ah you know what, there's _worker.js, nm. looks like it's for SSR.
ah you know what, there's _worker.js, nm. looks like it's for SSR.
G@matt_d8380 wanted to give it a shot, and it's super fast, and in my case I can fully get away with the static adapter
KThat's what I think it is, it is ssr now so each request would count as a function hit i think
IEven if it did fetch the static file it would count as a function run, if you deploy a
_worker.jsfunctions/[[path]].jsYup, that's what I meant
Kstart of a month iirc
Kno, they run on all paths and check to run code or not on that page
Kwell, this is how i understand it, there is some dynamic ability of functions as in which pages they run on, to get this, there is a worker invocation which then decides if it needs to do something to that page or not
Gyeah, I'm working on seeing if I can't separate the functions out into separate functions files so requesting images/js/css/prerendered routes doesn't generate a function run but I don't think that's going to be terribly easy in the context of sveltekit.
Gi generated 275 function uses in 22 requests, mostly from the split JS that sveltekit imports. on the good front, it's cahceable, still a little wasteful though.
Khow does the cache work for it?
Kif it's the same as workers, those count as function runs too
Gworks great, I was intentionally generating unique requests just to see.
Git didn't seem to in this case.
Ki think this is a beta hiccup, there will atleast be a way that it is not run on some files like css and images
Gyeah it'd be nice if anything hitting env.ASSETS didn't count.
Kis that browser cache?
Gah, yes, not cloudflare cache. I should've checked that.
Kyea
Kmakes sense
IHave you added the binding in the local command?
G@kavinplays is the cloudflare cache counting as a worker invocation still (or still invoking the worker) documented anywhere?
Gi'm putting together a feature request/feedback and just wanted to cite things if possible
IAny request to a path where it runs. All requests to the site if you have a
_worker.js/functions
JDoes functions usage count towards the regular workers usage?
INo, it's separate. 100k/day for free now during the beta. You can do 100k/day for each for free. Workers can be increased for a price.
Jah cool
IThat doesn't sound correct... What is the path you are deploying to? Can you share a screenshot of the
/functionsit's probably _worker.js, see above about how a few of us have talked about this and how to maybe do some better work there in the future around static assets.
Git actually punishes you for doing things like route or bundle splitting that things like sveltekit do
Goh that's different I suppose.
IIt looks correct to me, I did notice some weird count of invocations myself, but it was a
_worker.jsI was about to ping @gregbrimble, but I see him typing ahah