from that paragraph lol.

Omar Abid•12/2/24, 9:44 AM

I am trying to figure out the pricing structure of WebSockets and DO. I got WebSockets working on a "normal" worker and say the cost is 3.75GB/s. Now, I pass the WebSocket connection to a DO, for the same time interval, I get billed 0.29GB/s. I am not using Hibernation, yet; so I guess my questions is, is DO priced differently to workers and is this just for WebSockets?

Original message was deleted

akashra•12/2/24, 9:50 AM

Yeah, not for anything more than a tiny amount of data.

akashra•12/2/24, 9:51 AM

I'm not going to use a JWT for strategies like caching data across calls and for session lifespan.

Constantin•12/2/24, 10:18 AM

i'm using

og-img

og-img

lib

however, i'm getting this error:

CompileError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Wasm code generation disallowed by embedder

CompileError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): Wasm code generation disallowed by embedder

OOmar Abid I am trying to figure out the pricing structure of WebSockets and DO. I got WebS...

Omar Abid•12/2/24, 10:20 AM

oh the billing happens in the DO itself not the worker

meai1•12/2/24, 1:43 PM

are workers.dev urls sufficiently private or can they be tied back to the account holder somehow? I want to create informational pages for an online community but that community is full of trolls/bad people so I dont want them to know my real info tied to my cloudflare account

Mmeai1 are workers.dev urls sufficiently private or can they be tied back to the accoun...

Hello, I’m Allie!•12/2/24, 2:28 PM

The prefix is tied to your account, so if you use it for anything else, they would be connected

Grifed•12/2/24, 5:41 PM

Hey

, I was wondering if it's possible to set a TTL expiration for objects in an R2 bucket, similar to what we can do with KV? Thanks!

Grifed•12/2/24, 5:47 PM

Got it, thanks for the clarification!

Walshy•12/2/24, 8:29 PM

Not related to Workers

Walshy•12/2/24, 8:30 PM

But there's no fix, it's just simple rate limiting. JDA handles it

Original message was deleted

sodepr•12/2/24, 8:33 PM

I need help

Walshy•12/2/24, 8:46 PM

!ban 1262350034868113469 scam

Flare•12/2/24, 8:46 PM

:zep_check: Banned patrickdavid0390 (Case #2591) (user notified with a direct message)

Hebilicious•12/2/24, 9:21 PM

Hello everyone, if I were to deploy some frontend project to Cloudflare, I would need to choose between Pages and Workers Static Assets. The recommendation are a little bit ambiguous to me, from what I can understand, we can use both and they'll eventually be the same.

But in the meantime, I should prefer Worker Static Assets over Pages, right ?

HHebilicious Hello everyone, if I were to deploy some frontend project to Cloudflare, I would...

Ashley•12/2/24, 9:35 PM

Probably, but there are some Pages-specific features that are not yet availlable for Static Assets (see https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/static-assets/compatibility-matrix/). Generally though, they should converge over time is my understanding.

Yunfi•12/2/24, 11:34 PM

I know that wrangler use esbuild to bundle code. Is there a way i can pass additional flags/configurations to esbuild when dev or deploy?

IIsaac McFadyen What I'm wondering is if the actual billing data increased by 10x on your invoic...

MetaSky•12/3/24, 2:17 AM

This is a comparison of the October and September bills, from the bills, it is true that the cpu time calculation has been increased by 10 times, according to the current calculation method to calculate the cpu time in September, it is not possible to correspond to the September bill, I would like to confirm what kind of calculation is correct, is it the calculation method of the September bill, or the current calculation method of multiplying it by 10 times.

MMetaSky This is a comparison of the October and September bills, from the bills, it is t...

1984 Ford LaserOP•12/3/24, 4:32 AM

I'm not sure because I don't use all of CF's products, but could some other service be contributing to Worker CPU MS that isn't covered by WorkersOverviewRequestsAdaptiveGroups? Like did you start using something else that uses that same billing metric? Just speculation

11984 Ford Laser I'm not sure because I don't use all of CF's products, but could some other serv...

MetaSky•12/3/24, 4:46 AM

No, I've only deployed the workers script, and I'd like an official answer about the cpu time calculation.

MMetaSky No, I've only deployed the workers script, and I'd like an official answer about...

1984 Ford LaserOP•12/3/24, 4:46 AM

Have you filed a billing ticket? Discord probably won't get a satisfactory official response

11984 Ford Laser Have you filed a billing ticket? Discord *probably* won't get a satisfactory off...

MetaSky•12/3/24, 4:50 AM

Thanks a lot, I'll try to submit a billing ticket to https://community.cloudflare.com

MMetaSky This is a comparison of the October and September bills, from the bills, it is t...

