When i try to publish a workflow with workers i get this error: Token Permissions: If scopes are mis

When i try to publish a workflow with workers i get this error: Token Permissions: If scopes are missing, you may need to logout and re-login.

Jehu•6/7/25, 2:55 PM

Does anyone have a workaround for testing workflows. See ticket below. Any help is much appreciated.

https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-sdk/issues/7414

GitHub

🐛 BUG: Vitest does not work with workflows · Issue #7414 · clo...

Which Cloudflare product(s) does this pertain to? Miniflare, Other What version(s) of the tool(s) are you using? 0.5.32 [@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers], 3.91.0 [wrangler] What version of Node are...

OOreki When i try to publish a workflow with workers i get this error: Token Permission...

koraytaylan•6/8/25, 12:53 PM

this also happens to me time to time. retrying a couple more times self-corrects the issue. no need to mention i am certain that the token i use has all the necessary scopes to begin with in my case.

RRapid Lets say I have 5 workers that each one has a different job and I want to run th...

Rapid•6/8/25, 1:53 PM

Anyone?

Kkoraytaylan this also happens to me time to time. retrying a couple more times self-corrects...

OrekiOP•6/8/25, 3:17 PM

Yeah quite amazing, you just have to run the command multiple times and hope it works this time lol

RRapid Lets say I have 5 workers that each one has a different job and I want to run th...

koraytaylan•6/8/25, 7:04 PM

workflow steps are already dynamically runnable. so, at runtime, you can pick and chose which step should come next based on the workflow params or even by individual step outputs.

JJehu Does anyone have a workaround for testing workflows. See ticket below. Any help ...

koraytaylan•6/8/25, 7:08 PM

i did not really like the way that vitest plugin worked so i sticked with jest by sacrificing some functionality. i try to mock everything and try not to rely on anything but the logic i am testing so it makes sense to go this way in my case.

Kkoraytaylan workflow steps are already dynamically runnable. so, at runtime, you can pick an...

Rapid•6/9/25, 1:32 PM

Can you maybe guide me through that? Like link me something that explains on how to do it

sheffield•6/9/25, 9:52 PM

i randomly started getting this error when trying to create a workflow batch. it's been working fine up until now, but not sure where to go from here:

Converting circular structure to JSON
    --> starting at object with constructor 'PgTable'
    |     property 'id' -> object with constructor 'PgUUID'
    --- property 'table' closes the circle

Converting circular structure to JSON
    --> starting at object with constructor 'PgTable'
    |     property 'id' -> object with constructor 'PgUUID'
    --- property 'table' closes the circle

the params i'm passing to my workflow create batch don't contain the tabletable property anywhere, and i've verified the types are correct. it works fine locally—any ideas on how to root cause this?

sheffield•6/9/25, 10:05 PM

nevermind, fixed the issue—one of the parameters i was passing wasn't serializable

Nimesh•6/9/25, 11:39 PM

Hi, we am using both workflows and queues in our application. We noticed that workflows requires isolatedStorageisolatedStorage flag to be set to

false

false

(otherwise, vitest doesn't recognize the entrypoint?). However, since setting isolatedStorageisolatedStorage to

false

false

, we see a different error related to queues.

QueuesError [ERR_MULTIPLE_CONSUMERS]: Multiple consumers defined for queue "<queue-name>"

QueuesError [ERR_MULTIPLE_CONSUMERS]: Multiple consumers defined for queue "<queue-name>"

Any idea how we can solve this?

lent20254•6/10/25, 2:01 PM

I deleted a User API Key but it is still working.

lent20254•6/10/25, 2:01 PM

Surely this isnt expected?

lent20254•6/10/25, 2:04 PM

Is there a way to get comeone from CF to help?

lent20254•6/10/25, 2:45 PM

@avenceslau I can confirm the key works but see no keys in the UI

lent20254•6/10/25, 2:50 PM

Checking with this script I dont see any tokens in either:

Common headers

headers = {
"X-Auth-Email": CF_EMAIL,
"X-Auth-Key": CF_API_KEY,
"Content-Type": "application/json",
}

── 1. List all user-level API tokens ──

user_tokens_url = "https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/user/tokens"
resp = requests.get(user_tokens_url, headers=headers)
print("User-level tokens response:")
print(json.dumps(resp.json(), indent=2))

── 2. List all account-level API tokens ──

account_tokens_url = f"https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/{CF_ACCOUNT_ID}/tokens"
resp = requests.get(account_tokens_url, headers=headers)
print("\nAccount-level tokens response:")
print(json.dumps(resp.json(), indent=2))

Llent20254 I deleted a User API Key but it is still working.

