is dynamic bindings for D1 coming eventually? I've been working around it for a while but need to st

is dynamic bindings for D1 coming eventually? I've been working around it for a while but need to start to re-think it long term if it's never going to arrive

DDean is dynamic bindings for D1 coming eventually? I've been working around it for a ...

Hard@Work•5/15/25, 12:45 AM

SQLite DOs are kind of dynamic bindings? They have most of the features, minus read replicas, but with scripting next to the DB

HHard@Work SQLite DOs are kind of dynamic bindings? They have most of the features, minus r...

DeanOP•5/15/25, 12:50 AM

i get DO's exist, but i built the platform around D1 with dynamic bindings coming eventually (which is fine). I'm hesitant to change everything from D1 -> DO and then D1 ends up with dynamic binding support and I've wasted my time. Eventually i'd like these databases replicated so I'm sort of in limbo.

Deda•5/15/25, 1:05 AM

is it possible to connect to the d1 trought the node.js app locally, or its only available for the workers?

Chaika•5/15/25, 1:23 AM

?d1-remote-connections

SuperHelpflare•5/15/25, 1:23 AM

Accessing D1 from outside workers:

D1 is based on SQLite, which does not natively support remote connections and isn't MySQL/PostgreSQL wire compatible, nor does D1 itself offer that functionality. As such, your options are:

1 -> The Cloudflare API Query Endpoint (https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/operations/cloudflare-d1-query-database), with the upside of needing less setup, all requests have to go back to Cloudflare's core, so request latency is far from optimal from some locations. You would also be subject to the API Rate limit of 1200 requests per 5 minutes.

2 -> Create a worker to proxy requests to your D1 Database. Either tightly bound to your application/schema or loose and just accepting any query. This would allow your worker to execute potentially closer to your D1 Database and avoid the api rate limit.

Ffrankichiro Hello! What is the correct API request to get the same info as `wrangler d1 info...

Chaika•5/15/25, 8:39 PM

Wrangler is using GraphQL
https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/blob/02d40ed3bbfc9cb4c2f95fb921efd7ec56f141a6/packages/wrangler/src/d1/info.ts#L57

GitHub

workers-sdk/packages/wrangler/src/d1/info.ts at 02d40ed3bbfc9cb4c2f...

Home to Wrangler, the CLI for Cloudflare Workers® - cloudflare/workers-sdk

Chaika•5/15/25, 8:39 PM

can see the exact query there. Wrangler's all open source

aza547•5/16/25, 11:36 AM

I'm seeing spikes of D1 failures periodically when querying my database recently. It doesn't feel like the normal level of background failures you might just retry to avoid. The errors all seem to be one of:

D1_ERROR: D1 DB storage operation exceeded timeout which caused object to be reset

D1_ERROR: D1 DB storage operation exceeded timeout which caused object to be reset

D1_ERROR: Network connection lost.

D1_ERROR: Network connection lost.

D1_ERROR: internal error; reference = 3n7qu7dkdd0atgp7vioes6a5

D1_ERROR: internal error; reference = 3n7qu7dkdd0atgp7vioes6a5

Is anyone able to advise on this? My database ID is

589bafbd-d600-4e01-8879-7443811d45a1

589bafbd-d600-4e01-8879-7443811d45a1

if that's of any use.

garff•5/16/25, 11:39 AM

Hi. I was wondering if it is possible to do transactions using the workers-qb/D1 query bilder? Is there some syntax I do not know about?

Ggarff Hi. I was wondering if it is possible to do transactions using the workers-qb/D1...

gruntlord6•5/17/25, 12:17 AM

Does batch work?

Ggruntlord6 Does batch work?

garff•5/17/25, 11:09 AM

Yea. It greats. Found the right part of the documentation. Thx for replying though!

HHard@Work SQLite DOs are kind of dynamic bindings? They have most of the features, minus r...

DeanOP•5/18/25, 3:35 PM

Looking into durable objects more today - they need to be binded to a worker which is the same problem I have with d1.

DDean Looking into durable objects more today - they need to be binded to a worker whi...