Omar Abid•12/3/24, 5:43 AM

I am not sure I understand your question. It seems your usage went x10 and so did your billing costs?

OOmar Abid I am not sure I understand your question. It seems your usage went x10 and so di...

MetaSky•12/3/24, 7:26 AM

What I mean is that the cpu time data I queried with the October api matched the October bill,
but the cpu time data I queried with the same api for September didn't match the September bill,
if cloudflare x10s the cpu time calculation strategy in October and that's what happens.
Because I compared my September and October without changing the worker's script code.

GuillaumeLakano•12/3/24, 8:16 AM

Hi! We trying to move Pages to a « Static Assets » (Worker with Static Assets but without any Worker), because this seems that Pages will disappear at some point in the future and be replaced with this new product.

But both product doesn't have the same behavior for routing:

Imagine this structure:
/file.html
/folder/index.html

Pages:
« domain.tld/file.html » => status 200 and return /file.html
« domain.tld/folder/ » => status 200 and return /folder/index.html

Static Assets with html_handling = 'auto-trailing-slash' :

« domain.tld/file.html » => 307 to « /file » and the 2nd request return /file.html with status 200
« domain.tld/folder/ » => 200 and return /folder/index.html

Static Assets with html_handling = 'force-trailing-slash' :

« domain.tld/file.html » => 307 to « /file/ » and the 2nd request return /file.html with status 200
« domain.tld/folder/ » => 200 and return /folder/index.html

Static Assets with html_handling = 'drop-trailing-slash' :

« domain.tld/file.html » => 307 to « /file » and the 2nd request return /file.html with status 200
« domain.tld/folder/ » => 307 to « /folder » and the 2nd request return /folder/index.html with status 200

Static Assets with html_handling = 'none' :

« domain.tld/file.html » => 200 and return /file.html
« domain.tld/folder/ » => 404

How can we have the exact behavior of Pages, without any redirection 307 ?
May be we need a new option like html_handling = 'standard' ( whatever the name ) for acting like Pages and standard webservers ?

MMetaSky What I mean is that the cpu time data I queried with the October api matched the...

Omar Abid•12/3/24, 9:33 AM

Not changing the code doesn't mean that usage didn't change. If you are using DO/WebSockets, you might have some left resources that are burning cpu times. You'll need to watch your cpu consumption and find out where it's coming from.

OOmar Abid Not changing the code doesn't mean that usage didn't change. If you are using DO...

MetaSky•12/3/24, 9:57 AM

Thank you very much for your help, but that doesn't explain the difference in cpu time calculation between October and September!

kamama•12/3/24, 1:24 PM

Hi, may i know if this will keep produce cost?

import { connect } from 'cloudflare:sockets';

// if keep socket connection here will charge CPU time?
const socket = connect(gopherAddr);


export default {
  async fetch(req): Promise<Response> {
  }
}

import { connect } from 'cloudflare:sockets';

// if keep socket connection here will charge CPU time?
const socket = connect(gopherAddr);


export default {
  async fetch(req): Promise<Response> {
  }
}

Hugo•12/3/24, 2:13 PM

Dumb question:

I use the MongoDB Realm SDK to query my db from Workers, as the NodeJS SDK is not supported in Workers runtime.
Realm SDK is now deprecated.
Now what? There is just no way to use MongoDB in a Worker runtime anymore?

SuperHelpflare•12/3/24, 2:27 PM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

Leo•12/3/24, 2:44 PM

I’m really curious about how Workers with Assets try to match static assets first and then route to a worker if they don’t find a match. Is there an internal worker that handles the routing and matching upfront?

LLeo I’m really curious about how Workers with Assets try to match static assets firs...

GuillaumeLakano•12/3/24, 3:10 PM

From what I've understood, you can put a worker in front ( all requests uses the worker ) or without worker. All depend of how you setup your wrangler.toml ( « main = './src/index.js' » )
Then, you define in wrangler the folder of your static assets ( « assets = { directory = "./public/" } » )
But, unfortunately, I don't think there is a way to first try to return a static asset and then run the worker. There is a not_found_handler but only to set a SPA ( fallback to the /index.html ) or to set a 404 page

GGuillaumeLakano From what I've understood, you can put a worker in front ( all requests uses the...

texan•12/3/24, 3:18 PM

Very soon (in the next few hours) you'll be able to do this. You'll be able to indiscriminately run a user worker (even on a path that would have otherwise matched an asset) and dynamically fetch from the assets binding. Then you could do whatever you wanted to the assets (think, HTMLRewriter) in user worker code

import { connect } from 'cloudflare:sockets'; // if keep socket connection here will charge CPU time? const socket = connect(gopherAddr); export default { async fetch(req): Promise<Response> { } }

I'd be interested to see if you could figure out an average CPU MS per invocation in September then

Similar Threads