@Kyle Gospo ubuntu's using this in their latest release, don't know what it means for our terminal s
@Kyle Gospo ubuntu's using this in their latest release, don't know what it means for our terminal stuff so just putting it on your radar
KNothing yet until gnome and KDE adopt it
KJust means we'll finally have a standard for changing the default terminal
KGood change, should be little effort from us when it actually lands
JHuh, that's interesting, running the just run-iso from the bluefin repo gives an access denied from docker.io/qemux/qemu-docker
Jrate limited?
Jyou probably need to login
JOh, I don't have a docker contract/ account
JI didn't know we had docker.io in there, maybe we can pull it from somewhere else
JAlso yeah, just signed up with docker, and it's still access restricted. I'm wondering if we all got rate limited
Jare you at work behind a firewall?
JOH
JIt's not called qemu-docker anymore , it looks like
Jnice
Rthey seem to be pushing the same image to
JOr.. maybe something else changed, since that command didn't open the webpage, but instead has it in the terminal
JAh.. it throws it to both terminal AND browser 
JFedora Discussion
Problem In Fedora Atomic Desktops 42, mount options set in /etc/fstab for the following mount points are ignored: root (/) mount point /proc & /sys mount points, if manually specified (they are not created by default) and listed after the entry for the root mount point All other mount points are processed normally. For the default installati...
Awhat version is fwupd currently on f42?
Adid we update our fork?
DView fwupd in the Fedora package repositories. fwupd: Firmware update daemon
D
JGitHub
fwupd is updated to 2.0.7 in F42.
The specfile is quite different. A lot of build options were removed and the dependencies changed a bit. This build on F40 and F41 (at least using the podman build...
The specfile is quite different. A lot of build options were removed and the dependencies changed a bit. This build on F40 and F41 (at least using the podman build...
Agood, legion go s was busted on v1
Ai enabled its updates again
MWhy is this a shell script?
Tim guessing is a reference implementation?
LI've been following that XDG Default Terminal spec for a while now and it looked great last time I checked. Hopefully it gets adopted by the DEs
JFedora Discussion
As of Fedora Rawhide ~2024.01.18, I can’t rebase back to Fedora 41. I don’t have a Fedora 41 deployment to fix that. ❯ journalctl -b -1 -u ostree-finalize-staged.service Jan 21 13:11:15 abc123321bca systemd[1]: Finished ostree-finalize-staged.service - OSTree Finalize Staged Deployment. Jan 21 13:11:37 abc123321bca systemd[1]: Stopping os...
Jso I guess with composefs it means that the upgrade to 42 is a one way trip?
Plooks like it is more related to sbin and bin merge, or is that somehow related to composefs?
JI have another one
Pone way ticket then, i guess?
Joh nevermind it's the same one
Jjust in the bluefin repo
Pyeah is the same one
PI got that link from this issue
Jnod
JI think we should just put guards in the rebase helper
J
JBazzite is soundly defeating Bluefin in the year long statisitcs, though I'm winning in the 30d.
FHere's a good comment I remembered back when I was starting to use Ublue about
https://github.com/ublue-os/main/issues/211#issuecomment-1551600704
xdg-terminal-exechttps://github.com/ublue-os/main/issues/211#issuecomment-1551600704
FBazzite already uses the "better alternative" & it works well
Foh, Bluefin uses it too, so you're all set
R@M2 please could you approve this PR
https://github.com/ublue-os/hwe/pull/326
Enables Nvidia builds for F42
https://github.com/ublue-os/hwe/pull/326
Enables Nvidia builds for F42
GitHub
Adds a build for Fedora 42. I'm not super familiar with the tag lifecycle, but I think I've got them correct. 42 is latest and beta, 41 is stable and 40 is gts.
Mrechunk works inside of a podman unshare environment
Tfancy!
Tman i wish we could use the rpm-ostree rechunker
Acould someone with write access please review/merge this PR? https://github.com/ublue-os/yafti/pull/328
I know yafti is being phased out but secureblue still uses it and this is the last blocker for secureblue's upgrade to F42
I know yafti is being phased out but secureblue still uses it and this is the last blocker for secureblue's upgrade to F42
GitHub
According to the documentation, GBulb is unnecessary and non-functional with recent versions of PyGObject. I removed GBulb, bumped the minimum required version of PyGObject to 3.50.0, and modified ...
ZAbout that, I thought of something really dumb. Can we rechunk, but instead of relying on rpm-ostree, doing it manually with containerfiles
COPY?ANo, you'd need to fork buildah
