it's very awkward running locally, because the flow goes: - edit user code & run but the APIs to c

it's very awkward running locally, because the flow goes:

edit user code & run

but the APIs to create/edit users-workers seem to not have a local equivalent. so there's no (simple) way to save and test a change, which is pretty fundamental WFP interaction? Also makes it very hard to test the combined code when we add platform stuff to user-stuff

if there's a way to just run the production worker from local that would be one solution I think. interested how anyone else gets around this or what I'm missing

Ddangelo Does Workers for Platforms work with Durable Objects? I didn't see that mentione...

christianklotz•6/6/25, 8:35 AM

workers-for-platforms yesterday

demotimeOP•6/6/25, 9:43 AM

i guess i could deploy a proxy dispatch worker, then abstract a proxyOrRun method, if env.proxyDispatchUrl is set go via. that. anyone happen to know any best practice or workflow which would let us deploy and test scripts locally (local env, local dispatch worker, scripts either locally emulated or production ones)

Ddemotime does anyone know whether we can run user-workers with a regular http url/api, or...

darkpool•6/6/25, 1:51 PM

no public url. pretty sure dispatch is only option.

Ddemotime it's very awkward running locally, because the flow goes: - edit user code & ru...

darkpool•6/6/25, 1:54 PM

maybe im not understanding but in my case I simulate local dev with treating the user code as a module and importing it before wrapping my own platform code around it to "hydrate" it. Also you can run dispatch locally with --remote to test deployed user workers

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 5:18 PM

In the call accounts/{account_id}/workers/ dispatch/namespaces/ {dispatch_namespace}/scripts/ {script_name}

Is there a way to also bind the domain? Or must that be a seperate call

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 5:18 PM

~~Currently I can create the worker programmatically but I cannot figure out how to bind a domain~~
Resolved by just properly using a dispatch worker

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 5:18 PM

And it doesn't even have a default workers.dev domain

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 6:35 PM

if not, is there a "workers for platforms" equivilant of https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/resources/workers/subresources/domains/methods/update/

Cloudflare API | Workers › Domains › Attach To Domain

Interact with Cloudflare's products and services via the Cloudflare API

Rafflesia•6/6/25, 9:12 PM

for included monthly, when it says 1000 scripts included, is that 1000 new scripts per month or is that 1000 scripts total

yinxingmaiming6409•6/7/25, 7:02 AM

Is there a frequency limit if workers are used to operate r2 or vector?

Zuch•6/12/25, 2:50 PM

Everyone, I'm going bankrupt. My bill last month included a charge of $2,581.76 for Workers for Platform Scripts. The bill shows a quantity of 129,088 workers, a unit price of $0.02, and a total price of $2,581.76.

However, when I look at the console, I only have 4,628 workers. So, does anyone know how the 129,088 is calculated?

ZZuch Everyone, I'm going bankrupt. My bill last month included a charge of $2,581.76 ...

Walshy•6/12/25, 3:42 PM

Hey can you /link so I can grab your details and have people look into this?

Walshy•6/12/25, 3:42 PM

?link

SuperHelpflare•6/12/25, 3:42 PM

Please use the /link command to authenticate with your Cloudflare account and link it to your Discord user. This helps Cloudflare employees access your details more quickly and provide support. It also makes future support requests easier, since your account will already be linked.

WWalshy ?link

Zuch•6/12/25, 3:45 PM

done

Zuch•6/12/25, 3:57 PM

Also, the documentation does not indicate whether worker scripts are a one-time payment or a monthly payment.

Walshy•6/12/25, 4:01 PM

We're looking into it, thank you

As for the frequency, yeah it'd be monthly, we'd encourage making sure to cleanup any unused scripts to make sure you're only billed for what you're actively using

Successful-Arm-3762•6/12/25, 9:28 PM

Is the correct (only?) way to have 1 DB/Tenant D1 architecture through workers for platforms using service bindings?

WWalshy We're looking into it, thank you As for the frequency, yeah it'd be monthly, w...

Zuch•6/13/25, 6:37 AM

Hi Walshy, how is it going?

ZZuch Hi Walshy, how is it going?

Walshy•6/13/25, 3:00 PM

Should have a reply to your ticket shortly, working on getting you sorted :)

Rafflesia•6/16/25, 9:20 PM

Is there an API to grab realtime logs for workers?

ZZuch Everyone, I'm going bankrupt. My bill last month included a charge of $2,581.76 ...

Rafflesia•6/16/25, 9:25 PM

Wow! This seems quite concerning I hope CF has a good answer for this. I've been wondering if it's the amount of workers that exist in a month or how workers that exist for one day and are deleted the next are billed

WWalshy Should have a reply to your ticket shortly, working on getting you sorted :)

Zuch•6/17/25, 7:58 AM

there's still no news.

RRafflesia Wow! This seems quite concerning I hope CF has a good answer for this. I've been...

Zuch•6/17/25, 7:59 AM

Yes, CF does not specify how to calculate the number of worker scripts.

laurynas•6/17/25, 2:32 PM

are there plans for a better local dev experience? Would love to be able to test some flows without needing a deploy

RRafflesia Is there an API to grab realtime logs for workers?

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:41 PM

bumping this

RRafflesia bumping this

Hard@Work•6/17/25, 9:42 PM

This should work? https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/resources/workers/subresources/scripts/subresources/tail/

Cloudflare API | Workers › Scripts › Tail

Interact with Cloudflare's products and services via the Cloudflare API

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:42 PM

I see this for regular workers https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/resources/workers/subresources/scripts/subresources/tail/methods/create/

Cloudflare API | Workers › Scripts › Tail › Start Tail

Interact with Cloudflare's products and services via the Cloudflare API

HHard@Work This should work? https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/resources/workers/subres...