Brandon•6/12/25, 1:22 PM

Hey lent — I'll look into this and let you know what I find out.

Victor•6/12/25, 5:50 PM

In the past ~2 hours I'm seeing an uptick in working binding .create().create() with the whole error being just internal errorinternal error

VVictor In the past ~2 hours I'm seeing an uptick in working binding `.create()` with th...

Victor•6/12/25, 5:54 PM

Also the dashboard is erroring out with 500500s intermittently with 1000110001: workflows.api.error.internal_serverworkflows.api.error.internal_server

ddsgadget•6/12/25, 6:08 PM

Is cloudflare down? B/c all our KV storage is erroring and the dashboard no longer works?

Chaika•6/12/25, 6:12 PM

CDN is fine (Discord is through it!), but there's def something messed with kv, known issue

ddsgadget•6/12/25, 6:13 PM

cloudflare dashboard doesn't work at all. i guess it uses KV on the backend. Anyway, always suprising to me that nothing is ever reported on the Cloudflare status page till way later, but something is up. how do you even inform Cloudflare that something is wrong?

koraytaylan•6/12/25, 6:28 PM

dashboard does not load at all. indefinitely verifying if i am a human.

Dddsgadget cloudflare dashboard doesn't work at all. i guess it uses KV on the backend. Any...

Chaika•6/12/25, 6:36 PM

They have tons of internal alerting so they noticed this super quickly, but if it's more limited in scope us (community champs) can escalate things

VVictor In the past ~2 hours I'm seeing an uptick in working binding `.create()` with th...

Victor•6/12/25, 10:26 PM

following up now that the outage has been resolved, the incident was marked as resolved at 21:31 UTC (the left most red column on the graph). I still got that group of 10, but also 20 more internal errorinternal error on workflow binding .create().create() since. However, falling back to the HTTP workflow POST .../{workflow_name}/instancesPOST .../{workflow_name}/instances api (with the exact same workflow id + params, it succeeds

Kkoraytaylan in workflow instance details page, output gets truncated for a particular "step ...

koraytaylan•6/13/25, 5:55 AM

i am still suffering from this.

Delong•6/13/25, 1:59 PM

Any plans to improve workflow dashboard experience, it is quite slow for no apparent reasons.

JJehu Does anyone have a workaround for testing workflows. See ticket below. Any help ...

Advany•6/13/25, 6:15 PM

where you able to solve this?

AAdvany where you able to solve this?

Jehu•6/14/25, 2:49 AM

Nope, we are in the CF purgatory when it comes to vitest + workflows. :NotLikeThis:

Dan (Openside)•6/14/25, 3:38 PM

When architecting workflows and steps, what are the pros/cons of using a queue in conjunction with a workflow vs. just running a loop and performing a step. Example: I read from the db a list of URLs that need to be moved over to R2. What would be better architecture: Read in the list, loop through and perform batch steps for each? Or add each one to the queue which then triggers a new workflow for each. Here is what I have come up with, curious to hear what else I should be thinking about.

No Queue (stay within workflow) approach:
Pros - avoid queue pricing; can aggregate results of all of them and then do more processing once they are all done.
Cons - may hit the 1024 steps limit depending on size of list and number of inner steps; all share same workflow storage so may hit 1GB storage limit

Use Queue (run new workflow per item) approach:
Pros - can rely on queue retries; starting new workflow reduces number of inner steps to avoid 1024 limit; allow for 1GB storage for each
Cons - consumes more workflow requests, increasing price; not able to easily process after all files in list are processed. added cost due to using queue.

Anything I'm missing or misinterpreting? Curious how others architect your workflows. thanks

JJehu Nope, we are in the CF purgatory when it comes to vitest + workflows. :NotLikeTh...

Advany•6/14/25, 6:01 PM

to bad... wont use workflows untill this is sovled

scook•6/15/25, 1:49 AM

Has anyone run into issues locally when invoking Workflows from async waitUntilwaitUntil code?
I have a Worker that attempts to trigger a Workflow like so:

// Worker
ctx.waitUntil(
  nonBlockingFunc({ ... })
);

async nonBlockingFunc() {
  const workflowInstance = await env.MY_WORKFLOW.create();
  // await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); // sleep fixes???
  return workflowInstance.id;
}

// Worker
ctx.waitUntil(
  nonBlockingFunc({ ... })
);

async nonBlockingFunc() {
  const workflowInstance = await env.MY_WORKFLOW.create();
  // await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); // sleep fixes???
  return workflowInstance.id;
}

On my local dev, it appears to successfully create the Workflow instance (I can see the instance id), but the Workflow itself is never actually run. However, if I insert a sleep after the invocation, then the Workflow does actually get run. Afaict this is only happening on my local and not in production.

