Ngl I didn't yet realise how much work you have put into this
Ngl I didn't yet realise how much work you have put into this
DLooks amazing
Pthank you, been working my ass off haha
Pftr, though
Pthe code is all terrible
DYou always say that 
Pok but.... eh it's only a little worse than buildtools
Pbut there are some files, like the ToC plugin, that are just so cognitively complex that it's borderline incomprehensible
Panyways
Pi made this for the silk.net website primarily
Pi don't want to put a lot of engineering effort into it short-term mainly because the support implications of a static site generator that people actually want to use has terrifies me
PYour one-stop-shop for high performance .NET graphics & compute. A .NET Foundation project.
Pvery very very very very early wip
D
DThis is just asking for us to make a proper test project 
PYou have no idea how much I want that photo in real life haha
DAlso can we have just getting started with Silk.NET and then one getting started per binding? I mean that should be trivial to make.
Pwhen we have getting starteds for multiple bindings yes
DOK that is just a challenge
Pyour mission
Pshould you choose to accept it
Pis to make examples/CSharp/OpenGL Tutorials
Pbut in Vulkan
Pthis message will self destruct in 5 seconds
DI can probably port vkguide.dev
Pi want a consistent syllabus though
DWTF is syllabus
Pof course, in vulkan there are a LOT of different details
Pbut the outcome of each chapter i'd like to be the same
DPretty sure I can make a line by line port lol
Pi.e. a window (for vulkan probably bundle instance, swapchain, and logical device creation in here too), then a quad, then abstractions, then textures, etc etc
DOh wait you mean LearnOpenGL in vulkan
DThat's not happening
DThat would be a huge amount of code
DIe the whole lighting thing
DIn Vulkan that's like... I can make that raytraced and it'd be as easy as not raytraced
Pwho said anything about raytracing
Popengl doesn't have raytracing
DWell I mean in terms of difficulty
KIsn't there an extension
Pi'd just take a look at the code before making a judgement is my advice
Pa lot of the stuff isn't that complex
DVulkan just normalizes anything to "pretty difficult", it's not super difficult to do anything, but it's also not trivial to make even basic stuff
Plike the lighting is just in a fragment shader
Pwith some uniforms
DI mean I can look, but also I don't feel it makes that much sense
DRelying on some of the community recommended tutorials is much better imo
Pfor the record the author of learnopengl is currently in the process of making learnopengl but in vulkan
DWhat
DThat's... Interesting
DI mean makes sense, there is no really good vk tutorial