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:42 PM

but I dont see that for workers for platforms

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:43 PM

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:43 PM

I'm not sure if I can just put the dispatch namespace in the URL and if it will just work

RRafflesia but I dont see that for workers for platforms

Hard@Work•6/17/25, 9:45 PM

If you initiate a tail for your Dispatch Worker, it should show logs for WfP Scripts

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:45 PM

alright, I was mostly just checking that I wouldn't need to make a tail worker instead

HHard@Work If you initiate a tail for your Dispatch Worker, it should show logs for WfP Scr...

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:46 PM

oh its in the dispatch worker logs?

RRafflesia oh its in the dispatch worker logs?

Hard@Work•6/17/25, 9:46 PM

It should be.

RRafflesia alright, I was mostly just checking that I wouldn't need to make a tail worker i...

Hard@Work•6/17/25, 9:47 PM

Tail Workers are best for persistent connections, where you are writing your logs to some third system

HHard@Work Tail Workers are best for persistent connections, where you are writing your log...

Rafflesia•6/17/25, 9:48 PM

sounds like me, I'll look into this then

Successful-Arm-3762•6/21/25, 12:59 AM

Hi everyone,

I'm trying to understand the binding capabilities in Workers for Platforms user workers (not the dispatch worker). Specifically:

Service Bindings: Can user workers have service bindings configured when they're uploaded to a dispatch namespace? The docs mention that service bindings "don't work in the Workers for Platforms model because User Workers are uploaded ad hoc" but it's not entirely clear if this means user workers can't have ANY service bindings or is this forbidding the use of Service Bindings as a replacement for the WfP dispatch mechanism itself?

I found this in the docs: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/bindings/service-bindings/#workers-for-platforms but it's not completely clear on the scope of the limitation.

Service binding documentation says that binded service worker must be deployed before the one that declares the binding. So if I have the service worker deployed would they be accessible from the namespace/user-workers called by the dispatch worker? https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/bindings/service-bindings/#deployment

I assume that workers for platforms keep talking about customer user code and since it is "namespace" bound, they might not be available, but this programmable pattern tells me other common resources are available:

https://developers.cloudflare.com/reference-architecture/diagrams/serverless/programmable-platforms/#resource-isolation-model

Workflows: Are Workflow bindings available in user workers? I couldn't find specific documentation about this.
request.cf: If the cf object always unavailable in WfP?

Does anyone have any definitive info on this? Thanks!

Walshy•6/21/25, 9:06 AM

Service Bindings: Can user workers have service bindings configured when they're uploaded to a dispatch namespace? The docs mention that service bindings "don't work in the Workers for Platforms model because User Workers are uploaded ad hoc" but it's not entirely clear if this means user workers can't have ANY service bindings or is this forbidding the use of Service Bindings as a replacement for the WfP dispatch mechanism itself?

They can have service bindings but they must bind to non-wfp-workers

Workflows: Are Workflow bindings available in user workers? I couldn't find specific documentation about this.

Workers and WfP is currently incompatible

request.cf: If the cf object always unavailable in WfP?

It's available

WWalshy > Service Bindings: Can user workers have service bindings configured when they'...

Successful-Arm-3762•6/21/25, 4:47 PM

Thanks Walshy!
Just a small follow up: workflow will still be available on the non-wfp-workers and the dispatch worker?

Walshy•6/21/25, 4:50 PM

Yes you could use it on the dispatcher

rob•6/21/25, 6:01 PM

does thsat new worker upload on the SDK released work for WFP?

WWalshy Yes you could use it on the dispatcher

Successful-Arm-3762•6/21/25, 10:56 PM

thanks mate!

Successful-Arm-3762•6/23/25, 3:50 AM

is it possible to deploy a shared/common worker, and use WfP to create user workers using that script with different bindings? and any updates/new deployments made to that common worker picked up by the user workers?

SSuccessful-Arm-3762 is it possible to deploy a shared/common worker, and use WfP to create user work...

Successful-Arm-3762•6/23/25, 4:13 AM

I think this is not possible. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Does anyone else have better patterns for creating workers with tenant specific bindings?

SSuccessful-Arm-3762 is it possible to deploy a shared/common worker, and use WfP to create user work...

Successful-Arm-3762•6/23/25, 4:25 AM

On another note: I think if this is just made available, it would be a great way to deploy custom binded workers that update on just one wrangler deploy. This solves the dynamic D1 bindings not available problem.

The model would stay the same as depicted here in the docs: https://developers.cloudflare.com/reference-architecture/diagrams/serverless/programmable-platforms/#resource-isolation-model

Cloudflare Docs

Programmable Platforms

A programmable platform allows customers to customize a product by writing code. Unlike traditional SaaS with fixed features, it enables users to extend functionality, deploy backend logic, and build full-stack experiences—all within the platform’s infrastructure.

Original message was deleted

Isaac McFadyen•6/24/25, 8:21 PM

Yes, maximum 1000 per docs here: https://developers.cloudflare.com/kv/platform/limits/

Isaac McFadyen•6/24/25, 8:21 PM

Specifically the "namespaces" limit.

Isaac McFadyen•6/24/25, 8:21 PM

Ah sorry - missed that this was for WfP. Not sure if the limit is the same or not for KV.

it's very awkward running locally, because the flow goes: - edit user code & run but the APIs to c

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads