Cloudflare Developers•8mo ago

Yeah, I think I'll go with the manual snippet instalation. Or I'll just convert this project back in

Yeah, I think I'll go with the manual snippet instalation. Or I'll just convert this project back into a Pages project

AngiusOP•5/19/25, 2:26 AM

Only went with Workers because I wanted to run some stuff on a CRON trigger and Pages functions have no support for it

AngiusOP•5/19/25, 2:26 AM

But I can live without that

AAngius Yeah, I think I'll go with the manual snippet instalation. Or I'll just convert ...

Chaika•5/19/25, 2:27 AM

Maybe worth noting eventually everything will converge into Workers, Workers should support most of the Pages features by then tho

Chaika•5/19/25, 2:27 AM

?pages

SuperHelpflare•5/19/25, 2:27 AM

As announced during Developer Week, Cloudflare recommends all new projects use Workers Assets. Cloudflare Pages will continue to be supported, but, going forward, all of our investment, optimizations, and feature work will be dedicated to improving Workers. If there is something missing that you think Workers needs, please send it in #workers-and-pages-feature-suggestions

AngiusOP•5/19/25, 2:28 AM

Well, doesn't have feature parity regarding analytics setup, that's for sure

Chaika•5/19/25, 2:29 AM

yea still missing a fair few things right now like drag and drop/easier creation w/o config, etc

AngiusOP•5/19/25, 2:30 AM

And now neither shows the visit I did from a browser without any adblocking :KEKW:

AngiusOP•5/19/25, 2:30 AM

Aight, maybe organic traffic will be visible

AngiusOP•5/19/25, 2:31 AM

I'll just wait

AAngius And now neither shows the visit I did from a browser without any adblocking :KEK...

Chaika•5/19/25, 2:31 AM

it's at least a few mins delayed

Chaika•5/19/25, 2:32 AM

you can see in your dev tools if it made the call to rum

Chaika•5/19/25, 2:33 AM

under network utils, path is

/cdn-cgi/rum

/cdn-cgi/rum

, you can see the site token there too, if it matches your snippet or not (the

token

token

part of it)

AngiusOP•5/19/25, 2:34 AM

Yeah

sultan.xh•5/19/25, 10:35 AM

You have reached the soft limit for the number of projects on your account. Please contact support to create more projects.

Getting this. Can anyone from support help me here?

sultan.xh•5/19/25, 10:39 AM

I have already upgraded to the Pro plan, but there is still no limit change.

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 8:08 PM

Hi all, I’m encountering an issue with Cloudflare Pages related to CORS. We use the same middleware to handle CORS across our routes, but some endpoints suddenly started having cross-origin request errors while others work fine. For example:

POST /api/login works without any problems

GET /api/userinfo returns CORS errors

There haven’t been any changes to the code, yet many requests are now failing due to CORS issues. Has anyone else experienced this or can admins help clarify what might be going on? Thanks in advance!

Xxiaolong01 Hi all, I’m encountering an issue with Cloudflare Pages related to CORS. We use ...

Isaac McFadyen•5/19/25, 8:22 PM

?crossposting

SuperHelpflare•5/19/25, 8:22 PM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

IIsaac McFadyen ?crossposting

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 8:25 PM

Yeah, I posted in another channel too since I wasn’t sure which one was the right place to ask. Sorry about that — just trying to get to the bottom of this CORS issue on Pages. Won’t spam further!

IIsaac McFadyen ?crossposting

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 8:27 PM

Just wondering — is it possible that Cloudflare Pages recently rolled out any changes related to CORS or edge behavior? I didn’t see anything on the status page, but we’re seeing CORS issues on routes that used to work fine without any code changes. Would really appreciate any insights, thanks!

Xxiaolong01 Hi all, I’m encountering an issue with Cloudflare Pages related to CORS. We use ...

Chaika•5/19/25, 8:40 PM

What's the response code/headers? Is it possible it's a waf block or something else?

Xxiaolong01 Just wondering — is it possible that Cloudflare Pages recently rolled out any ch...

Chaika•5/19/25, 8:41 PM

All future updates are going to Workers and Workers Static Assets instead of Pages, Pages is pretty much only in light maintenance mode

CChaika What's the response code/headers? Is it possible it's a waf block or something e...

