I was about to ping @gregbrimble, but I see him typing ahah
I was about to ping @gregbrimble, but I see him typing ahah
GWe’re aware of this issue on Windows. I’ll be trying to fix next week 
AHe's always watching! 
IEven on a Saturday night 
Acovid 
Ahehe me too
IBut Greg is in the UK, if I remember correctly. So it's 10pm on the Saturday. We are going OT.
Aswitching between usc and bama rn
GYeah, we talked about it before, but any project with any functions stuff (anything in the functions directory or an _worker.js) make every request on that project count as an invocation.
IOh, wow. Didn't know that. I guess it needs to parse the paths...
GWe’re figuring out if we can get smarter about that when we come out of beta, but yes, even static assets without any matching route will count as an invocation.
GJust get in touch if it’s an issue and we’ll be more than happy to up that 100k limit.
GFor a little behind-the-scenes, what we’re doing at the moment is just compiling the functions directory into an _worker.js.
GAnd that gets invoked for all incoming requests.
G@gregbrimble I sent a support req, we're about 99% sure of migrating almost all of our backend over to CF + CF pages and moving a bunch more into durable objects, we're super thrilled but getting hit hard by that req limit at the moment. looking at doing some more clever things with setting up another service, but need service bindings too. no worries today, but I'm working on machinery.
GAH!
JI'd think that only requests to matching routes would count as an invocation, would this behavior change when pages functions leaves beta?
Gso there's no functional difference between _worker.js and all of the functions
IYeah, you can see the file when building locally 
IDX wise yeah, but functionality apparently not.
Gthat's good to know, I was trying to automatically strip out our SSR into individual functions.
Gcloth?
Jah didnt see that message
GThis Google form is the best place for requests to raise that limit: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe4N0BjIxu9AuissCAtYjXUovViXmdx2zopjzASaJi_SImJsw/viewform?usp=send_form
Appreciate you trying out Pages and functions!
Appreciate you trying out Pages and functions!
Google Docs
If you have hit your limit for invocation requests while deploying your functions on Cloudflare Pages, you can submit this form to our team to learn more about your use case. Please provide the information below in case we need to chat with you more about raising the limit.
Please note: this limit increase is only applied to Functions deployed...
Please note: this limit increase is only applied to Functions deployed...
G@gregbrimble perfect, one form I hadn't filled out yet. 
GWe might change it, so don't rely on this behavior, but yeah, they're pretty functionally similar at the moment.
functions gives you simple routing behavior and an arguably easier API, but they boil down to the same thing at the moment.G@gregbrimble Does the separated Routes -> workers feature do the same thing functionally as well?
Gi.e. is there an optimization path to be had today on my end?
GAbsolutely. But bear in mind folks, that this is no worse than what Workers Sites does today. We'll absolutely be trying to figure out when we can know the request isn't anything functions-y, but we just don't have the answers right now.
Jmakes sense
IYou mean deploying a separate Worker?
GNormal Workers will only be invoked if the incoming request matches the route you set.
GBut seriously, if you're trying to use functions and are concerned about that limit, we'll just raise it for you!
GDefinitely don't want that being a concern for you trying out functions and giving us vital feedback
Ger, to be a little more specific (thank you for answering on your weekend!) - with regular workers Routes, do all of those, from a "total size of isolate" perspective get compiled down the same way? and even with the goal to shrink cold starts, is there a benefit today to, with multiple routes, splitting out those workers?
Gwhat got me asking about that was how pages functions works today under the hood.
Gis that a generalizable model, I suppose.
GI feel like I'm generating out some big isolates locally, but maybe not.
Jassuming I have a pages function at
functions/api/lookup.js I could request it from /api/lookup, right?GOh, no. Normal Workers are very much their own thing, and they aren't combined in any funky ways whatsoever.