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/18/25, 4:15 PM

Sort of? You bind a DO namespace to your Worker once, but from that namespace, you pass an ID and get as many DOs as you want

Hello, I’m Allie!•5/18/25, 4:15 PM

One Namespace -> Many “Databases”

gruntlord6•5/19/25, 12:28 AM

yup, you can have a lot of individual objects in a single namespace

gruntlord6•5/19/25, 12:28 AM

for example, an object for every customer

gruntlord6•5/19/25, 12:29 AM

where as with D1 you need a binding for every db

planet•5/19/25, 1:52 AM

Does a primary get replicated to multiple replicas, or just a single replica per region?

e.g. does a WNAM primary gets replicated to a single ENAM location, or multiple ENAM locations?

Pplanet Does a primary get replicated to multiple replicas, or just a single replica per...

Chaika•5/19/25, 2:02 AM

currently just one replica per region, including the primary region

Rripes Bumping this. Any pointers on importing an existing sqlite db that already has a...

Max (@rozenmd)•5/19/25, 8:18 AM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/d1/best-practices/import-export-data/#known-limitations

Disciple of Caoximeihao•5/19/25, 9:16 AM

Is there a way to export the database but still have it read and write normally in production?

Disciple of Caoximeihao•5/19/25, 9:16 AM

Is there a way to export the database but still have it read and write normally in production?

xeon06•5/19/25, 3:43 PM

Is there anyone working on a D1 client for workers with built-in retry, to try and circumvent these issues? https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-docs/issues/18485

xeon06•5/19/25, 3:56 PM

I suppose it isn't that simple to enforce idempotency

.ul0gic•5/19/25, 6:46 PM

anyone here familiar or have experience in getting local D1 instances to maintain persistence during local development by chance?

.ul0gic•5/19/25, 7:35 PM

Fixing D1 Local Persistence with Wrangler Pages Dev

Issue

Local D1 persistence with

wrangler pages dev

wrangler pages dev

may not work as expected, even when

preview_database_id

preview_database_id

is set in

wrangler.toml

wrangler.toml

and

--persist-to

--persist-to

is used in the

dev

dev

script. Runtime operations (e.g., API calls creating new data) might connect to a new, blank D1 instance instead of the schema-initialized, persisted one. This leads to "no such table" errors and data loss between development server restarts.

message.txt2.15KB

.ul0gic•5/19/25, 7:37 PM

sorry if that breaks the rules....ive seen a few people ask about this and have this same issue. took multiple days and finally figured it out. hope it helps someone else here struggling with this.

DDean i get DO's exist, but i built the platform around D1 with dynamic bindings comin...

lambrospetrou•5/20/25, 7:39 AM

D1 dynamic bindings are not coming in the short-term, and still undecided for long-term. If you want to programmatically create thousands of databases, SQLite Durable Objects are already available and they are the exact same SQLite components under the hood.

Llambrospetrou D1 dynamic bindings are not coming in the short-term, and still undecided for lo...

DeanOP•5/20/25, 7:44 AM

It’s a shame that really wasn’t communicated at the start. I’ll have to rewrite everything which is a shame.

DDean It’s a shame that really wasn’t communicated at the start. I’ll have to rewrite ...

lambrospetrou•5/20/25, 9:00 AM

At the start, SQLite DOs didn't exist

Ashish Rawat•5/20/25, 9:42 AM

Durable object is too much boilerplate.

planet•5/20/25, 2:18 PM

meh it only took less than a week to learn how to use SQLite in DO and refactor code

planet•5/20/25, 2:18 PM

you get input gates & (in my testing) much better latencies & less reads/writes because you dont need to index a user id

Ashish Rawat•5/20/25, 2:51 PM

problem is you can't query across multiple database for getting list of users, do joins and so on. So you've to use D1 for that with different concept. Cloudflare database (D1, DO) is broken. D1 has different limitation while DO has different. So basically to make everything work, you need to use both D1, DO and Queues. So instead of this, I better off go with managed postgres.

