Ei rxn

1. why doesnt Ei rxn take place 2. why does phenyl shift take place instead of methyl
No description
12 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP4mo ago
My thinking for Ei rxn
No description
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP4mo ago
If E1 takes place
No description
Opt
Opt4mo ago
I haven't studied Ei, but I'm pretty sure that OTs has enough nucleofugacity that it'll just leave as soon as heat is provided, leaving a carbocation. Since that will be the RDS, any side reactions are not so prominent in the reaction. Secondly, maybe instead of a phenyl shift, it's possibly a nucleophilic attack from one of the benzene double bonds followed by bond shift from the unmarked carbon? I think that'll proceed faster than a migration, so it might predominate. Again, not certain
Imine
Imine4mo ago
I think e1 is giving the correct product Oh c isn't the correct ans?
Real potato
Real potato4mo ago
The phenyl shift approach will give correct ans Also phenyl has greater migration aptitude
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP4mo ago
The Ei explanation might be correct It is It does but isn't greater carbocation stability more important
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP4mo ago
Here too migratory aptitude is given preference over product stability
No description
Real potato
Real potato4mo ago
See it doesnt work like that Migration uska hota hai jiski electron donating capacity zyada ho
CorrodedCoffin
CorrodedCoffinOP4mo ago
+solved @Real potato @Opt
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@741159941934415883> (741159941934415883)
Time
<t:1748106276:R>
Solved by
<@1088352651567173632> (1088352651567173632), <@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892)

Did you find this page helpful?