Anyone got good examples of using wrangler in github actions to create branch PR preview deployments
Anyone got good examples of using wrangler in github actions to create branch PR preview deployments?
Nname: Wrangler deploy
uses: cloudflare/wrangler-action@v3
with:
accountId:
apiToken:
command: 'versions upload'
uses: cloudflare/wrangler-action@v3
with:
accountId:
apiToken:
command: 'versions upload'
Bdidn't see anyone post this, but regression in Wrangler 3.108 causing me grief
https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/8101
https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/8101
GitHub
Which Cloudflare product(s) does this pertain to? Wrangler What versions are you using? 3.108.0 What operating system and version are you using? Mac Sequoia 15.1.1 Please provide a link to a minima...
IIs there a way to disable deployments to the default environment? We only deploy to our named environments (staging and production).
IInteresting thank you!
Dis there any way to stop wrangler deploy from overwriting D1 database bindings, etc? keep-vars does not do it.
YI found a bug in wrangler deploy, where can i report it?
Ythe github issues maybe?
Wgithub issue is best yep
Wwhat's the issue?
YI just reread the docs and saw that deployment of python apps doesn't work, i have a fastapi app, so let me wait
Yhow soon do you think we will get python deployments? in 3 months? do js backends already work?
WSee https://discord.com/channels/595317990191398933/1224715939581530112/1332045636983459851 for Python package support
and yes, js works
and yes, js works
JHi, I've run into an issue for a new project I just started working on, that I've run into before (but the solution I implemented wasn't exactly 'ideal'), and I was wondering if there is an official workaround now. Basically if I'm running a worker locally using
wrangler dev*.example.com), when I try to hit the worker locally (on something like http://something.localhost:8787) the request URL gets rewritten to http://example.com - no matter what the subdomain is. Effectively making it impossible for me to use subdomains locally with
. Is there any way of disabling this functionality locally? I totally get why it's there (for non-wildcard routes) but it causes issues with subdomains.wrangler dev
JAre the wrangler.toml validators exported/published anywhere for third party libraries to use?
JI'm not sure if there's any exposed validators code-wise, but they do publish a
config-schema.json with wrangler
HIIRC too there is some kind of shebang that you can put at the top of the toml file to have it validated. I think it works with the
Even Better TOML extension, but I don’t think it is standardJ#: schema ./node_modules/wrangler/config-schema.json yep 
VIn local dev mode with wrangler, is there a way to run a worker and a durable object.
- worker is the main site
- durable is a websocket server under /path
This setup works find in production, where I can use worker routes. Is there something similar for local dev? (so it looks like both are under localhost:3000 and I can dev like I prod?
HNot entirely sure I understand what you mean? You can just have the Worker forward requests on
/path to your DO?
AI am on v3.109.1 and whenever I try to deploy with wrangler deploy, getting this error:
Why can't I deploy with CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN ? It used to work fine with older version!
You are logged in with an API Token. Unset the CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN in the environment to log in via OAuth.Why can't I deploy with CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN ? It used to work fine with older version!
Mhi team ! How can we handle very sensetive data like crypto wallet keys in backend using workers ? what is the recommended approach?
VOn localhost, where I am developing. I already do that in prod between workers, I need something better on localhost for multiple workers running at the same time
HOh, you meant a DO within one Worker and a separate Worker, on the same port?
H
VIs it possible to connect two workers on localhost through the binding mechanisms? (This subpath stuff is going away eventually, can move that work forward)
HHm… that might work?
VI recall (maybe) that it was not supported yet, but I was a bit early in my journey to hang the details on prior experience. For now, for the feature I'm working on, http fetch is going to be fine, just have to make the websocket host configurable for dev vs prod.
Actually, I did want the websocket worker to share the D1 & KV with the webapp worker. Is this possible in prod & local dev? (prod seems like an easy yes? while dev seems like it may be an issue because they are in different dirs and running in different wrangler setups?
Actually, I did want the websocket worker to share the D1 & KV with the webapp worker. Is this possible in prod & local dev? (prod seems like an easy yes? while dev seems like it may be an issue because they are in different dirs and running in different wrangler setups?
VMaybe using a remote preview environment is the way to handle this in local dev mode?
HYou should be able to point both to the same directory with
—persist-toVI'll give it a try a bit later and report back, would be helpful to expand the wording and examples to cover multi-worker setups on this page: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/local-development/
Cis it possible to deploy a workers without a browser to log in?
VIs there a way to support using wrangler with multiple accounts locally, so I don't have to oauth as a switch between projects I need to deploy?
(hoping that there is a similar answer to @custom's question, i.e. something like an API Key)
(hoping that there is a similar answer to @custom's question, i.e. something like an API Key)
CThat is exactly what I want
VI'm testing it out now
Vfyi, that page is out of date
Vok, got it working, needed ENV vars to be CLOUDFLARE_EMAIL and CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN
ぷI suspect it is a bug in wrangler.
I always get EOF with functions for local environment.
d1-database
When using the wrangler dev command, the server does not start and an EOF error occurs.
I always get EOF with functions for local environment.
d1-database
When using the wrangler dev command, the server does not start and an EOF error occurs.
ぷHono also get EOF for the dev command, but the deploy command is possible and works fine when checked in the browser after deployment.
GHi ! My company have an access to all the CF account of our clients. We have some bash scripts to do some tasks like "npx wrangler deploy". When we create a new project, without yet the node_modules/.mf/ directory, the CLI wrangler will ask us on which account to upload it.
The problem is it's not works inside a bash script ( SystemError [ERR_TTY_INIT_FAILED]: TTY initialization failed: uv_tty_init returned EINVAL )
I've search in the command parameters, I haven't found one to explicit choose the client account. May be there another solution ?
The problem is it's not works inside a bash script ( SystemError [ERR_TTY_INIT_FAILED]: TTY initialization failed: uv_tty_init returned EINVAL )
I've search in the command parameters, I haven't found one to explicit choose the client account. May be there another solution ?
Hhttps://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/wrangler/configuration/#inheritable-keys
This is the ID of the account associated with your zone. You might have more than one account, so make sure to use the ID of the account associated with the zone/route you provide, if you provide one. It can also be specified through theenvironment variable.CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID
GThank you for your help (again!)
But it's not works in the case of « CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID=xxxx npm create cloudflare@latest -- $PROJECT --experimental (...) » and « CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID=xxxx npx create-cloudflare -- $PROJECT --experimental (...) »
I still got the error ╰ ERROR SystemError [ERR_TTY_INIT_FAILED]: TTY initialization failed: uv_tty_init returned EINVAL (invalid argument)
But it's not works in the case of « CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID=xxxx npm create cloudflare@latest -- $PROJECT --experimental (...) » and « CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID=xxxx npx create-cloudflare -- $PROJECT --experimental (...) »
I still got the error ╰ ERROR SystemError [ERR_TTY_INIT_FAILED]: TTY initialization failed: uv_tty_init returned EINVAL (invalid argument)
GI'm using the account id of my client and it's the default static asset configuration created on the fly from create-cloudflare so I doesn't have any control of the config, excepted the CLI parameters or ENV vars
HIt should work for wrangler, but I don’t think c3 works without interactivity
HWhy not just create it once with c3, then push to git
Gfew years ago, before C3, if I remember correctly we could init a project from wrangler directly, I can try that if it's still supported in wrangler
HI believe that uses c3 now too
Gyep I've just read that in the doc ^^
GI'll do it in 2 steps, without automatic deploy, thank you for your help!