AAshish Rawat problem is you can't query across multiple database for getting list of users, d...

lambrospetrou•5/20/25, 3:47 PM

So you've to use D1 for that with different concept. Cloudflare database (D1, DO) is broken. D1 has different limitation while DO has different

I wonder why you say this. Actually, D1 has exactly the same limitations as a single Durable Object, and even more since your worker code is remotely from the actual storage and you don't have things like transactions across queries interleaved with JS code, whereas in the DO case your code runs next to the storage and is fast. Resource limits wise, a D1 database IS a single Durable Object, so zero differences.

I assume your different viewpoint is if you design your DO architecture using per-resource/per-tenant DO vs a single D1 database, but then you are not comparing the same thing since managing multiple D1 databases in the same way would be much more complicated.

planet•5/20/25, 8:35 PM

Much less of a problem and more of a design consideration.

Personally I use D1 as a lightweight directory DBs that handles background cleanups/etc (via CRON) and login lookups. emails/sso metadata matches get logged into their SQLite in DO DB.

You also have Alarms which is part of Durable Objects (so you don't necessarily need Queues/Workflows)
You can also set up basic rate limiting in memory using

this

this

in each new constructor instance

planet•5/20/25, 8:37 PM

Now I do wish my R2 bucket had spawned in the same DC as my DO... praying for finer grained location hints one day

workerBee•5/20/25, 9:13 PM

Is it possible to debug these platform errors?

D1_ERROR: D1 DB storage operation exceeded timeout which caused object to be reset.

D1_ERROR: D1 DB storage operation exceeded timeout which caused object to be reset.

.... Or just accept and move on?

Llambrospetrou D1 dynamic bindings are not coming in the short-term, and still undecided for lo...

ac•5/21/25, 12:43 AM

This is definitely different from the messaging that I've heard from other Cloudflare folks recently, I was definitely hoping for dynamic bindings for D1 as well. It's a bit disappointing how unclear this all is.

SQLite in DO's is a nice idea, but it's fairly unusable right now when you can't actually view DO instances and cannot view what is in the databases....

Aac This is definitely different from the messaging that I've heard from other Cloud...

1984 Ford Laser•5/21/25, 5:50 AM

There are absolutely ways to view the instances and view what's in the databases. Unsure where that idea comes from exactly

Aac This is definitely different from the messaging that I've heard from other Cloud...

lambrospetrou•5/21/25, 6:15 AM

This is definitely different from the messaging that I've heard from other Cloudflare folks recently

I have been in this channel for 9 months now and we never gave an ETA for dynamic bindings. It was (and still is) one of the future possible features. But, I don't want folks to start designing their new applications now depending on a feature that does not yet exist and is not going to land within say the next quarter. That's my viewpoint.

SQLite in DO's is a nice idea, but it's fairly unusable right now when you can't actually view DO instances and cannot view what is in the databases....

You cannot (yet) view them natively in the Cloudflare dashboard but there are several open source solutions to inspect your Durable Objects. For example, you could use something like https://github.com/outerbase/browsable-durable-object
I agree that DOs don't (yet) have some of the niceties of D1 like import/export but you get the flexibility of creating as many as you want much easier than with D1. So, it's about tradeoffs and what you need right this moment.

Aac This is definitely different from the messaging that I've heard from other Cloud...

DeanOP•5/21/25, 7:01 AM

Yeah it truly sucks. I have workarounds for it and looking at using durable objects but think I’ll end up just using another database provider that’ll allow me to do everything d1 does but have a database for each user,

Ashish Rawat•5/21/25, 8:02 AM

Well that proves the point, neither D1 nor DO solves the basic problems completely. Why would we should use 10 different things when all can be done with postgres and postgres doesn't have 10 GB limitation.
Also this is not just the problem with DO or D1, even workers doesn't have many limitations, basically all the development products of cloudflare are just WIP and not ready for production usage completely.

AAshish Rawat Well that proves the point, neither D1 nor DO solves the basic problems complete...

lambrospetrou•5/21/25, 8:50 AM

If Postgres solves your needs, then using Workers + Hyperdrive is a perfectly fine combination. There is no need to shoehorn your architecture into the D1/DO model.

is dynamic bindings for D1 coming eventually? I've been working around it for a while but need to st

Issue

Similar Threads

Issue