hmm, linear instead of point clamp filtering maybe
hmm, linear instead of point clamp filtering maybe
Lyou want to look for the sampling mode, antialiasing isn't applicable here
L^
Tdownscaling large textures (1000 to 100) won't be effective either
TOr make/get an svg heart
TSidestep the problem
Tespecially considering that they are using Silky.Nvg
RThe garbage collector has no bearing on cleaning up your graphics resources.
RThe only exception to that is if you use a custom class that explicitly does so on garbage collection
FWhat I want to get is on screenshot, using svg will not work in this case. Tried all flags on Nvg.createImage, but it all looks the same.
Lpngtree
Twhy would svg not work 
FBecause textures are in png, they are images. I have many assets similar type for game UI.
Tunderstandable. you may be able to set the filtering mode before rendering
Tor just clone silky.nvg and modify it to your needs
ROr you could just not use it for images like this
FFound soulution fir Unity, and it said - use custom shader some kind of “alpha-cut off” for displaying UI, similar like shaders for transparent hairs. But this it too complicated, for person who barely knows how to load image 
Talpha cut-off is absolutely not what you want lol
RYou just want a quad
RA textured quad
Ti'm surprised nvg doesn't have a way to change texture filtering mode :/
FJust for “science” - Silky.Nvg is a wrpapper? Not real library? I cant modify how things rendered? For example add some effects using shaders from examples.
Tit is a implementation in c#, you can modify it however you like
Toh would you look at thats, ImageFlags has a
Nearest flagTso images are linear-filtered by default
Tmaybe you should try generating mipmaps or just make those images smaller
FThanks, flags have no visual effect. Maybe I use it in wrong way. I set flag once when image loaded from path.
Ti don't think the filtering mode would help you when the image is being scaled 10 to 1
Tor the filtering mode is setup to not scale when going down, only when scaling up
Lyou can also scale down the image in a photo editor to a reasonable size
FRepeated my experiment with fresh head, and this works:
Image has dark border, but not pixelated.
nvg.CreateImage(Src, ImageFlags.GenerateMimpas);Image has dark border, but not pixelated.
Llooks like a classic computer color is broken moment
LYouTubeminutephysics
Thanks to http://www.audible.com/minutephysics for supporting this video!
MinutePhysics is on Google+ - http://bit.ly/qzEwc6
And facebook - http://facebook.com/minutephysics
And twitter - @minutephysics
Minute Physics provides an energetic and entertaining view of old and new problems in physics -- all in a minute!
Music by Nathaniel Schroed...
MinutePhysics is on Google+ - http://bit.ly/qzEwc6
And facebook - http://facebook.com/minutephysics
And twitter - @minutephysics
Minute Physics provides an energetic and entertaining view of old and new problems in physics -- all in a minute!
Music by Nathaniel Schroed...
FSo much science just to display picture 
FI tested with Photoshop, resized image to 100px - and pixelated effect gone.
Image displayed ok with default "0" flag. So it was just an issue with image loading.
For the average user this is out of logic, we're expecting bigger images will look better.
Image displayed ok with default "0" flag. So it was just an issue with image loading.
For the average user this is out of logic, we're expecting bigger images will look better.
Ayou often have mixed results scaling down large images.
if you use linear interpolation with mipmapping though it can look pretty damn good
if you use linear interpolation with mipmapping though it can look pretty damn good
Abut if you're using point interpolation with no mipmaps then it's gonna look pretty garbage
FWhat type of "interpolation" should I choose for 2d textures? Image editors have multiple options, never thought they are important.
Tgpus are not good at filtering
Tthat's why mipmaps exist
Abilinear is normally decent enough.
if you're using a image editor then cubic interpolation is the one I'd suggest
if you're using a image editor then cubic interpolation is the one I'd suggest
Tmost image editors just have a "best quality" option
Areally? both the ones I use allow you to specify the exact interpolation type to use
Tby "just" i didn't mean only one :)
Aah
Tpaint.net is pretty good
Athe heck is fant lmao
Tsome cursed box filter apparently
Tused by windows imaging component and WPF. it's pretty bad compared to most methods
Afant more like pants
please tell me pants is not another thing only us brits use
T