My friendly ChatGPT claims that this is a shortcoming of Cloudflare local development / Miniflare not fully respecting the async tasks in the waitUntilwaitUntil, because it garbage collects the state and tears down the execution environment after the Workflow instance is registered but BEFORE the workflow is actually run. The sleep prevents the premature shutdown of the Worker execution context.

Can anyone verify if this is true?

IvoDev•6/15/25, 11:49 PM

Can i use durable objects inside workflows and viceversa?

Jehu•6/16/25, 12:02 AM

Yes, bindings all the way

IvoDev•6/16/25, 12:04 AM

amazing ! ultimate durability

alex (he/him)•6/16/25, 7:10 AM

Can I put everything that doesn't need an external service directly inside the runrun method without wrapping it inside a step.dostep.do. My examples are zodzod validation of params or something like const ai = new GoogleGenAI()const ai = new GoogleGenAI().. I theory I don't want to persist those, I'm fine if they run again on a new try. So would it be best to put them in the global runrun scope?

ivanovm•6/16/25, 11:39 PM

hey cloudflare team, i love the platform otherwise but it is genuinely unacceptable to have 524 timeout on outgoing requests at 100 seconds. almost every major ai model can take over 100 seconds to respond, cloudflare becomes unusable by default for ai applications

Aalex (he/him)Can I put everything that doesn't need an external service directly inside the `...

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/17/25, 3:05 AM

Sure, that’s fine. Though, even if it doesn’t need to hit an external service, if it performs a lot of work, I would still persist it

SODaLC•6/17/25, 3:36 PM

Is the first message in a workflow log suppose to be an error, or have I done something wrong? The rest of the code executes just fine.

DDan (Openside)When architecting workflows and steps, what are the pros/cons of using a queue i...

Dan (Openside)•6/17/25, 10:20 PM

curious if any Cloudflare team members have thoughts on this.

gamarra2042•6/18/25, 11:10 AM

anyone having problem with workflows today? instances all on queue and not running

Cristian Lipinski•6/18/25, 12:30 PM

Hello guys

Im facing a problem where my workflow instances get queued but never starts

This started may 15th, on that time, I noticed that when we manually paused some wf queued instance, all instances above it were triggered

then I publised a worker that basically start, pause, and finish a wf instance so my routines could be triggered

That worked until today (June 18th); this morning, none of my instances are being triggered, even with that start/pause “quick fix”

There are some crucial routines to our company, i'm even thinking about trying to migrate those routines to other account or even service

We're using a lot of cloudflare services and investing around 4.5k usd monthly

Could anyone help me with that matter?

HHello, I’m Allie!Sure, that’s fine. Though, even if it doesn’t need to hit an external service, i...

alex (he/him)•6/18/25, 2:01 PM

True. But an sdk client or a zod validator isn’t serializiable anyway, right?

TTobias Is it possible to set concurrency limits on a workflow? Kind of like how Trigger...

ItsWendell•6/18/25, 6:42 PM

Do we have any updates on this? I'm building a complicated queue with durable workers now as a workaround but this would make it easier

Gabriel Francisco•6/18/25, 7:59 PM

hey, how cloudflare workers with multiple environments deal with workflows?

Gabriel Francisco•6/18/25, 8:00 PM

should I put one workflow at the root of the wrangler.toml or should I create a workflow for each env?

Gabriel Francisco•6/18/25, 8:00 PM

the first one seems more correct but it produces a warning

Aalex (he/him)True. But an sdk client or a zod validator isn’t serializiable anyway, right?

Hello, I’m Allie!•6/19/25, 3:28 AM

I would think they are? Since they are still JS objects? Might be a case of try and see?

GGabriel Francisco should I put one workflow at the root of the wrangler.toml or should I create a ...

ddsgadget•6/19/25, 10:53 AM

You should have a separate workflow for each environment. Just change the name of the specific workflow in the wrangler.toml for each environment and leave everythng else the same in the workflow definition in the toml and it will work. Cloudflare will build a separate workflow for each environment using the same exact class. hpe that makese sense

Dddsgadget You should have a separate workflow for each environment. Just change the name o...

Gabriel Francisco•6/19/25, 2:07 PM

thank you! very helpful!

nicoritschel•6/19/25, 2:29 PM

Are containers still landing this month?

When i try to publish a workflow with workers i get this error: Token Permissions: If scopes are mis

Common headers

── 1. List all user-level API tokens ──

── 2. List all account-level API tokens ──

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Common headers

── 1. List all user-level API tokens ──

── 2. List all account-level API tokens ──

Similar Threads