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 8:57 PM

Thanks for the follow-up! I just checked again — for the failing request, the browser console only shows a "CORS error" with no actual status code returned. It seems the request was blocked at the browser level, likely due to missing CORS headers. So I can't see whether it's a 403 or something else from the server.

This behavior is inconsistent across routes, which all go through the same CORS middleware on our side. That’s why I’m wondering if Cloudflare Pages might be treating certain paths differently or applying stricter rules (maybe WAF or edge caching changes?).

Xxiaolong01 Thanks for the follow-up! I just checked again — for the failing request, the br...

Chaika•5/19/25, 8:57 PM

You should be able to see in network utils more info about the request, in all browsers, I think

Chaika•5/19/25, 8:58 PM

but it looks like this isn't a Pages thing but part of a wider new cdn platform rollout, issues with CORS errors being stripped, other community members already escalated

CChaika You should be able to see in network utils more info about the request, in all b...

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 9:04 PM

I did a capture using Charles, and I can confirm the OPTIONS request returns 200, but the response body looks like corrupted or binary content (not a valid CORS response). Seems like a CDN-level issue, as you mentioned.

Xxiaolong01 I did a capture using Charles, and I can confirm the OPTIONS request returns 200...

Isaac McFadyen•5/19/25, 9:05 PM

Yup, it's been escalated internally

Isaac McFadyen•5/19/25, 9:05 PM

Thank you for reporting.

IIsaac McFadyen Yup, it's been escalated internally 😄

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 9:13 PM

Thanks again for confirming it’s been escalated!

Just wondering — is there any rough ETA on when this issue might be resolved, or at least stabilized? We’re seeing quite a few production requests fail due to this, so trying to plan whether we should wait or implement a temporary workaround with Workers.

Appreciate any insight!

Xxiaolong01 Thanks again for confirming it’s been escalated! 🙏 Just wondering — is there an...

Isaac McFadyen•5/19/25, 9:14 PM

No idea about a time-to-resolution but eyes are on it internally and it's being investigated.

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 9:18 PM

If we migrate to Workers, will the same issue occur? Currently, we have a relatively high number of failures. If Workers don’t have this problem, we can migrate part of the workload there first. If the issue still exists on Workers, then we can consider other solutions.

Xxiaolong01 If we migrate to Workers, will the same issue occur? Currently, we have a relati...

Chaika•5/19/25, 9:19 PM

no, it's cdn level so it effects any origin

Chaika•5/19/25, 9:19 PM

it's a wider issue though, like ~30 reports on the forums, shouldn't be too much longer til it's fixed.
You could try using Transform rules add response headers to add the cors headers, not sure if that gets around it, haven't tried

CChaika it's a wider issue though, like ~30 reports on the forums, shouldn't be too much...

xiaolong01•5/19/25, 9:23 PM

Okay, thank you for your answer.

Xxiaolong01 Thanks again for confirming it’s been escalated! 🙏 Just wondering — is there an...

Peps•5/19/25, 9:44 PM

https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/incidents/nr3qlpp9xbfd

cc @l422y

A fix has started to roll out so you should be seeing a improvement

CORS Headers Set Incorrectly For Certain Free Zones

epuerta•5/19/25, 9:59 PM

quick question

if i have a nextjs on workers with opennextjs and also a workers entrypoint for agents

do service bindings work on the nextjs side? I've been getting errors where it fails to pick up the service bindings unless Its part of my hono backend where the agents are defined

I merged my frontend and backend in one workers project to avoid having that split and use service bindings like agents on the nextjs side

Tusike•5/19/25, 10:30 PM

Hi!

I'm working an a tutorial app and have been looking for a solution to host probably a maximum of around 1000-2000 video clips and serve them on a website. The videos are usually 10-20s long so can easily fit within ~5-10MB. I've been looking into R2 to avoid egress fees, but had difficulties figuring out how to do it securely so that someone can't just call my worker to request videos millions of times (since even if I add some authentication to the worker to avoid R2 requests, the worker invocation still incurs fees I think).

Then I ran across static assets. Am I missing anything or are these really the perfect solution for my use-case? The limits are 20k files and 25MiB individual size, which are above my requirements. And then the help page says there are never any request limits, so I'm totally safe and this remains free even if I expose the worker to a public URL? How does cloudflare know that my worker is returning a static asset and I shouldn't be charged (e.g. can the worker also do extra logic to determine whether to send the requested video or not)?

TTusike Hi! I'm working an a tutorial app and have been looking for a solution to host ...

Chaika•5/20/25, 1:04 AM

Static assets are meant for websites/html, not video.

I've been looking into R2 to avoid egress fees, but had difficulties figuring out how to do it securely so that someone can't just call my worker to request videos millions of times

If you use an R2 Custom Domain and force cache, you don't pay for any cache hits, so calling the same video a lot = free to you

Tusike•5/20/25, 1:05 AM

I don't see anything preventing me from hosting my entire website with the videos included as assets as a static website though. I tested it out and wrangler dev worked fine.

Original message was deleted

Chaika•5/20/25, 1:06 AM

Not with Cloudflare Pages without adding your own worker running in front of all requests, but you can with Static Assets and html handling: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/static-assets/routing/advanced/html-handling/

Cloudflare Docs

HTML handling

How to configure a HTML handling and trailing slashes for the static assets of your Worker.

TTusike I don't see anything preventing me from hosting my entire website with the video...

Chaika•5/20/25, 1:10 AM

It's relatively clearly outlined against the ToS for Pages which does the same thing, and It could be interpted a against the ToS for Static Assets since it's not one of the products listed as usable to serve non-Html Content
https://www.cloudflare.com/service-specific-terms-developer-platform/#developer-platform-terms
* not a lawyer, not legal advice, the team has clarified before though it's very much not chill to use Pages that way, and Static Assets isn't any different in the way it works
R2 is the product intended to be used that way, Static Assets is for websites

Original message was deleted

Chaika•5/20/25, 1:13 AM

Pages Functions are basically a Syntactic sugar layer on top of Workers, where wrangler compiled them into a single file and handled routing for it. You'd just do the same logic inside of a worker directly, and static assets are automatically picked where the path matches the asset (effectively...)

CChaika It's relatively clearly outlined against the ToS for Pages which does the same t...

Tusike•5/20/25, 1:15 AM

So I was missing something.. :/ it sounded too good to be true

I wish the limitation was mentioned on the static assets help page, to me it really feels that a video can be a static asset to a website and then R2 is for more dynamic things e.g. having users upload their videos.

Tusike•5/20/25, 1:16 AM

I'm also not a lawyer so it's not clear to me which part of the terms of service applies

TTusike So I was missing something.. :/ it sounded too good to be true 😅 I wish the li...

Chaika•5/20/25, 1:18 AM

I mean if they're embedded in the website/only viewable through the website, and you're not serving them externally as part of other apps/etc (as a file locker, effectively), then you're more in the gray
Cloudflare uses words like "disproportionate percentage of pictures, audio files, or other large files", and the reality is they're not going to care until/unless your usage becomes enough to care about, but gets iffy
https://blog.cloudflare.com/updated-tos/ outlines some of it
Generally before the pages team and such gave guidance like "if they're big images but part of a portfolio web page (and not being mass downloaded as part of an external tool/cdn/etc), then it's being used for a web page/website/images on your site and fine" but that was before some of these ToS changes as well, eh

Tusike•5/20/25, 1:23 AM

~~I don't know what I'm missing but I can't find that wording in the ToS pages or the other website you linked, the first I read manually and in both I tried CTRL-F~~ nevermind I found the right page
But I understand it might not be the intended use

Tusike•5/20/25, 1:23 AM

R2 still makes me worried of messing something up and waking up to a huge bill, that's why I was excited for these static assets

Tusike•5/20/25, 1:25 AM

Based on the help pages, it even seemed that I can use a worker to serve the files anywhere (the worker can just return a static asset, it doesn't have to be a website even), as a returned result, e.g. not just for a website but also a mobile app

TTusike R2 still makes me worried of messing something up and waking up to a huge bill, ...

Isaac McFadyen•5/20/25, 1:49 AM

There's been many employees here as well as a public blog post clarifying that R2 is perfectly OK to serve large content like videos/images.

Yeah, I think I'll go with the manual snippet instalation. Or I'll just convert this project back in

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads